Re: timeout implementation issues - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: timeout implementation issues
Date
Msg-id 200204082115.g38LFfQ00224@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: timeout implementation issues  ("Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us]
> > > 
> > > OK using your example, one by one
> > > 
> > >       BEGIN WORK;
> > >      SET query_timeout=20;
> > >      query fails;
> > >      SET query_timeout=0;
> > > 
> > > For what the SET was issued ?
> > > What command is issued if the query was successful ?
> > > 
> > >      COMMIT WORK;
> > 
> > Here, SET should only to the query labeled "query fails". 
> 
> Why should the SET query_timeout = 0 command be issued
> only when the query failed ? Is it a JDBC driver's requirement
> or some applications' requirements which uses the JDBC driver ?

They want the timeout for only the one statement, so they have to set it
to non-zero before the statement, and to zero after the statement.  In
our current code, if the query fails, the setting to zero is ignored,
meaning all following queries have the timeout, even ones outside that
transaction.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Hiroshi Inoue"
Date:
Subject: Re: timeout implementation issues
Next
From: Hiroshi Inoue
Date:
Subject: Re: timeout implementation issues