Re: Operators and schemas - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Operators and schemas
Date
Msg-id 26317.1018902662@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Operators and schemas  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Operators and schemas  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> We could make some sort of escape syntax, like

>     op1 myschema.operator(+) op2

I thought a little bit about that ... the above syntax does not work
but it looks like we could do something along the lines of
op1 OPERATOR(myschema.+) op2

where OPERATOR has to become a fully reserved keyword.

But: do you really want to see all dumped rules, defaults, etc in that
style?  Ugh... talk about loss of readability...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts