Re: pg_am.amowner - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_am.amowner
Date
Msg-id 200006010001.UAA05435@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_am.amowner  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> It seems that access methods nominally have an "owner", but that owner is
> nowhere else referenced. Since there is no user interface for adding
> access methods anyway, would there be any problems with removing that
> field?

I can't think of a reason not to remove it.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: pg_am.amowner
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PgAccess - small bug?