Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Having seen zero reports of any numeric
> > failures since we installed it, and seeing it takes >10x times longer
> > than the other tests, I think it should be paired back. Do we really
> > need 10 tests of each complex function? I think one would do the trick.
>
> A good point tho, I didn't submit a regression test that tries to ALTER 3
> different non-existent tables to check for failures - one test was enough...
That was my point. Is there much value in testing each function ten
times. Anyway, seems only I care so I will drop it.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
