Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch
Date
Msg-id 1532.1018539881@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch  ("Mario Weilguni" <mario.weilguni@icomedias.com>)
Responses Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch  (Mario Weilguni <mario.weilguni@icomedias.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Mario Weilguni" <mario.weilguni@icomedias.com> writes:
> And I did not find out how I can detect the large object
> chunksize, either from getting it from the headers (include
> "storage/large_object.h" did not work)

Why not?

Still, it might make sense to move the LOBLKSIZE definition into
pg_config.h, since as you say it's of some interest to clients like
pg_dump.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Make text output more generic
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: help with bison