Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.21.0005050239350.56194-100000@thelab.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?  (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
Responses Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 5 May 2000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:

> > Hiroshi did commit a change to doc/src/sgml/ref/postgres-ref.sgml for
> > that just a few days ago, but I guess it didn't make it into the derived
> > files that Thomas was preparing off-line.  I believe there were several
> > other small doco fixes while Thomas was on vacation --- I dunno if he
> > plans to try to get those into the 7.0 derived docs or not.
> 
> I'll move a new copy of the html into users-lounge before release, and
> will try poking at the hardcopy versions too (but I consider the
> hardcopy fixes noncritical since we are so far past the "freeze"
> point).
> 
> Depends on the actual release schedule as to whether they will get in
> to the hardcopy; the pg_group stuff doesn't open a large can of worms,
> but we might want a few days for it to settle out??

I have no probs with extending the release a couple of days ... Wednesday
sound good for everyone, as things stand now?

Marc G. Fournier                   ICQ#7615664               IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: [CRITICAL PATCH] Release Candidate 5 ...
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: 7.0RC2 compile error !