AW: Why Not MySQL? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Zeugswetter Andreas SB
Subject AW: Why Not MySQL?
Date
Msg-id 219F68D65015D011A8E000006F8590C604AF7D6A@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-hackers
> "In a nutshell I want to use postgres as a back end to an access
> database. This means that all collation done by postgres musht be case
> insensitive including like clauses."
> 
> I left the all the spelling mistakes in place :)

Could a national char implementation that is case insensitive be a solution
here ?
Meaning: is it as simple as setting LC_COLLATE to another value and
configuring
--enable-locale ?
How far is Thomas with the nchar nvarchar types ?
I think national char and national char varying are the correct datatypes
for 
such behavior. Although I think the = operator is still case sensitive for
that datatype.
Replacing = or like for the char and varchar or text datatypes is probably
not possible, 
because it is used internally, but for nchar ... it should be.

Andreas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: psql \l error
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: \h behaviour - strange ?