Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

2 May 2000

• 00:02   [Fwd: PG 7.0 is great!] Lamar Owen
• 00:02   RE: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:36   RE: When malloc returns zero ... Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:57   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Thomas Lockhart
• 01:32   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Lamar Owen
• 01:36   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian
• 01:48   psql \l error SAKAIDA
• 02:25   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Thomas Lockhart
• 03:35   Re: psql \l error Tom Lane
• 03:37   ... Billy G. Allie
• 03:44   Update to FAQ_SCO. Billy G. Allie
• 04:14   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Thomas Lockhart
• 04:21   Re: Case insensitive collation. Malcontent
• 04:44   RE: psql \l error Hiroshi Inoue
• 05:53   Re: psql \l error SAKAIDA
• 06:53   Re: psql \l error Tatsuo Ishii
• 06:55   RE: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount
• 07:03   RE: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount
• 07:22   RE: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount
• 07:33   Re: psql \l error Peter Eisentraut
• 07:40   RE: psql \l error Peter Eisentraut
• 07:46   RE: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount
• 08:15   Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea Peter Eisentraut
• 08:26   Re: psql \l error SAKAIDA
• 08:29   Re: When malloc returns zero ... Peter Eisentraut
• 09:21   Re: psql \l error Hiroshi Inoue
• 09:54   Re: [PORTS] Update to FAQ_SCO. Bruce Momjian
• 10:01   Re: psql \l error Bruce Momjian
• 10:02   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian
• 10:07   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian
• 10:08   Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea Thomas Lockhart
• 10:38   Re: PgAccess 0.98.6 , a ugly bug fixed Bruce Momjian
• 10:41   RE: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount
• 10:44   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Thomas Lockhart
• 10:46   RE: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount
• 10:52   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian
• 11:03   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian
• 11:07   RE: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount
• 11:09   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Thomas Lockhart
• 11:13   Re: psql \l error Bruce Momjian
• 11:40   RE: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount
• 11:46   RE: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount
• 12:09   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian
• 12:17   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian
• 12:23   insert new type (object ?) Loïc TREGOUËT
• 12:27   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian
• 12:47   Re: When malloc returns zero ... Mark Hollomon
• 12:49   Re: Patch submission Thomas Lockhart
• 12:53   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Thomas Lockhart
• 12:59   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian
• 13:11   Re: psql \l error SAKAIDA Masaaki
• 13:16   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Thomas Lockhart
• 13:22   Re: Proposal for fixing intra-query memory leaks Karel Zak
• 13:27   RE: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Peter Mount
• 13:45   Re: insert new type (object ?) JanWieck@t-online.de (Jan Wieck)
• 13:59   Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea Tom Lane
• 14:21   Re: When malloc returns zero ... Tom Lane
• 14:31   Re: Patch submission Adam Haberlach
• 14:40   Re: psql \l error Tom Lane
• 14:52   Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea Tom Lane
• 14:54   Hardcopy docs about ready Thomas Lockhart
• 15:09   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Tom Lane
• 15:26   Re: Proposal for fixing intra-query memory leaks Tom Lane
• 15:41   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Don Baccus
• 15:56   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian
• 16:10   Re: [Acs-pg-dev] another milestone! Don Baccus
• 16:23   Why Not MySQL? Don Baccus
• 16:28   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Tom Lane
• 16:40   Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status Bruce Momjian
• 16:49   Re: Proposal for fixing intra-query memory leaks Karel Zak
• 20:31   Re: Proposal for fixing intra-query memory leaks Peter Eisentraut
• 20:38   Re: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Peter Eisentraut
• 20:39   Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea Peter Eisentraut
• 20:40   Re: Proposal for fixing intra-query memory leaks Tom Lane
• 20:43   Re: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch Bruce Momjian
• 20:51   Re: Proposal for fixing intra-query memory leaks Karel Zak
• 20:51   Re: Proposal for fixing intra-query memory leaks Tom Lane
• 20:59   Re: Why Not MySQL? Bruce Momjian
• 21:03   Re: Proposal for fixing intra-query memory leaks Tom Lane
• 21:25   Re: Why Not MySQL? Mitch Vincent
• 22:02   Re: Why Not MySQL? Tim Uckun
• 22:08   Re: Why Not MySQL? Don Baccus
• 23:14   RE: When malloc returns zero ... Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:55   7.0RC2 compile error ! frank