Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
Date
Msg-id 5490.957507155@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?  (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
> btw, I'm all for fixing pg_group (it is really nonoptional imho) and
> the ODBC stuff is noncritical since loading the contrib/odbc/odbc.sql
> is sufficient to get the functions or operators defined since the
> support code is already in the backend.

OK, I thought you might want to argue more strongly for adding the
ODBC stuff while we had the chance ... but if you are happy with the
status quo then I'm happy.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 7.0RC2 compile error !
Next
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?