Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
Date
Msg-id 39126874.874EA783@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: pg_group_name_index corrupt?  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
> OK, I thought you might want to argue more strongly for adding the
> ODBC stuff while we had the chance ... but if you are happy with the
> status quo then I'm happy.

No, I've already been embarrassed once recently; don't want to touch
anything in the last few days. Especially since I've been *so* busy at
work and with the docs that it will be hard to give it enough
attention (even though in principle it is pretty trivial).
                      - Tom

-- 
Thomas Lockhart                lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?