Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Jan Wieck wrote:
> > You forgot who wrote that code originally. I feel alot
> > better WITH the tests in place :-)
> >
> > And if it's merely to make sure the install worked, man who
> > is doing source installations these days and runs the
> > regression tests anyway? Most people throw in a RPM or the
> > like, only a few serious users install from sources, and only
> > a fistfull of them then runs regression.
> >
> > Aren't it mostly developers and distro-maintainers who use
> > that directory? I think your entire point isn't just weak,
> > IMNSVHO you don't really have a point.
>
> It is my understanding that RPM does run that test. My main issue is
> why does numeric have to be so much larger than the other tests? I have
> not heard that explained.
Well, I heard Thomas commenting that it's horribly slow implemented (or so, don't recall his exact
wording). But he's right.
I think the same test done with float8 would run in less than a tenth of that time. This is only an explanation
"why it takes so long"? It is no argument pro or con the test itself.
I think I made my point clear enough, that I consider calling these functions just once is plain sloppy. But
that'sjust my opinion. What do others think?
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
