Re: psql \l error - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tatsuo Ishii
Subject Re: psql \l error
Date
Msg-id 20000502165335D.t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: psql \l error  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> This is evidently happening because psql's initial inquiry about the
> database encoding fails.
> 
> Seems like it might be a good idea if the non-MULTIBYTE stub versions of
> pg_encoding_to_char() and friends were to return default values (eg,
> "SQL_ASCII") instead of erroring out.  A MULTIBYTE version of psql
> really ought to be able to work with a non-MULTIBYTE server.
> 
> >   postgres=# \l
> >   ERROR:  No such function 'pg_encoding_to_char' with the 
> >           specified attributes
> 
> Hmm.  This is happening because 7.0 psql tries to display the encoding
> of each database if psql was compiled with MULTIBYTE.
> 
> Here you are evidently talking to a pre-7.0 server (both because
> a 7.0 server should have that function, even if the function
> refuses to work ;-)) and because a 7.0 server does not spell the
> 'No such function' error message quite that way.
> 
> This one is a little nastier.  The only solution I could see that would
> guarantee backwards compatibility is for psql not to try to display the
> database encoding; that doesn't seem like a win.  I think there are
> some other small incompatibilities between 7.0 psql and pre-7.0 servers
> anyway, so eliminating this one by dumbing down \l is probably not
> the way to proceed.
> 
> So, I'd suggest fixing the first issue (so that 7.0 MULTIBYTE psql works
> with non-MULTIBYTE 7.0 server) but not trying to do anything about
> MULTIBYTE psql with a pre-7.0 server.  Comments?

Sounds reasonable. I will fix the former but will leave the later as
it is.
--
Tatsuo Ishii


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: SAKAIDA
Date:
Subject: Re: psql \l error
Next
From: Peter Mount
Date:
Subject: RE: Request for 7.0 JDBC status