Re: Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ross J. Reedstrom
Subject Re: Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER
Date
Msg-id 20000525153923.C24674@rice.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 12:12:12PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > If you don't get rid of those then your parser will behave in surprising
> > ways.  So far you have noticed the fallout from only one of those
> > conflicts, but every one of them is a potential bug.  Be advised that
> > gram.y patches that create unresolved conflicts will *not* be accepted.
> 
> Yes, even I don't apply those, though they say I never met a patch I
> didn't like.  :-)

Bruce, your going to _make_ me grovel through the archives, and prove
that you were the first one to say that aren't you?

Ross
;-)


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuum analyze feedback
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER