Re: timeout implementation issues - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: timeout implementation issues
Date
Msg-id 200204100027.g3A0R1929901@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: timeout implementation issues  (Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > > Oops does the first mean rolling back the variables on abort ?
> > > If so I made a mistake. The current is better than the second.
> > 
> > The second means all SET's are rolled back on abort.
> 
> I see.
> BTW what varibles are rolled back on abort currently ?

Currently, none, though the SET commands after the query aborts are
ignored, which is effectively the same as rolling them back.
BEGIN WORK;SET x=3;failed query;SET x=5;COMMIT;

In this case, x=3 at end of query.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hiroshi Inoue
Date:
Subject: Re: timeout implementation issues
Next
From: Hiroshi Inoue
Date:
Subject: Re: timeout implementation issues