Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 May 2000

• 03:25   RE: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:29   Back in town Thomas Lockhart
• 03:37   Re: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Bruce Momjian
• 10:06   Re: gmake[3]: *** No rule to make target page/SUBSYS.o ????????????????? Thomas Lockhart
• 10:20   Re: Cosmetic bug in 7.0 docs Thomas Lockhart
• 12:00   Re: CREATE TABLE AS standard? Thomas Lockhart
• 12:05   Re: How to compile a dynamically loadable object file Thomas Lockhart
• 14:56   Re: CREATE TABLE AS standard? Bruce Momjian
• 15:26   Re: CREATE TABLE AS standard? Thomas Lockhart
• 16:44   Re: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Ross J. Reedstrom
• 16:54   Re: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Bruce Momjian
• 17:09   Re: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Bruce Momjian
• 17:46   Re: FW: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Ross J. Reedstrom
• 17:52   Re: FW: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Bruce Momjian
• 18:13   Re: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Tom Lane
• 18:45   Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea Peter Eisentraut
• 18:53   Re: When malloc returns zero ... Peter Eisentraut
• 19:03   Re: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Brian E Gallew
• 19:09   Re: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Ross J. Reedstrom
• 20:08   Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea Tom Lane
• 20:18   Re: When malloc returns zero ... Tom Lane
• 20:27   Re: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Tom Lane
• 21:22   Re: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Ross J. Reedstrom

2 May 2000

• 00:02   [Fwd: PG 7.0 is great!] Lamar Owen
• 00:02   RE: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:36   RE: When malloc returns zero ... Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:57   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Thomas Lockhart
• 01:32   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Lamar Owen
• 01:36   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian
• 01:48   psql \l error SAKAIDA
• 02:25   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Thomas Lockhart
• 03:35   Re: psql \l error Tom Lane
• 03:37   ... Billy G. Allie
• 03:44   Update to FAQ_SCO. Billy G. Allie
• 04:14   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Thomas Lockhart
• 04:21   Re: Case insensitive collation. Malcontent
• 04:44   RE: psql \l error Hiroshi Inoue
• 05:53   Re: psql \l error SAKAIDA
• 06:53   Re: psql \l error Tatsuo Ishii
• 06:55   RE: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount
• 07:03   RE: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount
• 07:22   RE: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount
• 07:33   Re: psql \l error Peter Eisentraut
• 07:40   RE: psql \l error Peter Eisentraut
• 07:46   RE: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount
• 08:15   Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea Peter Eisentraut
• 08:26   Re: psql \l error SAKAIDA
• 08:29   Re: When malloc returns zero ... Peter Eisentraut
• 09:21   Re: psql \l error Hiroshi Inoue
• 09:54   Re: [PORTS] Update to FAQ_SCO. Bruce Momjian
• 10:01   Re: psql \l error Bruce Momjian
• 10:02   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian
• 10:07   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian
• 10:08   Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea Thomas Lockhart
• 10:38   Re: PgAccess 0.98.6 , a ugly bug fixed Bruce Momjian
• 10:41   RE: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount
• 10:44   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Thomas Lockhart
• 10:46   RE: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount
• 10:52   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian
• 11:03   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian
• 11:07   RE: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount
• 11:09   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Thomas Lockhart
• 11:13   Re: psql \l error Bruce Momjian
• 11:40   RE: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount
• 11:46   RE: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount
• 12:09   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian
• 12:17   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian
• 12:23   insert new type (object ?) Loïc TREGOUËT
• 12:27   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian
• 12:47   Re: When malloc returns zero ... Mark Hollomon
• 12:49   Re: Patch submission Thomas Lockhart
• 12:53   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Thomas Lockhart
• 12:59   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian
• 13:11   Re: psql \l error SAKAIDA Masaaki
• 13:16   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Thomas Lockhart
• 13:22   Re: Proposal for fixing intra-query memory leaks Karel Zak
• 13:27   RE: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount
• 13:45   Re: insert new type (object ?) JanWieck@t-online.de (Jan Wieck)
• 13:59   Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea Tom Lane
• 14:21   Re: When malloc returns zero ... Tom Lane
• 14:31   Re: Patch submission Adam Haberlach
• 14:40   Re: psql \l error Tom Lane
• 14:52   Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea Tom Lane
• 14:54   Hardcopy docs about ready Thomas Lockhart
• 15:09   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Tom Lane
• 15:26   Re: Proposal for fixing intra-query memory leaks Tom Lane
• 15:41   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Don Baccus
• 15:56   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian
• 16:10   Re: [Acs-pg-dev] another milestone! Don Baccus
• 16:23   Why Not MySQL? Don Baccus
• 16:28   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Tom Lane
• 16:40   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian
• 16:49   Re: Proposal for fixing intra-query memory leaks Karel Zak
• 20:31   Re: Proposal for fixing intra-query memory leaks Peter Eisentraut
• 20:38   Re: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Peter Eisentraut
• 20:39   Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea Peter Eisentraut
• 20:40   Re: Proposal for fixing intra-query memory leaks Tom Lane
• 20:43   Re: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Bruce Momjian
• 20:51   Re: Proposal for fixing intra-query memory leaks Karel Zak
• 20:51   Re: Proposal for fixing intra-query memory leaks Tom Lane
• 20:59   Re: Why Not MySQL? Bruce Momjian
• 21:03   Re: Proposal for fixing intra-query memory leaks Tom Lane
• 21:25   Re: Why Not MySQL? Mitch Vincent
• 22:02   Re: Why Not MySQL? Tim Uckun
• 22:08   Re: Why Not MySQL? Don Baccus
• 23:14   RE: When malloc returns zero ... Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:55   7.0RC2 compile error ! frank

3 May 2000

• 00:18   Re: 7.0RC2 compile error ! Bruce Momjian
• 00:20   Re: Why Not MySQL? The Hermit Hacker
• 00:38   Corruption (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL?) The Hermit Hacker
• 01:30   Re: 7.0RC2 compile error ! Bruce Momjian
• 02:03   PostgreSQL v7.0 - Release Candidate 3 The Hermit Hacker
• 02:18   pgtksh Bruce Momjian
• 02:22   pgtksh Bruce Momjian
• 02:35   Patch for FAQ_SCO Billy G. Allie
• 02:46   Re: [PORTS] Patch for FAQ_SCO Bruce Momjian
• 02:47   Re: pgtksh Tom Lane
• 02:53   Re: pgtksh Bruce Momjian
• 02:57   Re: [GENERAL] postgresql7.0 jdbc driver Bruce Momjian
• 03:00   RE: psql \l error Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:14   Re: Why Not MySQL? Thomas Lockhart
• 03:19   Re: [GENERAL] postgresql7.0 jdbc driver Anand Raman
• 03:20   Testing something ... The Hermit Hacker
• 03:20   Re: When malloc returns zero ... Tom Lane
• 03:24   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Thomas Lockhart
• 03:27   Re: Why Not MySQL? Malcontent null
• 03:28   Re: Hardcopy docs about ready Thomas Lockhart
• 03:35   Re: Hardcopy docs about ready The Hermit Hacker
• 03:39   Re: Testing something ... The Hermit Hacker
• 03:50   Re: Why Not MySQL? Malcontent null
• 03:50   Re: 7.0RC2 compile error ! Thomas Lockhart
• 03:54   Re: Testing something ... scrappy@hub.org (Marc G. Fournier)
• 03:59   Re: Why Not MySQL? Don Baccus
• 04:06   Re: Why Not MySQL? Thomas Lockhart
• 04:17   Re: Why Not MySQL? Hannu Krosing
• 04:38   RE: When malloc returns zero ... Hiroshi Inoue
• 05:07   Re: Why Not MySQL? Malcontent null
• 05:22   Re: Why Not MySQL? Malcontent null
• 05:39   RE: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount
• 06:02   RE: Re: [GENERAL] postgresql7.0 jdbc driver Peter Mount
• 08:01   Re: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Peter Eisentraut
• 08:14   RE: Re: [GENERAL] postgresql7.0 jdbc driver Peter Mount
• 08:31   Re: Corruption (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL?) Vince Vielhaber
• 08:42   Re: Re: [GENERAL] postgresql7.0 jdbc driver Anand Raman
• 09:11   RE: Re: [GENERAL] postgresql7.0 jdbc driver Peter Mount
• 09:55   Re: Re: [GENERAL] postgresql7.0 jdbc driver Anand Raman
• 10:17   RE: Re: [GENERAL] postgresql7.0 jdbc driver Peter Mount
• 10:21   plperl is still disabled David Jack Olrik
• 10:44   RE: Why Not MySQL? Magnus Hagander
• 10:46   RE: Why Not MySQL? Magnus Hagander
• 10:55   Re: Why Not MySQL? Hannu Krosing
• 11:23   Re: psql \l error SAKAIDA Masaaki
• 11:27   Re: Why Not MySQL? The Hermit Hacker
• 11:30   Re: Corruption (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL?) The Hermit Hacker
• 11:44   Re: plperl is still disabled Mark Hollomon
• 11:48   Re: Why Not MySQL? Hannu Krosing
• 12:12   RE: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Don Baccus
• 12:13   Re: Why Not MySQL? Sergio A. Kessler
• 12:31   Re: Why Not MySQL? Bruce Momjian
• 12:33   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian
• 12:39   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian
• 12:43   RE: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount
• 13:16   Re: Why Not MySQL? Mitch Vincent
• 13:25   Re: Corruption (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL?) Mitch Vincent
• 13:34   Re: 7.0RC2 compile error ! frank
• 13:39   Re: Why Not MySQL? Mitch Vincent
• 13:42   Re: Corruption (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL?) Mitch Vincent
• 13:44   Re: Corruption (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL?) Ed Loehr
• 13:44   Re: Why Not MySQL? The Hermit Hacker
• 13:48   Re: Corruption (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL?) The Hermit Hacker
• 13:58   Re: 7.0RC2 compile error ! Lamar Owen
• 14:13   Re: Why Not MySQL? Tom Lane
• 14:19   Re: 7.0RC2 compile error ! Ross J. Reedstrom
• 14:22   Re: Why Not MySQL? Tom Lane
• 14:23   Re: Why Not MySQL? Mitch Vincent
• 14:30   Re: Why Not MySQL? Tom Lane
• 14:30   Re: Why Not MySQL? The Hermit Hacker
• 14:35   Re: Why Not MySQL? The Hermit Hacker
• 14:44   Re: 7.0RC2 compile error ! Tom Lane
• 14:52   Re: Why Not MySQL? Tom Lane
• 15:05   RE: [INTERFACES] RE: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount
• 15:16   Re: 7.0RC2 compile error ! Tom Lane
• 15:22   Re: 7.0RC2 compile error ! teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 15:33   Re: 7.0RC2 compile error ! The Hermit Hacker
• 16:00   Re: Why Not MySQL? Don Baccus
• 16:00   Re: Why Not MySQL? Don Baccus
• 16:09   Re: 7.0RC2 compile error ! The Hermit Hacker
• 16:33   Re: Why Not MySQL? Tom Lane
• 16:40   Re: 7.0RC2 compile error ! Tom Lane
• 16:42   Re: Why Not MySQL? Mitch Vincent
• 16:54   Re: Why Not MySQL? Tom Lane
• 17:03   Re: 7.0RC2 compile error ! The Hermit Hacker
• 17:34   Re: Why Not MySQL? Mitch Vincent
• 17:41   Re: 7.0RC2 compile error ! Tom Lane
• 17:45   Re: Why Not MySQL? Tom Lane
• 17:52   Re: Why Not MySQL? Mitch Vincent
• 18:15   Re: Why Not MySQL? Mitch Vincent
• 18:35   Re: Why Not MySQL? The Hermit Hacker
• 18:36   Re: 7.0RC2 compile error ! The Hermit Hacker
• 19:28   Re: Why Not MySQL? Mitch Vincent
• 19:40   [reedstrm@ece.rice.edu: Re: [SQL] Query problems with 7.0 beta 5] Ross J. Reedstrom
• 20:02   Re: Why Not MySQL? The Hermit Hacker
• 20:32   Re: Why Not MySQL? Tom Lane
• 20:55   Re: Why Not MySQL? Andrew McMillan
• 21:27   Re: Why Not MySQL? Tom Lane
• 21:34   \h behaviour - strange ? Frank G Hahn
• 22:07   Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea Peter Eisentraut
• 22:09   Re: psql \l error Peter Eisentraut
• 22:14   AW: Why Not MySQL? Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 22:16   Re: \h behaviour - strange ? Peter Eisentraut
• 23:01   libpq++ build now checks make rc Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 23:43   Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea Tom Lane
• 23:58   RE: psql \l error Hiroshi Inoue

