Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
Date
Msg-id 200005050515.BAA12443@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> That's a fair objection for the LIKE estimator, which after all hasn't
> gotten much testing.  I'll leave well enough alone there.  But those
> missing ODBC functions are just another dozen SQL-function entries for
> pg_proc; hard to see how they can break anything else, even if (worst
> case) they're wrong themselves ...

Agreed on the ODBC.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?