Re: timeout implementation issues - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jessica Perry Hekman
Subject Re: timeout implementation issues
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0204051012410.19133-100000@atalanta.dynamicdiagrams.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: timeout implementation issues  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> It that acceptable to the JDBC folks?  It requires two "SET timeout = 0"
> statements, one after the statement in the transaction, and another
> after the transaction COMMIT WORK.

That's fine, though probably about as much work as just implementing the
whole thing in JDBC.

j



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PQescapeBytea is not multibyte aware
Next
From: Justin Clift
Date:
Subject: [Fwd: AW: UB-Tree's and patents]