Thomas Lockhart <thomas@fourpalms.org> writes:
> I'm still not sure why the INT64CONST conflict does not show up as a
> warning on my machine, but looking at the code I'm not sure why we would
> ever have had two versions in the first place. Anyone want to take
> responsibility for consolidating it into The Right Place? If not, I'll
> go ahead and do it...
I think it was originally needed only for the CRC code, so we put it
there to begin with. Clearly should be in a more widely used place now.
Do you have any opinion whether c.h or int8.h is the Right Place?
I'm still dithering about that.
regards, tom lane
