Re: timeout implementation issues - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jan Wieck
Subject Re: timeout implementation issues
Date
Msg-id 200204081446.g38EkBL12342@saturn.janwieck.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: timeout implementation issues  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: timeout implementation issues  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz> writes:
> >  Is there some problem implement "SET ... ON ROLLBACK UNSET" ?
>
> Yes.  See my previous example concerning search_path: that variable
> MUST be rolled back at transaction abort, else we risk its value being
> invalid.  We cannot offer the user a choice.
   Not  really on topic, but I was wondering how you ensure that   you correct the search path in case someone drops
theschema?
 
   Is an invalid search path really that critical (read security   issue)?


Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: timeout implementation issues
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: timeout implementation issues