pg_am.amowner - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject pg_am.amowner
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0006010142210.701-100000@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: pg_am.amowner  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: pg_am.amowner  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
It seems that access methods nominally have an "owner", but that owner is
nowhere else referenced. Since there is no user interface for adding
access methods anyway, would there be any problems with removing that
field?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_am.amowner