4 May 2000

• 00:12   Re: psql \l error SAKAIDA Masaaki
• 00:33   Re: libpq++ build now checks make rc Tom Lane
• 00:45   Re: psql \l error SAKAIDA Masaaki
• 00:48   Re: psql \l error Tom Lane
• 01:42   RE: psql \l error Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:57   Re: Why Not MySQL? Marten Feldtmann
• 01:59   Re: psql \l error Tom Lane
• 03:12   Crack Warez Links,,Anonymous Posting Kit,,New--Anonymous MAIL BOMB pdifogrj@fbi.net
• 03:38   RE: psql \l error Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:58   Re: Crack Warez Links,,Anonymous Posting Kit,,New--Anonymous MAIL BOMB Tom Lane
• 04:14   Re: AW: Why Not MySQL? Thomas Lockhart
• 04:15   Re: Crack Warez Links,,Anonymous Posting Kit,,New--Anonymous MAIL BOMB The Hermit Hacker
• 04:23   system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? ) The Hermit Hacker
• 04:25   Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? ) Tom Lane
• 04:36   Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? ) The Hermit Hacker
• 04:48   Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? ) Tom Lane
• 04:49   pg_group_name_index corrupt? The Hermit Hacker
• 04:51   Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? ) The Hermit Hacker
• 06:31   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Tom Lane
• 07:12   AW: libpq++ build now checks make rc Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:44   AW: Crack Warez Links,,Anonymous Posting Kit,,New--Anon ymousMAIL BOMB Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 08:20   RE: Crack Warez Links,,Anonymous Posting Kit,,New--Anon ymousMAIL BOMB Peter Mount
• 08:28   Re: AW: Crack Warez Links,,Anonymous Posting Kit,,New--Anon ymousMAIL BOMB Vince Vielhaber
• 10:33   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? The Hermit Hacker
• 11:51   Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? ) Don Baccus
• 12:16   Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? ) Mitch Vincent
• 12:33   Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? ) The Hermit Hacker
• 12:42   Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? ) Mitch Vincent
• 12:55   Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? ) The Hermit Hacker
• 13:14   Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? ) Don Baccus
• 13:20   Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? ) Mitch Vincent
• 13:24   Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? ) Thomas Lockhart
• 13:28   --enable-locale and SET command ... The Hermit Hacker
• 13:28   Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? ) Don Baccus
• 13:35   Hardware/CPU Thoughts (Was: Re: system usage stats ) The Hermit Hacker
• 13:44   Re: --enable-locale and SET command ... Mitch Vincent
• 13:46   Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? ) Don Baccus
• 13:52   Re: AW: libpq++ build now checks make rc Tom Lane
• 14:02   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Tom Lane
• 14:06   Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? ) Tom Lane
• 15:01   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? The Hermit Hacker
• 15:03   Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? ) Ross J. Reedstrom
• 15:21   Re: 7.0RC2 compile error ! Peter Eisentraut
• 15:32   RE: psql \l error Peter Eisentraut
• 15:46   Is this a bug in the table definition or in PostgreSQL? Oliver Elphick
• 16:17   Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? ) Don Baccus
• 16:17   Re: --enable-locale and SET command ... Don Baccus
• 16:36   Re: 7.0RC2 compile error ! Tom Lane
• 16:42   Re: Is this a bug in the table definition or in PostgreSQL? Tom Lane
• 16:53   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Tom Lane
• 16:55   Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? ) Mitch Vincent
• 17:16   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Tom Lane
• 18:40   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? The Hermit Hacker
• 18:42   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? The Hermit Hacker
• 19:05   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Tom Lane
• 20:12   RE: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Hiroshi Inoue
• 20:50   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Tom Lane
• 21:11   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Tom Lane
• 21:34   small bug in psql's tab completion Tom Lane
• 21:39   Re: Why Not MySQL? Mitch Vincent
• 21:47   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Tom Lane
• 22:53   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? The Hermit Hacker
• 22:55   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? The Hermit Hacker
• 23:23   Re: Why Not MySQL? The Hermit Hacker
• 23:40   RE: pg_group_name_index corrupt? The Hermit Hacker
• 23:54   RE: pg_group_name_index corrupt? The Hermit Hacker

5 May 2000

• 00:02   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Tom Lane
• 00:10   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Tom Lane
• 00:12   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Tom Lane
• 00:26   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Tom Lane
• 00:31   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Tom Lane
• 01:30   ``..Advice For New Immigrants... W-A-S-P@tscudfht.gov
• 01:34   client libpq multibyte support SAKAIDA Masaaki
• 01:50   Re: ``..Advice For New Immigrants... Mike Mascari
• 01:53   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? The Hermit Hacker
• 02:13   related to the 'pg_group' issue? The Hermit Hacker
• 02:32   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Tom Lane
• 02:38   Re: ``..Advice For New Immigrants... Don Baccus
• 02:38   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? The Hermit Hacker
• 02:42   Re: client libpq multibyte support Tom Lane
• 02:44   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian
• 02:47   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Tom Lane
• 02:49   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? The Hermit Hacker
• 02:51   Re: ``..Advice For New Immigrants... The Hermit Hacker
• 02:52   Re: [INTERFACES] RE: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian
• 02:57   Re: 7.0RC2 compile error ! Bruce Momjian
• 03:02   Re: 7.0RC2 compile error ! Tom Lane
• 03:04   [CRITICAL PATCH] Release Candidate 5 ... The Hermit Hacker
• 03:06   Re: ``..Advice For New Immigrants... Don Baccus
• 03:08   Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea Bruce Momjian
• 03:12   Re: ``..Advice For New Immigrants... The Hermit Hacker
• 03:13   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? The Hermit Hacker
• 03:20   Re: 7.0RC2 compile error ! The Hermit Hacker
• 03:26   Re: [CRITICAL PATCH] Release Candidate 5 ... Tom Lane
• 03:27   Re: ``..Advice For New Immigrants... Don Baccus
• 03:32   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Tom Lane
• 03:43   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Bruce Momjian
• 03:44   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? The Hermit Hacker
• 03:52   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Bruce Momjian
• 03:53   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Tom Lane
• 03:57   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Bruce Momjian
• 04:10   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Tom Lane
• 04:16   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Bruce Momjian
• 04:16   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Bruce Momjian
• 04:17   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Bruce Momjian
• 04:34   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Tom Lane
• 04:36   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Thomas Lockhart
• 04:39   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Bruce Momjian
• 04:39   Re: related to the 'pg_group' issue? Bruce Momjian
• 04:42   Re: [CRITICAL PATCH] Release Candidate 5 ... Bruce Momjian
• 04:45   Re: [CRITICAL PATCH] Release Candidate 5 ... The Hermit Hacker
• 04:45   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? The Hermit Hacker
• 04:47   Re: 7.0RC2 compile error ! Bruce Momjian
• 04:49   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Bruce Momjian
• 04:51   Re: ``..Advice For New Immigrants... Tom Lane
• 05:04   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Tom Lane
• 05:08   Re: 7.0RC2 compile error ! Tom Lane
• 05:13   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Tom Lane
• 05:21   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Thomas Lockhart
• 07:12   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Tatsuo Ishii
• 07:13   Re: client libpq multibyte support Tatsuo Ishii
• 09:09   suggestion: docs and psql Karel Zak
• 09:37   Re: client libpq multibyte support Tatsuo Ishii
• 09:46   Re: suggestion: docs and psql Karel Zak
• 11:44   initdb problems geek+@cmu.edu (Brian E. Gallew)
• 12:07   Re: suggestion: docs and psql Thomas Lockhart
• 12:17   Re: initdb problems Thomas Lockhart
• 13:00   Re: Why Not MySQL? Mitch Vincent
• 13:03   RE: suggestion: docs and psql Magnus Hagander
• 13:20   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Bruce Momjian
• 13:28   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Tom Lane
• 13:35   Re: client libpq multibyte support Tom Lane
• 14:00   Re: Why Not MySQL? Tom Lane
• 14:18   Re: client libpq multibyte support Tatsuo Ishii
• 14:19   RE: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Hiroshi Inoue
• 14:19   RE: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Hiroshi Inoue
• 14:30   Re: Indexing varchar fields with lower() Mitch Vincent
• 14:34   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Thomas Lockhart
• 14:43   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Tom Lane
• 14:57   Re: client libpq multibyte support SAKAIDA Masaaki
• 15:04   Re: Porting reports (cont'd) Thomas Lockhart
• 15:08   Re: client libpq multibyte support SAKAIDA Masaaki
• 15:29   Re: 7.0RC2 compile error ! Tom Lane
• 15:35   Re: Indexing varchar fields with lower() Tom Lane
• 15:53   RFP: PostgreSQL Replication ... The Hermit Hacker
• 19:48   Re: Porting reports (cont'd) Olivier PRENANT
• 21:27   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Bruce Momjian
• 21:28   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Bruce Momjian
• 21:29   Re: Porting reports (cont'd) Bruce Momjian
• 21:34   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Tom Lane
• 21:41   You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Sverre H. Huseby
• 21:52   Re: Porting reports (cont'd) Tom Lane
• 21:52   Re: Porting reports (cont'd) Bruce Momjian
• 22:05   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Bruce Momjian
• 22:23   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Tom Lane
• 22:26   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. The Hermit Hacker
• 22:37   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Alex Pilosov
• 23:55   Re: --enable-locale and SET command ... Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:56   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Tatsuo Ishii

6 May 2000

• 00:14   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Vince Vielhaber
• 00:50   http://www.postgresql.org/doxlist.html (fwd) Vince Vielhaber
• 01:01   CREATE DATABASE WITH OWNER '??'; The Hermit Hacker
• 02:16   Re: --enable-locale and SET command ... Thomas Lockhart
• 02:29   Re: --enable-locale and SET command ... Tatsuo Ishii
• 04:06   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Tom Lane
• 04:47   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Tom Lane
• 05:16   Re: http://www.postgresql.org/doxlist.html (fwd) Tom Lane
• 06:10   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Tom Lane
• 06:11   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Sverre H. Huseby
• 06:37   Re: http://www.postgresql.org/doxlist.html (fwd) Tatsuo Ishii
• 08:56   Re: CREATE DATABASE WITH OWNER '??'; Hannu Krosing
• 13:30   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Bruce Momjian
• 13:53   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Vince Vielhaber
• 14:20   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Bruce Momjian
• 14:38   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Vince Vielhaber
• 14:51   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Bruce Momjian
• 14:56   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Bruce Momjian
• 15:09   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Vince Vielhaber
• 15:13   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Bruce Momjian
• 15:31   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Bruce Momjian
• 15:50   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Sverre H. Huseby
• 15:57   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Vince Vielhaber
• 16:01   Re: http://www.postgresql.org/doxlist.html (fwd) Tom Lane
• 16:04   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 16:04   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Bruce Momjian
• 16:19   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Vince Vielhaber
• 16:20   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Benjamin Adida
• 16:22   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Bruce Momjian
• 16:25   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Vince Vielhaber
• 16:25   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Bruce Momjian
• 16:30   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Tom Lane
• 16:31   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Bruce Momjian
• 17:16   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Tom Lane
• 17:23   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Benjamin Adida
• 17:29   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Robert B. Easter
• 17:30   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Tom Lane
• 17:35   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Benjamin Adida
• 17:41   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Vince Vielhaber
• 17:44   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Benjamin Adida
• 17:44   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Tom Lane
• 17:52   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Bruce Momjian
• 17:52   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Bruce Momjian
• 17:55   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Bruce Momjian
• 17:56   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Bruce Momjian
• 17:59   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Bruce Momjian
• 17:59   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Tom Lane
• 18:08   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Tom Lane
• 19:11   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Tom Lane
• 19:16   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Tom Lane
• 19:22   Passwords Bruce Momjian
• 19:24   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Bruce Momjian
• 19:24   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Bruce Momjian
• 19:38   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Bruce Momjian
• 19:41   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Hannu Krosing
• 19:41   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Robert B. Easter
• 20:33   ROLLBACK of DROP TABLE leaves database in inconsistent state Oliver Elphick
• 20:53   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Benjamin Adida
• 20:58   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Tom Lane
• 21:03   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Tom Lane
• 21:14   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Tom Lane
• 21:22   Re: ROLLBACK of DROP TABLE leaves database in inconsistent state Tom Lane
• 22:50   RE: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Hiroshi Inoue

7 May 2000

• 00:55   Re: Passwords The Hermit Hacker
• 01:15   Re: Passwords Alex Pilosov
• 01:22   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Robert B. Easter
• 01:23   Re: Passwords Benjamin Adida
• 01:40   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Alex Pilosov
• 02:06   So we're in agreement.... Vince Vielhaber
• 02:19   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Bruce Momjian
• 02:20   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Bruce Momjian
• 02:20   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Bruce Momjian
• 02:23   Re: So we're in agreement.... Bruce Momjian
• 02:29   Re: So we're in agreement.... The Hermit Hacker
• 02:42   Re: So we're in agreement.... Vince Vielhaber
• 02:45   Re: So we're in agreement.... Bruce Momjian
• 03:03   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Robert B. Easter
• 03:04   Re: So we're in agreement.... Tom Lane
• 03:11   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Tom Lane
• 03:18   Re: So we're in agreement.... Vince Vielhaber
• 03:21   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Bruce Momjian
• 03:51   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Tom Lane
• 04:58   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Robert B. Easter
• 05:13   Re: So we're in agreement.... Michael Robinson
• 05:34   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Tom Lane
• 05:35   Re: So we're in agreement.... Sverre H. Huseby
• 05:41   Re: So we're in agreement.... Vince Vielhaber
• 07:16   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Hannu Krosing
• 07:27   Re: So we're in agreement.... Hannu Krosing
• 07:31   Re: So we're in agreement.... Hannu Krosing
• 07:44   minor psql errors in RC5 Hannu Krosing
• 11:41   Re: So we're in agreement.... Sverre H. Huseby
• 12:31   Re: So we're in agreement.... Bruce Momjian
• 13:56   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Robert B. Easter
• 14:02   Re: client libpq multibyte support SAKAIDA Masaaki
• 14:31   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Tom Lane
• 15:17   Re: So we're in agreement.... Vince Vielhaber
• 16:19   Re: So we're in agreement.... Tom Lane
• 16:22   Re: So we're in agreement.... Vince Vielhaber
• 16:43   Re: So we're in agreement.... Tom Lane
• 17:47   Re: So we're in agreement.... Vince Vielhaber
• 18:18   Re: So we're in agreement.... Tom Lane
• 18:23   Re: So we're in agreement.... Vince Vielhaber
• 18:41   Re: So we're in agreement.... Tom Lane
• 19:52   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Hannu Krosing
• 20:11   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Robert B. Easter
• 20:15   Re: So we're in agreement.... Hannu Krosing
• 20:29   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Tom Lane
• 20:30   Re: CREATE DATABASE WITH OWNER '??'; Peter Eisentraut
• 20:30   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Peter Eisentraut
• 20:31   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Peter Eisentraut
• 20:34   Re: minor psql errors in RC5 Peter Eisentraut
• 20:38   Re: Passwords Peter Eisentraut
• 20:41   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Hannu Krosing
• 20:44   Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Tom Lane
• 20:54   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Tom Lane
• 21:06   Re: CREATE DATABASE WITH OWNER '??'; Tom Lane
• 21:58   Re: So we're in agreement.... Vince Vielhaber
• 22:00   Re: So we're in agreement.... Tom Lane
• 22:36   Re: Passwords Robert B. Easter
• 22:44   It happened again: Server hung up solid The Hermit Hacker
• 22:46   Re: CREATE DATABASE WITH OWNER '??'; The Hermit Hacker
• 23:36   Re: It happened again: Server hung up solid Tom Lane
• 23:48   Re: It happened again: Server hung up solid The Hermit Hacker
• 23:52   Re: It happened again: Server hung up solid The Hermit Hacker
• 23:55   Documentation on postgres/postmaster ... The Hermit Hacker
• 23:57   Re: It happened again: Server hung up solid Vince Vielhaber
• 23:57   Re: It happened again: Server hung up solid The Hermit Hacker
• 23:59   Re: It happened again: Server hung up solid The Hermit Hacker

