Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status
Date
Msg-id 390ED14D.2BB81FD8@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status
List pgsql-hackers
> > Thinking about it, what's the date on the Makefile? I wasn't sure if the
> > Makefile committed last time (I accidentally overwote the one in
> > src/interfaces).
> Jan put the old one back, and I got your out of CVS and moved it to
> jdbc.  It should be the one you committed.

Just guessing: it is reverted to a slightly older version. As I
showed, it has no rule for making jar files, though it *does* make a
jar file automagically :(
                   - Thomas

-- 
Thomas Lockhart                lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch submission
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status