Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
Date
Msg-id 200005050451.AAA11288@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
> > Why does pg_group exist under $PGDATA though the indexes exist
> > under each $PGDATA/base/db_name ?
> > Could it be consistent on all databases ?
> 
> Oh my, I think you've got it!  The indexes must be SharedSystemRelations!!
> 
...
> 
> pg_shadow would have the same problem if it had indices, which I thought
> it did but they seem to have been disabled.
> 
> Can you say "one more initdb"?  I knew you could...

You know, I am reading through this message, and thinking, gee, how is
he going to get out of this without initdb?  Well I have my answer.



--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?