RE: lo_unlink - Mailing list pgsql-interfaces

From Peter Mount
Subject RE: lo_unlink
Date
Msg-id 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478C70C5D2@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-interfaces
I think we should...

-- 
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support
Maidstone Borough Council
Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.



-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us]
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2000 1:29 PM
To: PostgreSQL-development
Cc: PostgreSQL-interfaces
Subject: [INTERFACES] lo_unlink


In looking through the documention programmers guide, I don't see any
mention of lo_unlink().  Isn't that the only way to remove large objects
from the database?  Shouldn't we mention that?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania
19026


pgsql-interfaces by date:

Previous
From: Anders Bengtsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Missing features in JDBC driver
Next
From: Nicolas Huillard
Date:
Subject: [ADMIN] URGENT : ODBC client for Mac ?