Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Ewe, I was hoping for something with zero overhead for the non-SET case.
>
> Well, a function call and immediate return if no SET has been executed
> in the current xact seems low enough overhead to me. We'll just keep
> a flag showing whether there's anything to do.
Oh, I thought you were going to save all the GUC variables on
transaction start. I now assume you are going to have one field per
variable for the pre-xact value. That is fine.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