8 May 2000

• 00:44   A celebrity among us :-) Lamar Owen
• 00:59   Re: A celebrity among us :-) Lamar Owen
• 01:05   Re: A celebrity among us :-) Mike Mascari
• 01:11   Re: A celebrity among us :-) Bruce Momjian
• 01:14   Re: It happened again: Server hung up solid Tom Lane
• 01:21   Re: A celebrity among us :-) Bruce Momjian
• 01:23   Re: A celebrity among us :-) Bruce Momjian
• 01:47   Re: A celebrity among us :-) Tom Lane
• 01:50   Re: It happened again: Server hung up solid Michael Robinson
• 02:41   Re: Re: It happened again: Server hung up solid The Hermit Hacker
• 02:48   Re: Re: It happened again: Server hung up solid Bruce Momjian
• 03:15   Re: Re: It happened again: Server hung up solid The Hermit Hacker
• 03:18   Re: Re: It happened again: Server hung up solid Bruce Momjian
• 03:32   Re: Re: It happened again: Server hung up solid The Hermit Hacker
• 03:34   Re: Re: It happened again: Server hung up solid Bruce Momjian
• 05:01   Re: http://www.postgresql.org/doxlist.html (fwd) Thomas Lockhart
• 05:33   Re: Re: It happened again: Server hung up solid Tom Lane
• 08:13   AW: So we're in agreement.... Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 09:10   Re: Re: It happened again: Server hung up solid Vince Vielhaber
• 10:13   Unix timestamp Olivier PRENANT
• 10:48   Re: Re: It happened again: Server hung up solid The Hermit Hacker
• 11:16   Re: Re: It happened again: Server hung up solid darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 11:22   Re: Re: It happened again: Server hung up solid The Hermit Hacker
• 11:44   Re: Re: It happened again: Server hung up solid darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 12:08   USE_SYSLOG ... useless? :) The Hermit Hacker
• 12:13   FindExec: found "/pgsql/bin/postgres" using argv[0] The Hermit Hacker
• 12:17   logging problem ... ? The Hermit Hacker
• 13:58   Ready to release? Thomas Lockhart
• 14:04   Re: Ready to release? Bruce Momjian
• 14:15   Re: Ready to release? Thomas Lockhart
• 14:23   Re: Ready to release? Tom Lane
• 14:27   Re: Ready to release? Bruce Momjian
• 14:32   Re: Re: Ready to release? Vince Vielhaber
• 14:32   Re: Ready to release? The Hermit Hacker
• 14:40   Re: So we're in agreement.... Philip Warner
• 14:42   Re: Re: Ready to release? Bruce Momjian
• 14:47   RE: [GENERAL] Recovering data from binary files? Hiroshi Inoue
• 14:48   Re: Re: Ready to release? teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 15:01   Re: So we're in agreement.... Benjamin Adida
• 15:04   Re: So we're in agreement.... Tom Lane
• 15:20   Re: Re: Ready to release? Tom Lane
• 15:26   Re: Re: Ready to release? The Hermit Hacker
• 15:28   Re: logging problem ... ? Tom Lane
• 15:35   Re: So we're in agreement.... Philip Warner
• 15:43   Re: So we're in agreement.... Tom Lane
• 15:55   Re: So we're in agreement.... The Hermit Hacker
• 16:01   Re: logging problem ... ? The Hermit Hacker
• 16:09   Re: So we're in agreement.... Tom Lane
• 16:24   Re: logging problem ... ? Tom Lane
• 16:28   kerberos 5 patch against 7.0RC5 Mike Wyer
• 16:30   Re: logging problem ... ? The Hermit Hacker
• 16:36   Re: logging problem ... ? Tom Lane
• 16:47   Re: logging problem ... ? The Hermit Hacker
• 18:11   7.0 key features Tom Lane
• 18:18   Re: 7.0 key features Tom Lane
• 18:23   Re: 7.0 key features Mitch Vincent
• 18:25   Re: 7.0 key features Tom Lane
• 18:27   Re: 7.0 key features The Hermit Hacker
• 19:16   Re: 7.0 key features Vince Vielhaber
• 19:33   Re: 7.0 key features darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 19:38   Re: 7.0 key features Vince Vielhaber
• 19:43   Re: 7.0 key features Hannu Krosing
• 19:49   TEXT question... Was 7.0 key features Mitch Vincent
• 19:54   Re: 7.0 key features Hannu Krosing
• 22:01   Re: TEXT question... Was 7.0 key features Hannu Krosing
• 22:01   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Tom Lane
• 22:03   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Peter Eisentraut
• 22:04   Re: Re: Ready to release? Hannu Krosing
• 22:05   Re: 7.0 key features darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 22:55   Re: Re: 7.0 key features Bruce Momjian
• 23:25   Re: USE_SYSLOG ... useless? :) Lamar Owen

9 May 2000

• 04:00   RE: Notice in logg file Hiroshi Inoue
• 04:28   Re: 7.0 key features Thomas Lockhart
• 06:50   RE: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passw ords. Magnus Hagander
• 10:45   Re: So we're in agreement.... Sevo Stille
• 11:29   Re: 7.0 key features Bruce Momjian
• 12:25   hey ... Sergio A. Kessler
• 12:38   Re: 7.0 key features Thomas Lockhart
• 12:53   v7.0 release Thomas Lockhart
• 13:00   Re: 7.0 key features Vince Vielhaber
• 13:22   Commercializing PostgreSQL: What do you thing? Cary O'Brien
• 13:32   Shouldn't flush dirty buffers at shutdown ? Hiroshi Inoue
• 13:49   Re: Shouldn't flush dirty buffers at shutdown ? Tom Lane
• 14:04   Re: Commercializing PostgreSQL: What do you thing? Tom Lane
• 14:38   inheritance and primary and foreign keys Robert B. Easter
• 15:44   She's out the door ... The Hermit Hacker
• 16:03   MD5 Vince Vielhaber
• 16:12   RE: Shouldn't flush dirty buffers at shutdown ? Hiroshi Inoue
• 16:20   Re: Shouldn't flush dirty buffers at shutdown ? Tom Lane
• 16:26   RE: Shouldn't flush dirty buffers at shutdown ? Mikheev, Vadim
• 16:28   Re: MD5 Tom Lane
• 16:46   Re: MD5 Hannu Krosing
• 17:19   Re: Commercializing PostgreSQL: What do you thing? Daniel Kalchev
• 17:26   Re: Commercializing PostgreSQL: What do you thing? Marc G. Fournier
• 17:48   misc questions Jeff MacDonald
• 18:03   Primary Key on Inherited Table Wenjin Zheng
• 19:39   Re: misc questions Tom Lane
• 19:47   Re: Re: Ready to release? Peter Eisentraut
• 19:47   Re: CREATE DATABASE WITH OWNER '??'; Peter Eisentraut
• 19:48   Re: logging problem ... ? Peter Eisentraut
• 19:52   Re: CREATE DATABASE WITH OWNER '??'; Peter Eisentraut
• 19:52   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Peter Eisentraut
• 19:56   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Tom Lane
• 20:04   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Henry B. Hotz
• 20:10   Re: Primary Key on Inherited Table Tom Lane
• 20:14   Re: misc questions The Hermit Hacker
• 20:18   Re: CREATE DATABASE WITH OWNER '??'; The Hermit Hacker
• 20:20   Re: CREATE DATABASE WITH OWNER '??'; The Hermit Hacker
• 20:28   Re: You're on SecurityFocus.com for the cleartext passwords. Tom Lane
• 20:37   Groups and schemas (was: You're on SecurityFocus.com...) Oliver Elphick
• 21:19   Re: CREATE DATABASE WITH OWNER '??'; Tom Lane
• 22:31   RE: Shouldn't flush dirty buffers at shutdown ? Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:11   RE: Shouldn't flush dirty buffers at shutdown ? Mikheev, Vadim

10 May 2000

• 00:14   Re: [SQL] Mail problems The Hermit Hacker
• 02:14   Not using index Daniele Orlandi
• 02:21   RE: Shouldn't flush dirty buffers at shutdown ? Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:44   Re: [GENERAL] Problems compiling version 7 Tom Lane
• 02:48   Re: Shouldn't flush dirty buffers at shutdown ? Tom Lane
• 04:32   RE: Shouldn't flush dirty buffers at shutdown ? Hiroshi Inoue
• 04:42   Re: misc questions Thomas Lockhart
• 05:20   Re: Not using index Tom Lane
• 06:47   Comparison PostgreSQL 7.0 vs. Interbase2000 Michael Meskes
• 06:54   Oops! Searching mailing lists... Kaare Rasmussen
• 07:26   Re: Michael Robinson
• 08:23   Re: pgsql/php3/apache authentication Malcolm Beattie
• 09:19   Re: Primary Key on Inherited Table Hannu Krosing
• 09:37   Re: Comparison PostgreSQL 7.0 vs. Interbase2000 (fwd) Kaare Rasmussen
• 10:18   Re: MD5 Vince Vielhaber
• 10:50   Re: CREATE DATABASE WITH OWNER '??'; The Hermit Hacker
• 10:50   Re: CREATE DATABASE WITH OWNER '??'; The Hermit Hacker
• 10:55   Re: Comparison PostgreSQL 7.0 vs. Interbase2000 (fwd) The Hermit Hacker
• 10:57   setproctitle() no longer used? The Hermit Hacker
• 11:04   Re: Comparison PostgreSQL 7.0 vs. Interbase2000 (fwd) Kaare Rasmussen
• 11:20   Re: Comparison PostgreSQL 7.0 vs. Interbase2000 (fwd) The Hermit Hacker
• 12:06   lsof: can't read inpcb at 0x00000000 The Hermit Hacker
• 12:43   pg_hba.conf && ident ... The Hermit Hacker
• 12:43   Re: CREATE DATABASE WITH OWNER '??'; Hannu Krosing
• 13:04   FTP site Thomas Lockhart
• 13:07   Multibyte still broken Michael Robinson
• 13:24   Re: pgsql/php3/apache authentication Ross J. Reedstrom
• 13:29   Re: pg_hba.conf && ident ... Tom Lane
• 13:35   Re: pg_hba.conf && ident ... The Hermit Hacker
• 13:48   Re: pgsql/php3/apache authentication The Hermit Hacker
• 14:10   Re: Multibyte still broken Tom Lane
• 14:53   Re: pg_hba.conf && ident ... Malcolm Beattie
• 14:55   Great, big errors ... Again. Mitch Vincent
• 15:01   Re: pg_hba.conf && ident ... The Hermit Hacker
• 15:06   Re: Re: [GENERAL] Problems compiling version 7 Tom Lane
• 15:11   Re: pg_hba.conf && ident ... Tom Lane
• 15:29   Re: pg_hba.conf && ident ... Malcolm Beattie
• 15:29   Re: MD5 Peter Eisentraut
• 15:39   Re: MD5 Tom Lane
• 15:45   Re: pg_hba.conf && ident ... Tom Lane
• 16:03   Re: Great, big errors ... Again. The Hermit Hacker
• 16:03   Re: Primary Key on Inherited Table Robert B. Easter
• 16:05   Re: Great, big errors ... Again. Mitch Vincent
• 18:30   Is 7.0 up? G. Anthony Reina
• 18:46   Re: Is 7.0 up? Vince Vielhaber
• 18:58   Re: Is 7.0 up? Bruce Momjian
• 19:24   Re: v7.0 release Lamar Owen
• 20:21   Re: setproctitle() no longer used? Peter Eisentraut
• 20:21   Re: CREATE DATABASE WITH OWNER '??'; Peter Eisentraut
• 20:26   Re: CREATE DATABASE WITH OWNER '??'; Peter Eisentraut
• 20:26   Re: Re: [GENERAL] Problems compiling version 7 Peter Eisentraut
• 20:37   Re: setproctitle() no longer used? Bruce Momjian
• 21:04   Unable to get acceptable performance from EXCEPT Alfred Perlstein
• 21:18   Re: setproctitle() no longer used? The Hermit Hacker
• 21:25   Re: Re: [GENERAL] Problems compiling version 7 Tom Lane
• 21:32   Re: setproctitle() no longer used? Bruce Momjian
• 21:39   Re: Unable to get acceptable performance from EXCEPT Tom Lane
• 21:59   Re: setproctitle() no longer used? Vince Vielhaber
• 22:04   Re: setproctitle() no longer used? Bruce Momjian
• 22:06   Re: setproctitle() no longer used? Vince Vielhaber
• 22:09   Re: setproctitle() no longer used? Bruce Momjian
• 22:41   Re: Unable to get acceptable performance from EXCEPT Alfred Perlstein
• 22:48   Re: setproctitle() no longer used? Vince Vielhaber
• 22:58   Re: setproctitle() no longer used? Bruce Momjian
• 23:07   Re: setproctitle() no longer used? Vince Vielhaber
• 23:13   Re: setproctitle() no longer used? Bruce Momjian
• 23:16   Re: setproctitle() no longer used? Vince Vielhaber
• 23:23   Re: setproctitle() no longer used? Bruce Momjian
• 23:40   Re: setproctitle() no longer used? Vince Vielhaber
• 23:59   Re: misc questions Tom Lane

11 May 2000

• 00:02   Re: Multibyte still broken Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:09   Re: Not using index Daniele Orlandi
• 00:43   Now 376175 lines of code Bruce Momjian
• 02:29   Patches list broken? Bruce Momjian
• 03:03   Re: Patches list broken? The Hermit Hacker
• 03:08   Fix for plpgsql and timestamp/interval Bruce Momjian
• 03:27   Re: Patches to fix compilations on NetBSD Bruce Momjian
• 03:29   Re: kerberos 5 patch against 7.0RC5 Bruce Momjian
• 04:24   Re: Primary Key on Inherited Table Tom Lane
• 04:38   Re: Re: [GENERAL] Problems compiling version 7 - solved Tom Lane
• 04:46   Re: Now 376175 lines of code Tom Lane
• 04:48   Re: misc questions Thomas Lockhart
• 04:53   Re: Patches list broken? Tom Lane
• 05:05   Re: Re: Patches to fix compilations on NetBSD Tom Lane
• 05:10   Re: Re: kerberos 5 patch against 7.0RC5 Tom Lane
• 05:27   Re: misc questions Tom Lane
• 05:48   FETCH help SAKAIDA Masaaki
• 09:43   message in logs Vince Vielhaber
• 09:54   Re: Patches list broken? Patrick Welche
• 10:00   COPY BINARY to STDOUT SAKAIDA Masaaki
• 10:50   Re: setproctitle() no longer used? The Hermit Hacker
• 10:53   Re: Patches list broken? The Hermit Hacker
• 10:58   Re: Patches list broken? The Hermit Hacker
• 12:19   query results different in v7.0 vs v6.5.3 ... The Hermit Hacker
• 13:09   Re: Multibyte still broken Michael Robinson
• 13:25   AW: query results different in v7.0 vs v6.5.3 ... Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 13:48   Re: Now 376175 lines of code Bruce Momjian
• 13:55   Re: Multibyte still broken Thomas Lockhart
• 13:58   Re: Multibyte still broken Tatsuo Ishii
• 14:24   Re: Now 376175 lines of code Ross J. Reedstrom
• 14:27   Re: setproctitle() no longer used? Bruce Momjian
• 14:30   Re: setproctitle() no longer used? Bruce Momjian
• 14:33   Re: setproctitle() no longer used? Bruce Momjian
• 14:39   Re: Multibyte still broken Tatsuo Ishii
• 14:50   Re: Multibyte still broken Michael Robinson
• 14:56   Eternal vacuuming.... Tim Perdue
• 15:15   Re: Eternal vacuuming.... Thomas Lockhart
• 15:28   Re: Some CVS stuff, A 7.0-stable branch? and a mailing list? The Hermit Hacker
• 15:33   Re: Eternal vacuuming.... Tim Perdue
• 15:39   Re: Eternal vacuuming.... Alfred Perlstein
• 16:02   Re: Multibyte still broken Bruce Momjian
• 16:04   Orphaned locks in 7.0? Alfred Perlstein
• 16:12   Re: query results different in v7.0 vs v6.5.3 ... Tom Lane
• 16:25   Re: Eternal vacuuming.... Marc G. Fournier
• 16:29   Re: Eternal vacuuming.... Bruce Momjian
• 16:31   User's Lounge and Developer's Corner Vince Vielhaber
• 16:34   Re: User's Lounge and Developer's Corner Benjamin Adida
• 16:42   Re: User's Lounge and Developer's Corner Marc G. Fournier
• 16:49   Re: User's Lounge and Developer's Corner Bruce Momjian
• 16:52   Re: FETCH help Bruce Momjian
• 16:56   Re: User's Lounge and Developer's Corner Marc G. Fournier
• 16:56   Re: Orphaned locks in 7.0? Tom Lane
• 16:59   Re: Multibyte still broken Michael Robinson
• 17:04   Re: Multibyte still broken Michael Robinson
• 17:04   Re: Multibyte still broken Bruce Momjian
• 17:17   Re: Orphaned locks in 7.0? Alfred Perlstein
• 17:50   Pgsql core contract? Alfred Perlstein
• 18:02   Re: Eternal vacuuming.... Tim Perdue
• 18:04   Re: Eternal vacuuming.... Marc G. Fournier

15 May 2000

• 16:39   Re: Proposal: replace no-overwrite with Berkeley DB The Hermit Hacker
• 16:41   JDBC 7.0 binaries Peter Mount
• 16:45   Re: Casting, again Thomas Lockhart
• 16:48   Re: Proposal: replace no-overwrite with Berkeley DB Benjamin Adida
• 16:54   Re: Casting, again Bruce Momjian
• 16:57   Re: Casting, again Thomas Lockhart
• 16:57   Re: type conversion discussion Tom Lane
• 17:04   Re: AW: type conversion discussion Tom Lane
• 17:07   Re: Cast of numeric() Bruce Momjian
• 17:10   Re: Proposal for fixing numeric type-resolution issues Thomas Lockhart
• 17:14   RE: [INTERFACES] lo_unlink Peter Mount
• 17:17   Re: Proposal: replace no-overwrite with Berkeley DB Bruce Momjian
• 17:18   Re: Binary cursor across computers with differentarchitectures G. Anthony Reina
• 17:21   Re: Casting, again Tom Lane
• 17:22   Re: Orphaned locks in 7.0? Alfred Perlstein
• 17:23   Re: AW: type conversion discussion Tom Lane
• 17:24   Re: Casting, again Tom Lane
• 17:27   Re: Proposal: replace no-overwrite with Berkeley DB Hannu Krosing
• 17:31   Re: Proposal: replace no-overwrite with Berkeley DB Bruce Momjian
• 17:31   Re: Proposal: replace no-overwrite with Berkeley DB The Hermit Hacker
• 17:34   Re: Cast of numeric() Thomas Lockhart
• 17:44   FTP-sever ftp.postgresql.org unable to get dir-list ? Frank G Hahn
• 17:48   broken links on http://www.postgresql.org/doxlist.html Jim Mercer
• 17:53   Re: Proposal for fixing numeric type-resolution issues Peter Eisentraut
• 17:53   Re: Casting, again Peter Eisentraut
• 17:59   Re: Cast of numeric() Peter Eisentraut
• 18:06   Re: type conversion discussion Peter Eisentraut
• 18:06   RE: WAL versus Postgres (or: what goes around, comes ar ound) Mikheev, Vadim
• 18:11   Re: FTP-sever ftp.postgresql.org unable to get dir-list ? Tom Lane
• 18:17   Re: broken links on http://www.postgresql.org/doxlist.html Vince Vielhaber
• 18:17   Re: FTP-sever ftp.postgresql.org unable to get dir-list ? Vince Vielhaber
• 18:37   Re: Proposal: replace no-overwrite with Berkeley DB Tom Lane
• 18:43   Re: FTP-sever ftp.postgresql.org unable to get dir-list ? The Hermit Hacker
• 18:51   Re: type conversion discussion Tom Lane
• 18:58   Re: Proposal: replace no-overwrite with Berkeley DB Bruce Momjian
• 19:29   RE: WAL versus Postgres (or: what goes around, comes ar ound) Mikheev, Vadim
• 19:32   RE: Proposal: replace no-overwrite with Berkeley DB Mikheev, Vadim
• 19:42   RE: WAL versus Postgres (or: what goes around, comes ar ound) Mikheev, Vadim
• 19:45   RE: Proposal: replace no-overwrite with Berkeley DB Mikheev, Vadim
• 21:30   reading row in backend Patrick Welche
• 21:57   Re: reading row in backend Tom Lane
• 22:10   Re: reading row in backend Patrick Welche
• 22:26   Re: reading row in backend Tom Lane
• 22:37   Re: reading row in backend Patrick Welche
• 23:02   Re: Proposal: replace no-overwrite with Berkeley DB Philip Warner
• 23:05   Insertion of index tuples are necessary ? Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:30   Re: Proposal: replace no-overwrite with Berkeley DB Bruce Momjian
• 23:44   Re: reading row in backend Tom Lane
• 23:47   Re: Berkeley DB license terms (was Re: Proposal...) Michael A. Olson

16 May 2000

• 00:00   Re: Insertion of index tuples are necessary ? Tom Lane
• 00:17   Re: Berkeley DB license terms (was Re: Proposal...) Bruce Momjian
• 00:18   Re: Casting, again Thomas Lockhart
• 00:32   Re: Berkeley DB license terms (was Re: Proposal...) Michael A. Olson
• 00:32   Re: Proposal: replace no-overwrite with Berkeley DB Thomas Lockhart
• 00:36   Re: Berkeley DB license terms (was Re: Proposal...) Michael A. Olson
• 00:41   Re: Berkeley DB license terms (was Re: Proposal...) The Hermit Hacker
• 00:42   Re: Berkeley DB license terms (was Re: Proposal...) Bruce Momjian
• 00:49   Re: Berkeley DB license terms (was Re: Proposal...) The Hermit Hacker
• 00:54   Re: broken links on http://www.postgresql.org/doxlist.html Thomas Lockhart
• 01:05   Re: Berkeley DB license terms (was Re: Proposal...) Michael A. Olson
• 01:05   Re: broken links on http://www.postgresql.org/doxlist.html Vince Vielhaber
• 01:05   Re: Proposal: replace no-overwrite with Berkeley DB Tom Lane
• 01:10   Re: Berkeley DB license terms (was Re: Proposal...) Bruce Momjian
• 01:47   Re: Berkeley DB license terms (was Re: Proposal...) Tom Lane
• 01:49   Re: Berkeley DB license terms (was Re: Proposal...) Bruce Momjian
• 01:56   RPMS for 7.0 final. Lamar Owen
• 03:54   Re: PostgreSQL and Unicode Tatsuo Ishii
• 04:19   Re: Proposal: replace no-overwrite with Berkeley DB Adam Haberlach
• 05:31   Problems with the new Majordomo 2. Gene Sokolov
• 06:04   Re: WAL versus Postgres (or: what goes around, comes ar ound) Daniel Kalchev
• 06:09   RE: PostgreSQL and Unicode Tatsuo Ishii
• 07:01   RE: PostgreSQL and Unicode Tatsuo Ishii
• 07:18   ODBC & v7.0(Rel) Errors with Users and Databases Dave Page
• 08:31   RE: PostgreSQL and Unicode Tatsuo Ishii
• 08:43   Re: reading row in backend Patrick Welche
• 10:56   Re: Problems with the new Majordomo 2. The Hermit Hacker
• 11:21   Re: RPMS for 7.0 final. Lamar Owen
• 12:32   RE: Actually it's a bufmgr issue (was Re: Another pg_listener issue) Hiroshi Inoue
• 12:37   Re: [PORTS] Linux/Alpha and PostgreSQL 7.0 Release Status Ryan Kirkpatrick
• 12:59   Berkeley DB license Michael A. Olson
• 13:19   Re: RE: PostgreSQL and Unicode Tom Lane
• 13:20   Re: [PORTS] RPMS for 7.0 final. Thomas Lockhart
• 13:29   Re: Berkeley DB license Philip Warner
• 13:30   Re: Problems with the new Majordomo 2. Tom Lane
• 13:35   Re: Actually it's a bufmgr issue (was Re: Another pg_listener issue) Tom Lane
• 13:47   Re: Berkeley DB license Michael A. Olson
• 14:03   Re: Berkeley DB license Bruce Momjian
• 15:06   Re: Berkeley DB license The Hermit Hacker
• 15:09   Re: Problems with the new Majordomo 2. The Hermit Hacker
• 15:24   Re: Berkeley DB license Bruce Momjian
• 15:29   Re: Berkeley DB license Michael A. Olson
• 15:32   RE: Berkeley DB license Mikheev, Vadim
• 15:33   Re: Berkeley DB license Brian E Gallew
• 15:37   RE: Actually it's a bufmgr issue (was Re: Another pg_listener issue) Hiroshi Inoue
• 15:58   Re: Actually it's a bufmgr issue (was Re: Another pg_listener issue) Tom Lane
• 16:50   Re: Berkeley DB license The Hermit Hacker
• 16:54   Re: Berkeley DB license Bruce Momjian
• 16:56   Re: Berkeley DB license Bruce Momjian
• 17:18   RE: Berkeley DB license Mikheev, Vadim
• 17:28   Re: type conversion discussion Peter Eisentraut
• 17:28   SET type (was Re: WAL versus Postgres) Peter Eisentraut
• 17:33   Re: Berkeley DB license Bruce Momjian
• 17:33   Re: Berkeley DB license Bruce Momjian
• 17:56   RE: Berkeley DB license Mikheev, Vadim
• 20:16   RE: Berkeley DB license Michael A. Olson
• 20:30   Re: Berkeley DB license Hannu Krosing
• 20:41   Re: type conversion discussion Tom Lane
• 22:11   RE: Actually it's a bufmgr issue (was Re: Another pg_listener issue) Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:31   Re: Casting, again Raul Chirea
• 23:38   Re: Berkeley DB license Michael A. Olson

17 May 2000

• 00:05   Re: Berkeley DB license Michael A. Olson
• 00:08   Re: RE: PostgreSQL and Unicode Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:37   Re: Berkeley DB license Michael A. Olson
• 00:51   Re: Berkeley DB license Bruce Momjian
• 02:13   Re: Berkeley DB license Mike Mascari
• 02:14   Re: Berkeley DB license Bruce Momjian
• 02:31   Re: Berkeley DB license Philip Warner
• 03:03   Re: Berkeley DB license Alfred Perlstein
• 03:18   Re: Berkeley DB license Tom Lane
• 03:28   Trigger function languages Bruce Momjian
• 04:50   Re: SET type (was Re: WAL versus Postgres) Tom Lane
• 05:40   Re: Problems with the new Majordomo 2. Gene Sokolov
• 08:27   Re: Berkeley DB license Hannu Krosing
• 09:51   Re: Problems with the new Majordomo 2. Vince Vielhaber
• 10:40   Re: Problems with the new Majordomo 2. Gene Sokolov
• 10:57   Re: Berkeley DB license terms (was Re: Proposal...) teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 12:40   Re: RE: PostgreSQL and Unicode Kardos, Dr. Andreas
• 12:47   Re: RE: PostgreSQL and Unicode Tatsuo Ishii
• 13:26   7.0 RPMS and syslog problem. Michael Schout
• 13:32   Re: Berkeley DB license Benjamin Adida
• 13:45   Re: 7.0 RPMS and syslog problem. (more) Michael Schout
• 14:13   OO Patch Chris
• 15:00   Re: 7.0 RPMS and syslog problem. (more) Tom Lane
• 15:02   Re: OO Patch Bruce Momjian
• 15:27   MSSQL7 & PostgreSQL 7.0 Peter Mount
• 15:35   Ouch .. VACUUM *is* killer ... The Hermit Hacker
• 15:45   Re: MSSQL7 & PostgreSQL 7.0 Bruce Momjian
• 15:48   Re: Ouch .. VACUUM *is* killer ... The Hermit Hacker
• 15:55   Re: Ouch .. VACUUM *is* killer ... Mitch Vincent
• 15:59   Re: 7.0 RPMS and syslog problem. (more) Lamar Owen
• 16:07   Using triggers with non-C functions Bruce Momjian
• 16:14   Re: ODBC & v7.0(Rel) Errors with Users and Databases Peter Eisentraut
• 16:16   Re: Proposal for fixing numeric type-resolution issues Peter Eisentraut
• 16:16   Re: AW: type conversion discussion Peter Eisentraut
• 16:27   Re: type conversion discussion Peter Eisentraut
• 16:37   RE: Berkeley DB license Mikheev, Vadim
• 17:24   RE: Berkeley DB license Michael A. Olson
• 18:46   question about index cost estimates Jeff Hoffmann
• 21:01   Re: OO Patch Peter Eisentraut
• 21:04   Re: type conversion discussion Peter Eisentraut
• 21:08   Re: question about index cost estimates Tom Lane
• 21:53   Re: 7.0 RPMS and syslog problem. (more) Michael Schout
• 22:30   Re: type conversion discussion Tom Lane
• 22:46   table level locking different in 7.0? Jim Mercer
• 23:09   Re: Proposal for fixing numeric type-resolution issues Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:20   Re: table level locking different in 7.0? Tom Lane
• 23:39   RE: table level locking different in 7.0? Mikheev, Vadim
• 23:41   Re: table level locking different in 7.0? Tom Lane
• 23:56   Re: table level locking different in 7.0? Jim Mercer
• 23:58   Re: question about index cost estimates Jeff Hoffmann

18 May 2000

• 00:58   Re: table level locking different in 7.0? Tom Lane
• 01:32   Re: table level locking different in 7.0? Bruce Momjian
• 01:34   Re: table level locking different in 7.0? Bruce Momjian
• 01:35   Re: question about index cost estimates Tom Lane
• 02:26   Re: AW: type conversion discussion Tom Lane
• 02:41   Re: 7.0 RPMS and syslog problem. (more) Lamar Owen
• 02:41   RE: question about index cost estimates Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:33   Re: question about index cost estimates Jeff Hoffmann
• 03:42   Re: Trigger function languages ts
• 03:48   Re: question about index cost estimates Jeff Hoffmann
• 04:03   Re: question about index cost estimates Tom Lane
• 04:14   Re: question about index cost estimates Tom Lane
• 04:40   Re: Proposal for fixing numeric type-resolution issues Thomas Lockhart
• 04:49   Re: question about index cost estimates Tom Lane
• 06:28   RE: ODBC & v7.0(Rel) Errors with Users and Databases Dave Page
• 06:30   AW: question about index cost estimates Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 06:35   RE: MSSQL7 & PostgreSQL 7.0 Dave Page
• 06:41   Re: AW: question about index cost estimates Tom Lane
• 06:43   RE: question about index cost estimates Hiroshi Inoue
• 06:53   Re: Trigger function languages Hannu Krosing
• 07:01   Re: Trigger function languages ts
• 07:51   RE: MSSQL7 & PostgreSQL 7.0 Peter Mount
• 07:56   LONG: How to migrate data from MS-SQL7 to PostgreSQL 7.0 Peter Mount
• 08:44   Re: MSSQL7 & PostgreSQL 7.0 Joe Shevland
• 09:30   RE: MSSQL7 & PostgreSQL 7.0 Dave Page
• 10:10   RE: MSSQL7 & PostgreSQL 7.0 Peter Mount
• 13:26   Re: question about index cost estimates Tom Lane
• 14:21   Re: LONG: How to migrate data from MS-SQL7 to PostgreSQL 7.0 Thomas Lockhart
• 14:37   Re: ODBC & v7.0(Rel) Errors with Users and Databases Thomas Lockhart
• 14:44   Re: LONG: How to migrate data from MS-SQL7 to PostgreSQL 7.0 Bruce Momjian
• 14:46   RE: LONG: How to migrate data from MS-SQL7 to PostgreSQ L 7.0 Peter Mount
• 14:59   Re: question about index cost estimates Jeff Hoffmann
• 15:02   failing over with postgresql Todd M. Shrider
• 15:08   Re: question about index cost estimates Tom Lane
• 15:15   RE: AW: question about index cost estimates Hiroshi Inoue
• 15:30   Re: AW: question about index cost estimates Tom Lane
• 15:34   The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server) Alessio Bragadini
• 16:14   Re: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server) Bruce Momjian
• 16:29   Re: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server) The Hermit Hacker
• 16:45   Re: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server) Benjamin Adida
• 17:11   Re: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server) The Hermit Hacker
• 17:45   Re: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server) Alfred Perlstein
• 17:57   Re: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server) The Hermit Hacker
• 18:00   Re: question about index cost estimates Jeff Hoffmann
• 18:09   Re: Trigger function languages Alex Perel
• 18:10   Re: Using triggers with non-C functions Alex Perel
• 22:42   Re: LONG: How to migrate data from MS-SQL7 to PostgreSQL 7.0 Cary O'Brien
• 22:57   Re: [SQL] Foreign keys breaks tables permissions Tom Lane
• 23:07   Re: [GENERAL] Question about databases in alternate locations... Peter Eisentraut
• 23:14   Re: [GENERAL] initdb and "exit_nicely"... Peter Eisentraut
• 23:59   HEADS UP: CVSROOT location changed ... The Hermit Hacker

19 May 2000

• 02:01   Re: [SQL] Foreign keys breaks tables permissions Stephan Szabo
• 02:32   Re: Actually it's a bufmgr issue (was Re: Another pg_listener issue) Tom Lane
• 02:39   Re: [SQL] Foreign keys breaks tables permissions Tom Lane
• 02:39   Re: AW: type conversion discussion Peter Eisentraut
• 02:39   Re: OO Patch Peter Eisentraut
• 02:45   Re: type conversion discussion Peter Eisentraut
• 02:47   Re: type conversion discussion Tom Lane
• 02:52   Re: AW: type conversion discussion Tom Lane
• 03:16   Re: OO Patch Tom Lane
• 03:44   Re: OO Patch Chris Bitmead
• 03:45   [Fwd: OO Patch] Chris Bitmead
• 04:07   OO / fe-be protocol Chris Bitmead
• 04:10   Re: OO Patch Tom Lane
• 04:35   Re: OO Patch Chris Bitmead
• 04:56   Re: Heaps of read() syscalls by the postmaster Matthias Urlichs
• 05:36   Re: OO Stuff Chris Bitmead
• 05:57   RE: LONG: How to migrate data from MS-SQL7 to PostgreSQ L 7.0 Peter Mount
• 06:11   Re: Re: Heaps of read() syscalls by the postmaster Matthias Urlichs
• 06:39   Re: OO Patch Hannu Krosing
• 07:27   RE: OO Patch Andrzej Mazurkiewicz
• 07:34   Re: OO / fe-be protocol Hannu Krosing
• 07:55   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Hannu Krosing
• 08:15   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Matthias Urlichs
• 08:57   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Chris
• 08:57   RE: Re: Heaps of read() syscalls by the postmaster Hiroshi Inoue
• 09:11   Re: Re: Heaps of read() syscalls by the postmaster Matthias Urlichs
• 09:18   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Matthias Urlichs
• 09:37   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Chris
• 09:40   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Matthias Urlichs
• 09:42   Re: query cache (was: Re: caching query results) Karel Zak
• 09:45   RE: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Hiroshi Inoue
• 09:57   -devel-7.0-1.rpm: Still missing a lots of headers Peter Vazsonyi
• 10:08   Re: Re: Heaps of read() syscalls by the postmaster Chris
• 10:08   Re: Re: Heaps of read() syscalls by the postmaster Hannu Krosing
• 10:09   malloc() in Dllist Karel Zak
• 10:10   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Hiroshi Inoue
• 10:27   Re: Re: [SQL] Foreign keys breaks tables permissions Hiroshi Inoue
• 10:41   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Matthias Urlichs
• 10:51   Re: Re: Heaps of read() syscalls by the postmaster Matthias Urlichs
• 10:53   Re: Re: Heaps of read() syscalls by the postmaster Matthias Urlichs
• 11:05   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Matthias Urlichs
• 11:41   Re: OO Patch The Hermit Hacker
• 11:44   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) The Hermit Hacker
• 11:48   Re: Postgres Problemo... Tatsuo Ishii
• 11:49   Re: Re: Heaps of read() syscalls by the postmaster The Hermit Hacker
• 12:40   Re: [GENERAL] Question about databases in alternate locations... Thomas Lockhart
• 12:43   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Mitch Vincent
• 12:44   Re: OO Patch Chris
• 12:53   Re: OO Patch Hannu Krosing
• 13:01   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Matthias Urlichs
• 13:11   Re: Re: Heaps of read() syscalls by the postmaster Tom Lane
• 13:17   Re: Re: Heaps of read() syscalls by the postmaster Matthias Urlichs
• 13:17   Re: OO Patch Chris
• 13:19   Re: OO Patch The Hermit Hacker
• 13:21   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Chris
• 13:22   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Michael A. Olson
• 13:25   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Tom Lane
• 13:31   Re: OO Patch Chris
• 14:00   Re: Re: [SQL] Foreign keys breaks tables permissions Hannu Krosing
• 14:11   Re: OO Patch Hannu Krosing
• 14:32   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Bruce Momjian
• 14:33   Re: Re: Heaps of read() syscalls by the postmaster Bruce Momjian
• 14:33   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Bruce Momjian
• 15:20   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Tom Lane
• 15:20   Re: Re: [SQL] Foreign keys breaks tables permissions Hannu Krosing
• 15:26   Re: [GENERAL] Question about databases in alternate locations... Richard J. Kuhns
• 15:41   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Tom Lane
• 15:55   CVS commit broken Bruce Momjian
• 15:55   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Bruce Momjian
• 15:57   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Michael A. Olson
• 16:06   Re: OO Patch Ross J. Reedstrom
• 16:15   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Bruce Momjian
• 16:34   Re: AW: question about index cost estimates Peter Eisentraut
• 16:35   Re: [SQL] Foreign keys breaks tables permissions Peter Eisentraut
• 16:36   Re: HEADS UP: CVSROOT location changed ... Peter Eisentraut
• 16:38   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Tom Lane
• 16:40   Re: question about index cost estimates Peter Eisentraut
• 16:53   Re: [SQL] Foreign keys breaks tables permissions Tom Lane
• 16:55   Re: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server) Kaare Rasmussen
• 16:57   Re: CVS commit broken Tom Lane
• 16:58   Re: CVS commit broken The Hermit Hacker
• 16:59   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Bruce Momjian
• 17:03   Re: CVS commit broken Bruce Momjian
• 17:41   Re: CVS commit broken Bruce Momjian
• 17:47   Re: Re: Heaps of read() syscalls by the postmaster Tom Lane
• 17:58   Re: malloc() in Dllist Tom Lane
• 17:59   Re: Re: Heaps of read() syscalls by the postmaster Oleg Bartunov
• 18:02   n-dimensional r-tree opclasses ... The Hermit Hacker
• 18:32   Re: Re: Heaps of read() syscalls by the postmaster Matthias Urlichs
• 18:36   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Tom Lane
• 18:54   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Bruce Momjian
• 19:09   Re: Re: Heaps of read() syscalls by the postmaster Tom Lane
• 19:52   Re: OO / fe-be protocol Tom Lane
• 20:02   Re: [GENERAL] Question about databases in alternate locations... Thomas Lockhart
• 20:19   Re: OO Patch Tom Lane
• 20:23   Re: OO Patch Tom Lane
• 21:00   RE: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Hiroshi Inoue
• 21:32   Re: OO Patch Chris
• 21:43   Re: OO Patch Chris
• 21:43   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Tom Lane
• 21:43   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Tom Lane
• 21:53   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Tom Lane
• 21:55   Re: OO Patch Tom Lane
• 21:56   Re: OO / fe-be protocol Chris

20 May 2000

• 01:11   Sigh: 7.0 pg_dump fails if user table has index on OID Tom Lane
• 01:12   Re: Postgresql OO Patch Chris
• 01:18   Re: OO Patch Bruce Momjian
• 01:18   Re: OO Patch Tom Lane
• 01:20   Re: OO Patch Bruce Momjian
• 01:23   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Bruce Momjian
• 01:23   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Bruce Momjian
• 01:27   Re: OO Patch Chris
• 01:27   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Tom Lane
• 01:30   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Bruce Momjian
• 01:32   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Thomas Lockhart
• 02:55   Postgres Analysis Tool-Pak Mike Mascari
• 03:05   Re: OO / fe-be protocol Thomas Lockhart
• 03:14   Re: Berkeley DB license Bruce Momjian
• 03:31   Raw devices (was Re: Berkeley DB license) Alex Pilosov
• 03:43   Re: Raw devices (was Re: Berkeley DB license)u Bruce Momjian
• 03:48   Re: Raw devices (was Re: Berkeley DB license) Thomas Lockhart
• 04:22   Re: Raw devices (was Re: Berkeley DB license) Tom Lane
• 04:23   RE: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Hiroshi Inoue
• 04:24   RE: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Hiroshi Inoue
• 04:32   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Tom Lane
• 04:57   Re: OO Patch Chris
• 05:31   Re: Postgres Analysis Tool-Pak Tom Lane
• 06:28   contextual search Kate
• 06:57   Re: Raw devices (was Re: Berkeley DB license) Matthias Urlichs
• 07:03   Re: Re: Heaps of read() syscalls by the postmaster Matthias Urlichs
• 07:09   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Matthias Urlichs
• 09:14   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Matthias Urlichs
• 10:04   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Mike Mascari
• 10:31   Re: contextual search Bruce Momjian
• 10:32   Re: Raw devices (was Re: Berkeley DB license) Bruce Momjian
• 11:38   Re: [GENERAL] Re: Postgresql OO Patch Bruce Momjian
• 12:30   Re: OO Patch Peter Eisentraut
• 12:32   Re: [GENERAL] Question about databases in alternate locations... Peter Eisentraut
• 12:35   Re: type conversion discussion Peter Eisentraut
• 12:36   Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO) Peter Eisentraut
• 12:38   plpgsql chapter in docs Bruce Momjian
• 13:57   Re: OO Patch Chris
• 14:28   Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO) Chris
• 15:21   Re: contextual search Mitch Vincent
• 15:28   RE: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Hiroshi Inoue
• 16:02   Re: Berkeley DB license Michael A. Olson
• 17:08   Re: -devel-7.0-1.rpm: Still missing a lots of headers Lamar Owen
• 17:18   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Matthias Urlichs
• 17:55   Re: More Performance Matthias Urlichs
• 17:58   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Bruce Momjian
• 18:01   Re: -devel-7.0-1.rpm: Still missing a lots of headers Lamar Owen
• 18:32   Re: More Performance Bruce Momjian
• 19:27   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Matthias Urlichs
• 19:27   MySQL's "crashme" (was Re: Performance) Tom Lane
• 19:31   Re: More Performance Matthias Urlichs
• 19:40   Re: More Performance Matthias Urlichs
• 20:02   Re: More Performance Bruce Momjian
• 20:46   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Tom Lane
• 21:35   Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO) Robert B. Easter

21 May 2000

• 00:16   Re: More Performance Tom Lane
• 00:49   Berkeley DB... Mikheev, Vadim
• 01:02   Re: More Performance Bruce Momjian
• 01:02   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Bruce Momjian
• 01:37   Re: Re: Heaps of read() syscalls by the postmaster Tom Lane
• 02:07   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Matthias Urlichs
• 02:16   MySQL crashme test and PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 02:48   Re: MySQL crashme test and PostgreSQL Mike Mascari
• 03:05   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Matthias Urlichs
• 03:15   Re: Re: Heaps of read() syscalls by the postmaster Matthias Urlichs
• 03:23   PostgreSQL 7.0-2 RPMset released. Lamar Owen
• 03:27   Re: MySQL crashme test and PostgreSQL Matthias Urlichs
• 03:37   Re: MySQL crashme test and PostgreSQL Matthias Urlichs
• 03:47   Re: More Performance Tom Lane
• 05:25   Re: MySQL's "crashme" (was Re: Performance) Matthias Urlichs
• 06:59   Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO) Robert B. Easter
• 07:55   Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO) Chris
• 08:09   Re: OO Patch Marten Feldtmann
• 08:53   Re: MySQL's "crashme" (was Re: Performance) Kaare Rasmussen
• 11:05   Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO) Robert B. Easter
• 12:05   Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO) Chris Bitmead
• 12:29   Re: OO Patch Chris Bitmead
• 13:16   Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO) Robert B. Easter
• 13:34   Re: Re: MySQL crashme test and PostgreSQL Benjamin Adida
• 13:58   plperl and the dynamic loader Ragnar Hakonarson
• 15:06   Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO) Chris Bitmead
• 15:40   No more <> Peter Eisentraut
• 15:41   Re: [SQL] Foreign keys breaks tables permissions Peter Eisentraut
• 15:56   Re: Postgresql OO Patch Peter Eisentraut
• 16:10   Re: MySQL's "crashme" (was Re: Performance) Tom Lane
• 16:13   Re: [SQL] Foreign keys breaks tables permissions Tom Lane
• 16:35   Re: plperl and the dynamic loader Tom Lane
• 16:42   Re: No more <> Tom Lane
• 17:01   Re: [GENERAL] Re: MySQL crashme test and PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 17:31   Re: Re: MySQL crashme test and PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 17:44   Re: Berkeley DB... Michael A. Olson
• 17:47   Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Tom Lane
• 18:46   Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO) Hannu Krosing
• 18:54   Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO) Hannu Krosing
• 19:24   Re: OO Patch Hannu Krosing
• 19:38   Re: MySQL's "crashme" (was Re: Performance) Matthias Urlichs
• 21:02   RE: plperl and the dynamic loader Ragnar Hakonarson
• 22:13   Last call for comments: fmgr rewrite [LONG] Tom Lane
• 23:00   Re: Last call for comments: fmgr rewrite [LONG] Chris Bitmead
• 23:06   Re: Last call for comments: fmgr rewrite [LONG] Bruce Momjian
• 23:17   Re: Last call for comments: fmgr rewrite [LONG] Tom Lane
• 23:17   Re: Berkeley DB... Chris Bitmead
• 23:18   Re: Last call for comments: fmgr rewrite [LONG] Tom Lane
• 23:24   Re: Postgresql OO Patch Chris Bitmead

22 May 2000

• 00:09   Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO) Robert B. Easter
• 00:11   Re: Last call for comments: fmgr rewrite [LONG] Chris Bitmead
• 00:14   Re: Berkeley DB... Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:28   Re: Berkeley DB... Michael A. Olson
• 00:34   Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO) Chris Bitmead
• 00:52   RE: Berkeley DB... Mikheev, Vadim
• 01:23   Re: Berkeley DB... Bruce Momjian
• 02:05   RE: Berkeley DB... Mikheev, Vadim
• 02:12   Re: Berkeley DB... Bruce Momjian
• 02:15   RE: Berkeley DB... Mikheev, Vadim
• 02:29   Re: Last call for comments: fmgr rewrite [LONG] Tom Lane
• 02:51   Re: Last call for comments: fmgr rewrite [LONG] Chris Bitmead
• 03:09   Re: Last call for comments: fmgr rewrite [LONG] Tom Lane
• 03:12   Re: Berkeley DB... Michael A. Olson
• 03:19   Re: Last call for comments: fmgr rewrite [LONG] Bruce Momjian
• 03:31   Re: Last call for comments: fmgr rewrite [LONG] Chris Bitmead
• 03:47   Re: Last call for comments: fmgr rewrite [LONG] Tom Lane
• 03:49   Re: Last call for comments: fmgr rewrite [LONG] Chris Bitmead
• 04:17   Re: Last call for comments: fmgr rewrite [LONG] Tom Lane
• 05:15   Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO) Robert B. Easter
• 05:43   A test to add to the crashme test Michael Robinson
• 05:58   Re: A test to add to the crashme test Tom Lane
• 06:08   RE: OO / fe-be protocol Peter Mount
• 06:38   rolap Kaare Rasmussen
• 06:47   Re: A test to add to the crashme test Michael Robinson
• 06:48   Re: Postgresql OO Patch Robert B. Easter
• 07:42   Re: rolap Alfred Perlstein
• 08:10   Re: Last call for comments: fmgr rewrite [LONG] Hannu Krosing
• 08:22   Re: Postgresql OO Patch Chris Bitmead
• 08:23   Re: Last call for comments: fmgr rewrite [LONG] Hannu Krosing
• 08:29   Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO) Hannu Krosing
• 08:46   Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO) Chris Bitmead
• 08:48   Re: OO / fe-be protocol Kardos, Dr. Andreas
• 08:55   Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO) Hannu Krosing
• 08:58   Re: Postgresql OO Patch Hannu Krosing
• 09:02   Re: OO Patch Oliver Elphick
• 09:05   Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO) Chris Bitmead
• 09:09   Re: malloc() in Dllist Karel Zak
• 09:15   Re: [GENERAL] Re: Postgresql OO Patch Mike Mascari
• 09:33   Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO) Hannu Krosing
• 09:37   plperl Ragnar Hakonarson
• 10:20   Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO) Chris Bitmead
• 10:28   Re: [GENERAL] Re: Postgresql OO Patch Chris Bitmead
• 10:33   Re: OO Patch Chris Bitmead
• 12:18   Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO) Karl DeBisschop
• 12:19   SQL3 UNDER Chris Bitmead
• 14:39   Re: Last call for comments: fmgr rewrite [LONG] Tom Lane
• 15:02   Re: A test to add to the crashme test Ross J. Reedstrom
• 15:19   Re: libpq++ tracing considered harmfu[Fwd: libpq++ tracing considered harmful (was Re: [INTERFACES] libpq++ memory problems)] Tom Lane
• 16:21   Proposal for enhancements of privilege system Peter Eisentraut
• 17:19   Re: OO Patch Marten Feldtmann
• 17:20   Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO) Marten Feldtmann
• 19:22   Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO) Hannu Krosing
• 20:02   Re: OO Patch Oliver Elphick
• 20:54   Re: Last call for comments: fmgr rewrite [LONG] Peter Eisentraut
• 20:54   Re: [PORTS] Logging (was Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL 7.0-2 RPMset released.) Peter Eisentraut
• 21:11   Re: OO Patch Hannu Krosing
• 21:45   port v7.0 to SGI-IRIX-6.5.7/64 Murad Nayal
• 22:14   Re: [PORTS] Logging (was Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL 7.0-2 RPMset released.) Roderick A. Anderson
• 22:57   Re: [PORTS] Logging (was Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL 7.0-2 RPMset released.) Palle Girgensohn
• 23:03   Re: Proposal for enhancements of privilege system Tom Lane
• 23:06   Re: [BUGS] port v7.0 to SGI-IRIX-6.5.7/64 Bruce Momjian
• 23:15   Serious problem within authentication subsystem in 7.0 Matt Sullivan
• 23:31   Re: Proposal for enhancements of privilege system Bruce Momjian
• 23:53   Re: Proposal for enhancements of privilege system Chris Bitmead

23 May 2000

• 00:02   Re: OO Patch Chris Bitmead
• 00:12   Re: [BUGS] port v7.0 to SGI-IRIX-6.5.7/64 Tom Lane
• 00:40   Re: Serious problem within authentication subsystem in 7.0 Tom Lane
• 00:43   Re: OO Patch The Hermit Hacker
• 00:55   Re: Serious problem within authentication subsystem in 7.0 Matt Sullivan
• 00:57   MySQL crashme Bruce Momjian
• 01:06   syslog fix Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:38   Re: Serious problem within authentication subsystem in 7.0 Tom Lane
• 01:57   Re: [BUGS] port v7.0 to SGI-IRIX-6.5.7/64 Murad Nayal
• 02:18   Re: [BUGS] port v7.0 to SGI-IRIX-6.5.7/64 Murad Nayal
• 02:29   Re: OO Patch Chris Bitmead
• 03:04   Re: [BUGS] port v7.0 to SGI-IRIX-6.5.7/64 Tom Lane
• 03:36   ROLAP (was Re: A test to add to the crashme test) Michael Robinson
• 05:41   Re: A test to add to the crashme test Matthias Urlichs
• 05:50   Re: SQL3 UNDER Robert B. Easter
• 06:08   Re: SQL3 UNDER Chris Bitmead
• 06:35   Re: SQL3 UNDER Hannu Krosing
• 06:45   Re: A test to add to the crashme test Hannu Krosing
• 06:53   Re: SQL3 UNDER Robert B. Easter
• 06:58   Re: A test to add to the crashme test Matthias Urlichs
• 08:13   headers, who need to be installed Peter Vazsonyi
• 08:16   Re: CVS commit broken Karel Zak
• 08:18   Re: SQL3 UNDER Chris Bitmead
• 10:56   Re: SQL3 UNDER Robert B. Easter
• 11:17   Re: SQL3 UNDER Chris Bitmead
• 11:30   Re: SQL3 UNDER Chris Bitmead
• 11:59   Re: SQL3 UNDER Robert B. Easter
• 12:52   Re: SQL3 UNDER Chris Bitmead
• 13:14   Re: Serious problem within authentication subsystem in 7.0 Tom Lane
• 13:28   Re: SQL3 UNDER Robert B. Easter
• 13:33   Re: CVS commit broken Tom Lane
• 13:33   Re: ROLAP (was Re: A test to add to the crashme test) Ross J. Reedstrom
• 13:38   Re: syslog fix Tatsuo Ishii
• 13:45   Re: CVS commit broken Karel Zak
• 14:20   Re: CVS commit broken Bruce Momjian
• 14:59   Re: failing over with postgresql Kardos, Dr. Andreas
• 16:08   Re: SQL3 UNDER Hannu Krosing
• 19:37   Ignore, just testing ... The Hermit Hacker
• 19:41   Re: CVS commit broken The Hermit Hacker
• 19:42   Re: CVS commit broken The Hermit Hacker
• 20:14   New Lists ... The Hermit Hacker
• 20:33   Re: Proposal for enhancements of privilege system Peter Eisentraut
• 20:35   Re: Serious problem within authentication subsystem in 7.0 Peter Eisentraut
• 20:40   Re: New Lists ... Peter Eisentraut
• 21:00   Re: [GENERAL] Re: Postgresql OO Patch Marten Feldtmann
• 21:09   RE: New Lists ... Mikheev, Vadim
• 21:19   Re: Serious problem within authentication subsystem in 7.0 Tom Lane
• 21:32   Re: New Lists ... The Hermit Hacker
• 21:37   Re: New Lists ... The Hermit Hacker
• 21:48   setproctitle() Bruce Momjian
• 21:56   MySQL now supports transactions ... The Hermit Hacker
• 22:08   Re: setproctitle() The Hermit Hacker
• 22:20   Re: setproctitle() Alfred Perlstein
• 22:29   Re: setproctitle() Bruce Momjian
• 22:30   Re: setproctitle() Bruce Momjian
• 22:47   Re: SQL3 UNDER Chris Bitmead
• 23:01   Re: [GENERAL] Re: Postgresql OO Patch Chris Bitmead
• 23:02   Re: MySQL now supports transactions ... Ned Lilly
• 23:06   Re: SQL3 UNDER Chris Bitmead
• 23:14   setproctitle() Bruce Momjian
• 23:27   Re: MySQL now supports transactions ... Bruce Momjian
• 23:28   Re: MySQL now supports transactions ... Michael A. Olson
• 23:41   Re: MySQL now supports transactions ... The Hermit Hacker
• 23:43   Re: SQL3 UNDER Stephan Szabo
• 23:55   Re: SQL3 UNDER Chris Bitmead

24 May 2000

• 00:59   Plpsql vs. SQL functions Bruce Momjian
• 01:03   Fwd: Re: SQL3 UNDER Robert B. Easter
• 01:24   Re: Plpsql vs. SQL functions Alex Pilosov
• 01:32   Re: Plpsql vs. SQL functions Bruce Momjian
• 03:28   Re: setproctitle() Tom Lane
• 04:33   Re: setproctitle() Bruce Momjian
• 04:57   Re: [GENERAL] Re: Postgresql OO Patch Marten Feldtmann
• 05:33   Re: [GENERAL] Re: Postgresql OO Patch Chris Bitmead
• 07:37   yowch: dumpRules(): SELECT failed for table website. Alfred Perlstein
• 08:10   Re: yowch: dumpRules(): SELECT failed for table website. Alfred Perlstein
• 08:20   Re: yowch: dumpRules(): SELECT failed for table website. SL Baur
• 08:27   Re: yowch: dumpRules(): SELECT failed for table website. Alfred Perlstein
• 08:29   Solaris 2.6 problems Tatsuo Ishii
• 08:37   Re: Re: yowch: dumpRules(): SELECT failed for table website. Alfred Perlstein
• 09:00   Re: yowch: dumpRules(): SELECT failed for table website. Alfred Perlstein
• 09:18   UNDER syntax Chris Bitmead
• 09:30   Re: [BUGS] \dS and \df crashing psql Tatsuo Ishii
• 11:05   Re: setproctitle() The Hermit Hacker
• 11:46   Perl 5.6.0 Olivier PRENANT
• 12:20   Help with gram.y (UNDER) Chris Bitmead
• 12:36   Re: Help with gram.y (UNDER) Chris Bitmead
• 12:40   Re: Perl 5.6.0 teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 12:51   Re: Help with gram.y (UNDER) Chris Bitmead
• 13:27   Re: setproctitle() Bruce Momjian
• 13:27   AW: Postgresql OO Patch Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 13:43   AW: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 14:00   Re: setproctitle() The Hermit Hacker
• 14:00   Re: yowch: dumpRules(): SELECT failed for table website. Ross J. Reedstrom
• 14:08   Re: setproctitle() Bruce Momjian
• 14:11   AW: More Performance Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 14:12   AW: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySqlserver)) Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 14:14   Re: [GENERAL] Re: Postgresql OO Patch Hannu Krosing
• 14:19   Re: Perl 5.6.0 Tom Lane
• 14:21   AW: More Performance Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 14:24   Re: interactive pgsql book Bruce Momjian
• 14:31   Re: [GENERAL] Re: Postgresql OO Patch Hannu Krosing
• 14:45   Re: AW: More Performance Tom Lane
• 15:01   Re: Re: interactive pgsql book Vince Vielhaber
• 15:02   Re: Fwd: Re: SQL3 UNDER Hannu Krosing
• 15:23   Re: Re: interactive pgsql book Benjamin Adida
• 15:27   understanding Datum -> char * -> Datum conversions Louis-David Mitterrand
• 15:37   Re: Re: interactive pgsql book Poul L. Christiansen
• 15:49   Re: Re: interactive pgsql book Jeff Hoffmann
• 15:53   Re: Help with gram.y (UNDER) Tom Lane
• 15:55   Re: understanding Datum -> char * -> Datum conversions Karel Zak
• 16:25   Re: Re: interactive pgsql book Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
• 16:39   Re: Fwd: Re: SQL3 UNDER Robert B. Easter
• 16:55   Re: AW: Postgresql OO Patch Robert B. Easter
• 20:46   Re: Serious problem within authentication subsystem in 7.0 Peter Eisentraut
• 20:51   Re: setproctitle() Peter Eisentraut
• 20:53   Re: setproctitle() Peter Eisentraut
• 20:55   Re: understanding Datum -> char * -> Datum conversions Tom Lane
• 20:56   Re: Solaris 2.6 problems Peter Eisentraut
• 20:59   Re: setproctitle() Bruce Momjian
• 21:09   Re: Serious problem within authentication subsystem in 7.0 Tom Lane
• 21:25    gomathi raju
• 21:30   Re: understanding Datum -> char * -> Datum conversions Brook Milligan
• 22:01   Re: understanding Datum -> char * -> Datum conversions Tom Lane
• 22:50   Re: Fwd: Re: SQL3 UNDER Chris Bitmead
• 22:52   Re: AW: Postgresql OO Patch Chris Bitmead
• 23:06   [Fwd: 97BA-B931-B61D : CONSULT from pgsql-hackers-oo (post) (fwd)] Chris Bitmead

25 May 2000

• 00:10   Re: Fwd: Re: SQL3 UNDER Robert B. Easter
• 03:47   Good article on linux.com about PostgreSQL (sortof). Lamar Owen
• 04:15   Re: AW: Postgresql OO Patch Hannu Krosing
• 05:55   Re: Solaris 2.6 problems Tatsuo Ishii
• 07:05   AW: AW: More Performance Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:34   AW: More Performance Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 08:10   AW: Last call for comments: fmgr rewrite [LONG] Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 08:41   Re: understanding Datum -> char * -> Datum conversions Louis-David Mitterrand
• 08:46   AW: SQL3 UNDER Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 08:54   Re: understanding Datum -> char * -> Datum conversions Louis-David Mitterrand
• 09:14   AW: AW: Postgresql OO Patch Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 09:17   Re: AW: SQL3 UNDER Hannu Krosing
• 09:23   Re: understanding Datum -> char * -> Datum conversions Karel Zak
• 09:31   AW: AW: SQL3 UNDER Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 09:40   7.0.1? Michael Meskes
• 09:45   Re: understanding Datum -> char * -> Datum conversions Louis-David Mitterrand
• 10:00   AW: Berkeley DB... Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 10:08   Re: AW: AW: SQL3 UNDER Hannu Krosing
• 10:12   Re: understanding Datum -> char * -> Datum conversions Karel Zak
• 10:18   Re: AW: Berkeley DB... Hannu Krosing
• 10:26   Re: understanding Datum -> char * -> Datum conversions Louis-David Mitterrand
• 11:40   pfree() after palloc() in trigger (was: Re: understanding Datum -> char * -> Datum conversions) Louis-David Mitterrand
• 12:07   gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER Chris Bitmead
• 12:49   Re: Berkeley DB... Matthias Urlichs
• 12:50   Re: understanding Datum -> char * -> Datum conversions Bruce Momjian
• 13:37   RE: More Performance Mikheev, Vadim
• 13:48   Re: AW: Berkeley DB... Michael A. Olson
• 13:51   Re: AW: AW: More Performance Tom Lane
• 13:55   Re: understanding Datum -> char * -> Datum conversions Tom Lane
• 14:12   Re: pfree() after palloc() in trigger (was: Re: understanding Datum -> char * -> Datum conversions) Tom Lane
• 14:31   Timezone discrepancies Ed Loehr
• 14:36   parser oddity (t.count) Ed Loehr
• 14:43   AW: Berkeley DB... Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 14:47   vacuum analyze feedback Ed Loehr
• 14:47   Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER Tom Lane
• 14:49   AW: Berkeley DB... Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 14:52   AW: More Performance Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 14:57   AW: AW: Berkeley DB... Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 15:03   AW: AW: AW: SQL3 UNDER Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 15:15   RE: Berkeley DB... Mikheev, Vadim
• 15:17   Re: Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER Bruce Momjian
• 15:19   Re: vacuum analyze feedback Bruce Momjian
• 15:22   Create user/create database outside template1 Bruce Momjian
• 15:26   AW: AW: AW: More Performance Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 15:29   Re: parser oddity (t.count) Tom Lane
• 15:41   Re: Create user/create database outside template1 Tom Lane
• 15:43   Re: Create user/create database outside template1 Bruce Momjian
• 16:03   Re: Create user/create database outside template1 Vince Vielhaber
• 16:06   Re: Create user/create database outside template1 Tom Lane
• 16:07   Re: Create user/create database outside template1 Bruce Momjian
• 16:18   ... Mark R
• 16:20   RE: Berkeley DB... Mikheev, Vadim
• 16:43   Re: Ned Lilly
• 18:30   Re: vacuum analyze feedback Ed Loehr
• 18:56   Re: vacuum analyze feedback Bruce Momjian
• 19:41   Re: Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER Ross J. Reedstrom
• 19:51   Re: Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER Bruce Momjian
• 21:30   Any reason to use pg_dumpall on an idle database Bruce Momjian
• 21:42   Re: Any reason to use pg_dumpall on an idle database The Hermit Hacker
• 21:45   Re: Any reason to use pg_dumpall on an idle database Andrew McMillan
• 22:02   Re: Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER Ross J. Reedstrom
• 22:15   Re: Any reason to use pg_dumpall on an idle database Bruce Momjian
• 22:17   Re: Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER Bruce Momjian
• 22:47   Re: AW: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySqlserver)) Peter Eisentraut
• 22:53   Re: Any reason to use pg_dumpall on an idle database The Hermit Hacker
• 23:08   Re: Any reason to use pg_dumpall on an idle database Bruce Momjian
• 23:16   Re: Any reason to use pg_dumpall on an idle database The Hermit Hacker
• 23:24   Re: Any reason to use pg_dumpall on an idle database Bruce Momjian
• 23:36   Re: Any reason to use pg_dumpall on an idle database The Hermit Hacker
• 23:50   Re: Any reason to use pg_dumpall on an idle database Bruce Momjian

26 May 2000

• 00:20   Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER Chris Bitmead
• 00:20   [DONE] PostgreSQL-7.0 binary for WinNT Kevin Lo
• 00:35   Re: Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER Bruce Momjian
• 00:43   Re: [DONE] PostgreSQL-7.0 binary for WinNT Joe Shevland
• 00:56   Re: [DONE] PostgreSQL-7.0 binary for WinNT The Hermit Hacker
• 01:10   Re: Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER Tom Lane
• 01:12   Re: Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER Chris Bitmead
• 01:15   Re: Berkeley DB... Matthias Urlichs
• 01:17   Re: Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER Bruce Momjian
• 02:09   RE: Orphaned locks in 7.0? Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:17   smgrwrite() without LockBuffer(was RE: Shouldn't flush dirty buffers at shutdown ?) Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:31   Re: vacuum analyze feedback Philip Warner
• 02:33   Re: vacuum analyze feedback Bruce Momjian
• 02:40   Re: smgrwrite() without LockBuffer(was RE: Shouldn't flush dirty buffers at shutdown ?) Tom Lane
• 04:17   PostgreSQL 7.0-3 RPMset available. Lamar Owen
• 05:14   Re: Berkeley DB... Mike Mascari
• 05:46   RE: Create user/create database outside template1 Peter Mount
• 06:06   RE: smgrwrite() without LockBuffer(was RE: Shouldn't fl ush dirty buffers at shutdown ?) Mikheev, Vadim
• 07:12   RE: [INTERFACES] Postgresql 7.0 JDBC exceptions - broken connecti ons ? Peter Mount
• 11:03   Re: Berkeley DB... Hannu Krosing
• 11:19   Re: syslog fix Tatsuo Ishii
• 12:01   UNDER and INHERITS Robert B. Easter
• 13:32   Re: Any reason to use pg_dumpall on an idle database Bruce Momjian
• 14:13   Re: [INTERFACES] Postgresql 7.0 JDBC exceptions - broken connections ? Tom Lane
• 14:38   \h SELECT Bruce Momjian
• 14:41   Re: Berkeley DB... Tom Lane
• 14:43   Fixed psql \h SELECT Bruce Momjian
• 15:26   possible bug in RI? Karel Zak
• 15:26   Re: [SQL] aliases break my query Tom Lane
• 17:40   RE: Berkeley DB... Mikheev, Vadim
• 17:51   Re: Berkeley DB... Mike Mascari
• 19:05   New Type Olivier PRENANT
• 20:10   RE: Berkeley DB... Mikheev, Vadim
• 20:35   Re: Re: [SQL] aliases break my query Tom Lane
• 21:25   Re: Re: [SQL] aliases break my query Peter Eisentraut
• 21:42   Re: Re: [SQL] aliases break my query Tom Lane
• 22:41   where is libpq-fe.h Andy Joseph
• 22:49   Re: Berkeley DB... Bruce Momjian
• 22:50   Re: Re: [SQL] aliases break my query Bruce Momjian

