Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> >
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > OK, we have three possibilities:
> > >
> > > o All SETs are honored in an aborted transaction
> > > o No SETs are honored in an aborted transaction
> > > o Some SETs are honored in an aborted transaction (current)
> > >
> > > I think the problem is our current behavior. I don't think anyone can
> > > say our it is correct (only honor SET before the transaction reaches
> > > abort state). Whether we want the first or second is the issue, I think.
> >
> > I think the current state is not that bad at least
> > is better than the first.
>
> Oops does the first mean rolling back the variables on abort ?
> If so I made a mistake. The current is better than the second.
The second means all SET's are rolled back on abort.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
