mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com> writes:
> If the DBA notices that there is a problem with a query, he adds an
> index, he notices that there is no difference, then he notices that
> PostgreSQL is not using his index. First and foremost he gets mad at
> PostgreSQL for not using his index. If PostgreSQL decided to use an
> index which increases execution time, the DBA would delete the
> index.
I don't buy that argument at all. It might be a unique index that he
must have in place for data integrity reasons. It might be an index
that he needs for a *different* query.
If the table has more than one index available that might be usable
with a particular query, how does your argument help? It doesn't.
We still have to trust to statistics and cost estimates. So I intend
to proceed on the path of improving the estimator, not in the direction
of throwing it out in favor of rules-of-thumb.
regards, tom lane
