Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>
> ...
> > I'm of a belief that *eventually* we really can take enough of the
> > variables into consideration for planning the best query every time. I
> > didn't say it was gunna be soon, nor easy though.
>
> I agree. But I'd like to eliminate the optimizer variability which
> depends solely on the syntactical differences between traditional and
> "join syntax" inner join queries. If the reason for these differences
> are to allow explicit control over join order, let's get another
> mechanism for doing that.
Ok. I see what you mean now.
That makes more sense. :)
+ Justin
> - Thomas
--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there." - Indira Gandhi
