Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
Date
Msg-id 200005051408.KAA29494@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?  (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > Hiroshi did commit a change to doc/src/sgml/ref/postgres-ref.sgml for
> > that just a few days ago, but I guess it didn't make it into the derived
> > files that Thomas was preparing off-line.  I believe there were several
> > other small doco fixes while Thomas was on vacation --- I dunno if he
> > plans to try to get those into the 7.0 derived docs or not.
> 
> I'll move a new copy of the html into users-lounge before release, and
> will try poking at the hardcopy versions too (but I consider the
> hardcopy fixes noncritical since we are so far past the "freeze"
> point).

Thomas, do you want PDF's rather than postscript files?  Let me know.  I
can easily download them and generate PDF's.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: RE: suggestion: docs and psql
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?