Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
Date
Msg-id 200005052247.SAA07302@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
List pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> >> How about calling pg_ctl from pg_upgrade to stop the postmaster ?
> 
> > Great idea.  We never had an automated way to do that before.
> 
> I'd just as soon *not* have pg_upgrade assuming that it knows how
> I like my postmaster started.  If pg_ctl will work to stop a postmaster
> whether or not it was started with pg_ctl, then it'd probably be a good
> idea to use pg_ctl to ensure that there is no postmaster running in the
> target database.  I'd suggest not trying to restart the postmaster
> automatically afterwards, though.  Too much site dependency in that.

But doesn't it find the params from the last startup?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Porting reports (cont'd)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?