Re: Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER
Date
Msg-id 200005251612.MAA25387@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER  ("Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
> If you don't get rid of those then your parser will behave in surprising
> ways.  So far you have noticed the fallout from only one of those
> conflicts, but every one of them is a potential bug.  Be advised that
> gram.y patches that create unresolved conflicts will *not* be accepted.

Yes, even I don't apply those, though they say I never met a patch I
didn't like.  :-)

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Mikheev, Vadim"
Date:
Subject: RE: Berkeley DB...
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuum analyze feedback