Y'all are having entirely too much fun with this :P
Though the headling ...
'PostgreSQL with its proprietary bitch-rant-rating query planner storms
the DB front.'
does have a certain...entertainment value.
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>...
>
>>Weighing these factors, perhaps once we get one or two complaining about
>>postgresql using an index vs 20 complaining about not using an index, then
>>the optimizer values have reached a good compromise :). But maybe the ratio
>>should be 1 vs 100?
>>
>
>:)
>
>So we should work on collecting those statistics, rather than statistics
>on data. What do you think Tom; should we work on a "mailing list based
>planner" which adjusts numbers from, say, a web site? That is just too
>funny :)))
>
> - Thomas
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
>
