Re: psql \l error - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: psql \l error
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0005030025570.362-100000@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: psql \l error  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: psql \l error
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> Looking at less generic answers, I suppose that psql could try to use
> a 7.0-compatible query and fall back to a 6.5-compatible query if that
> fails.  I imagine Peter will class this answer as "too ugly to live" ;-).

Until there is at least a glimpse of error codes I'd say it's "too
incorrect to live" ...


-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea
Next
From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB
Date:
Subject: AW: Why Not MySQL?