27 May 2000

• 00:00   Re: where is libpq-fe.h Lamar Owen
• 00:49   Re: Re: [SQL] aliases break my query Mike Mascari
• 01:05   PostgreSQL v7.0 branched ... The Hermit Hacker
• 01:19   Re: [HACKERS-OO] UNDER and INHERITS Chris Bitmead
• 01:37   Back online Thomas Lockhart
• 02:10   Re: [GENERAL] SPI & file locations Lamar Owen
• 02:11   RE: Berkeley DB... Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:08   Re: Re: [SQL] aliases break my query Tom Lane
• 03:14   Rename pl/tcl to pl/pltcl Bruce Momjian
• 03:14   gram.y help, ONLY syntax Chris Bitmead
• 04:09   Re: Rename pl/tcl to pl/pltcl Alfred Perlstein
• 04:50   Re: [GENERAL] SPI & file locations Tom Lane
• 05:06   Re: Rename pl/tcl to pl/pltcl Tom Lane
• 13:31   Re: Back online Tatsuo Ishii
• 15:21   Re: [DONE] PostgreSQL-7.0 binary for WinNT Kevin Lo
• 18:50   Re: [DONE] PostgreSQL-7.0 binary for WinNT The Hermit Hacker
• 19:56   Re: [GENERAL] SPI & file locations Lamar Owen
• 21:24   but i _really can't_ insert a duplicate key! Alfred Perlstein

28 May 2000

• 03:51   RE: Berkeley DB... Mikheev, Vadim
• 03:55   Regression test failure on 7.0-STABLE Tatsuo Ishii
• 04:29   Re: Berkeley DB... Tom Lane
• 04:31   Re: Regression test failure on 7.0-STABLE Tatsuo Ishii
• 04:37   Re: Regression test failure on 7.0-STABLE Tom Lane
• 06:29   Re: Re: [SQL] aliases break my query Zeugswetter Andreas
• 06:29   Re: Berkeley DB... Zeugswetter Andreas
• 06:29   Re: Any reason to use pg_dumpall on an idle database Zeugswetter Andreas
• 16:03   Re: Perl 5.6.0 Olivier PRENANT
• 17:26   Proposed cleanup of generated header files Tom Lane
• 17:45   Re: Proposed cleanup of generated header files Bruce Momjian
• 18:01   Re: Proposed cleanup of generated header files The Hermit Hacker
• 18:51   Spliting vacuum and analyze Bruce Momjian
• 21:13   Re: Berkeley DB... Peter Eisentraut

29 May 2000

• 01:16   Re: Berkeley DB... Tom Lane
• 01:31   Re: parser oddity (t.count) Andreas Zeugswetter
• 01:37   Re: Berkeley DB... Matthias Urlichs
• 01:38   Re: AW: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySqlserver)) Andreas Zeugswetter
• 01:38   Re: Any reason to use pg_dumpall on an idle database Andreas Zeugswetter
• 01:48   Re: [INTERFACES] Postgresql 7.0 JDBC exceptions - broken connecti ons ? Gunnar R|nning
• 01:55   Increasing row size beyond 8k Mitch Vincent
• 02:02   Re: [SQL] aliases break my query Peter Eisentraut
• 02:03   Probably already asked but CB
• 02:04   Re: [INTERFACES] Postgresql 7.0 JDBC exceptions - broken connections ? Gunnar R|nning
• 02:20   Re: Re: [SQL] aliases break my query Andreas Zeugswetter
• 02:21   Re: Proposal for enhancements of privilege system Andreas Zeugswetter
• 02:22   RE: Berkeley DB... Andreas Zeugswetter
• 02:23   Full text indexing preformance! (long) Mitch Vincent
• 02:31   Re: Probably already asked but The Hermit Hacker
• 02:55   Re: Increasing row size beyond 8k Tom Lane
• 03:13   Re: Probably already asked but Tom Lane
• 03:15   Re: but i _really can't_ insert a duplicate key! Alfred Perlstein
• 03:48   RE: Berkeley DB... Hiroshi Inoue
• 04:54   Re: Proposed cleanup of generated header files Tom Lane
• 05:57   Re: Full text indexing preformance! (long) Tom Lane
• 09:56   pg_* files are too large for empty database. Denis Perchine
• 11:28   Timestamp data type problems Olivier PRENANT
• 13:33   Re: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server) Jeff MacDonald
• 14:04   CVS FAQ on web page Bruce Momjian
• 14:19   Re: Berkeley DB... Karel Zak
• 14:58   Vacuum now uses AccessShareLock for analyze Bruce Momjian
• 15:11   Additional system indexes Bruce Momjian
• 15:14   Re: Vacuum now uses AccessShareLock for analyze The Hermit Hacker
• 15:16   Re: Vacuum now uses AccessShareLock for analyze Bruce Momjian
• 15:42   Re: Vacuum now uses AccessShareLock for analyze The Hermit Hacker
• 15:50   Re: Additional system indexes Tom Lane
• 15:56   Re: Vacuum now uses AccessShareLock for analyze Bruce Momjian
• 16:06   Re: Proposal for enhancements of privilege system Peter Eisentraut
• 16:06   Configuration and build clean-up Peter Eisentraut
• 16:07   Re: Vacuum now uses AccessShareLock for analyze Tom Lane
• 16:10   Re: Vacuum now uses AccessShareLock for analyze Bruce Momjian
• 16:24   Re: pg_* files are too large for empty database. Tom Lane
• 16:42   Re: Vacuum now uses AccessShareLock for analyze Daniel Kalchev
• 16:54   Re: Re: Additional system indexes Bruce Momjian
• 16:57   Re: Vacuum now uses AccessShareLock for analyze Bruce Momjian
• 17:11   Re: Configuration and build clean-up Tom Lane
• 17:20   Re: Vacuum now uses AccessShareLock for analyze Tom Lane
• 17:59   Re: Configuration and build clean-up teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 18:21   Re: Timestamp data type problems Tom Lane
• 19:05   Re: Full text indexing preformance! (long) Mitch Vincent
• 19:37   Header File cleanup. Lamar Owen
• 19:45   Re: Timestamp data type problems Olivier PRENANT
• 20:15   Re: Timestamp data type problems Tom Lane
• 21:02   Re: Header File cleanup. The Hermit Hacker
• 21:15   RE: Berkeley DB... Mikheev, Vadim
• 23:41   Re: Header File cleanup. Lamar Owen

30 May 2000

• 00:06   #include cleanup Bruce Momjian
• 00:06   #include cleanup Bruce Momjian
• 00:12   RE: Re: Additional system indexes Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:48   cvs help with logs Bruce Momjian
• 01:04   Re: cvs help with logs The Hermit Hacker
• 01:14   Re: cvs help with logs] Bruce Momjian
• 01:34   Re: ODBC patch Kovacs Zoltan
• 01:38   Applying TOAST to CURRENT JanWieck@t-online.de (Jan Wieck)
• 01:44   Re: #include cleanup Lamar Owen
• 01:53   Cursors Antony Sakellariou
• 01:57   Re: #include cleanup Bruce Momjian
• 01:57   Re: Applying TOAST to CURRENT Bruce Momjian
• 04:55   Re: Full text indexing preformance! (long) Tom Lane
• 05:06   Re: Header File cleanup. Tom Lane
• 05:47   RE: [INTERFACES] Postgresql 7.0 JDBC exceptions - broken connecti ons ? Peter Mount
• 09:45   Re: Applying TOAST to CURRENT JanWieck@t-online.de (Jan Wieck)
• 10:34   Rename database? Philip Warner
• 10:39   AW: Proposal for enhancements of privilege system Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 10:43   Re: Re: [GENERAL] SPI & file locations Peter Vazsonyi
• 11:07   Re: AW: Proposal for enhancements of privilege system Karel Zak
• 11:28   7.0 weirdness Jeff MacDonald
• 12:39   AW: AW: Proposal for enhancements of privilege system Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 12:45   AW: AW: Proposal for enhancements of privilege system Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 13:10   Re: [SQL] 7.0 weirdness Jeff MacDonald
• 13:23   Re: Configuration and build clean-up Tom Lane
• 13:28   Re: AW: AW: Proposal for enhancements of privilege system Karel Zak
• 13:32   Re: Re: [SQL] 7.0 weirdness Matthias Urlichs
• 13:45   Re: [SQL] 7.0 weirdness Tom Lane
• 13:58   Re: Applying TOAST to CURRENT Tom Lane
• 14:01   Re: Applying TOAST to CURRENT Bruce Momjian
• 14:08   Re: Applying TOAST to CURRENT Tom Lane
• 14:28   Re: Rename database? Tom Lane
• 15:13   Re: Applying TOAST to CURRENT The Hermit Hacker
• 15:24   Re: Applying TOAST to CURRENT Bruce Momjian
• 15:33   CVS log of only one branch Bruce Momjian
• 17:14   CVS log problem Bruce Momjian
• 17:21   Mention WAL in the book Bruce Momjian
• 18:33   RE: New Type Krotenko Valery V.
• 18:43   secondary password files Bruce Momjian
• 19:08   Re: Applying TOAST to CURRENT Hannu Krosing
• 19:13   config files in /data Bruce Momjian
• 19:25   Does pg_passwd files work with crypt Bruce Momjian
• 20:15   Re: Applying TOAST to CURRENT The Hermit Hacker
• 20:25   Re: config files in /data The Hermit Hacker
• 20:26   Re: Applying TOAST to CURRENT Hannu Krosing
• 20:31   Re: config files in /data Bruce Momjian
• 20:41   Re: secondary password files Tom Lane
• 20:42   Re: config files in /data Tom Lane
• 20:47   Re: secondary password files Bruce Momjian
• 21:05   Re: secondary password files Tom Lane
• 21:06   Re: config files in /data Tom Lane
• 23:07   Re: secondary password files Bruce Momjian
• 23:09   Re: config files in /data Bruce Momjian
• 23:54   Re: Perl 5.6.0 Matthias Urlichs

31 May 2000

• 00:00   Re: Configuration and build clean-up Peter Eisentraut
• 00:01   Re: AW: Proposal for enhancements of privilege system Peter Eisentraut
• 00:03   New configuration is here Peter Eisentraut
• 00:06   Using BOOL in indexes Andrew McMillan
• 00:07   Re: [SQL] 7.0 weirdness omid omoomi
• 00:09   Re: config files in /data Peter Eisentraut
• 00:09   SET FSYNC command? Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:10   Re: CVS log problem Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:34   Re: SET FSYNC command? Bruce Momjian
• 00:36   Re: CVS log problem The Hermit Hacker
• 00:48   Re: Full text indexing preformance! (long) Mitch Vincent
• 00:48   RE: Using BOOL in indexes Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:04   Re: Re: [SQL] aliases break my query Thomas Lockhart
• 01:45   Re: Applying TOAST to CURRENT JanWieck@t-online.de (Jan Wieck)
• 02:00   RE: Using BOOL in indexes Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:53   Re: Applying TOAST to CURRENT Tom Lane
• 03:01   Re: Using BOOL in indexes Andrew McMillan
• 03:16   RE: Using BOOL in indexes Hiroshi Inoue
• 04:11   Re: SET FSYNC command? Grant Finnemore
• 05:15   Re: SET FSYNC command? Tom Lane
• 05:22   Re: SET FSYNC command? Tom Lane
• 06:12   Re: Applying TOAST to CURRENT Hannu Krosing
• 06:31   AW: Applying TOAST to CURRENT Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 06:43   Re: [SQL] 7.0 weirdness Peter Vazsonyi
• 09:44   Re: SET FSYNC command? Peter Eisentraut
• 12:49   Re: SET FSYNC command? Thomas Lockhart
• 14:43   Re: OO / fe-be protocol Thomas Lockhart
• 14:49   Re: Back online Thomas Lockhart
• 15:28   Re: ODBC patch Thomas Lockhart
• 15:46   Re: Applying TOAST to CURRENT JanWieck@t-online.de (Jan Wieck)
• 16:20   Re: config files in /data Tom Lane
• 16:24   Re: config files in /data Bruce Momjian
• 16:26   Re: config files in /data Tom Lane
• 17:01   Re: config files in /data Bruce Momjian
• 17:42   Re: SET FSYNC command? Peter Eisentraut
• 18:03   Re: Re: [SQL] 7.0 weirdness Jeff MacDonald
• 18:30   Re: config files in /data Peter Eisentraut
• 18:45   Re: config files in /data Bruce Momjian
• 18:49   bug or feature? (regarding rules) Jeff Hoffmann
• 19:47   more cvs problems Bruce Momjian
• 20:09   Re: Database names with spaces Bruce Momjian
• 20:20   Re: Failures with arrays Bruce Momjian
• 22:10   Re: Database names with spaces Tom Lane
• 22:16   Re: config files in /data Tom Lane
• 22:23   Re: config files in /data Bruce Momjian
• 22:30   Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct Bruce Momjian
• 22:47   pg_am.amowner Peter Eisentraut
• 23:02   Re: pg_am.amowner Bruce Momjian
• 23:05   Re: PgAccess - small bug? Bruce Momjian