Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > > So should I go ahead and submit a patch for BETWEEN that adds SYMMETRY
> > > support in the old-style code, and then at a later stage submit
> > a patch that
> > > makes BETWEEN a proper node?
> >
> > Sure, I think that makes sense. The larger BETWEEN node code will be
> > tricky.
>
> Question: Why have you created a special case for NOT BETWEEN? Wouldn't you
> just need a BETWEEN node and the NOT node will handle the NOTing?
>
> Or is it because BETWEEN isn't a node at the moment?
Well, looking at the grammar, I don't know how I could have gotten NOT
into that construction. There are two parameters separated by AND and I
didn't know how to do it.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
