Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>> The advantage is that you can then index a bunch more of the system
>> catalog tables, and on a bunch more attributes. That produced some
>> surprising speedups.
> We have indexes on all system tables that need it.
There isn't any fundamental reason why the planner can't be using an
index to scan pg_index; we just need to code it that way. Right now
it's coded as a sequential scan.
Unfortunately there is no index on pg_index's indrelid column in 7.0,
so this is not fixable without an initdb. TODO item for 7.1, I guess.
More generally, someone should examine the other places where
heap_getnext() loops occur, and see if any of them look like performance
bottlenecks...
regards, tom lane
