Re: Why Not MySQL? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: Why Not MySQL?
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.21.0005030925180.92638-100000@thelab.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why Not MySQL?  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 3 May 2000, Hannu Krosing wrote:

> Malcontent null wrote:
> > 
> > >Anyway, so the larger class of problem is for the Sybase/M$ user who
> > >relies on case insensitive queries (which *are* available in Postgres)
> 
> Maybe the right place to introduce case-insensitiveness would be in ODBC 
> driver then ?
> 
> > If I may.
> > MS Access for all of it's damnable faults is the single most popular
> > database in the world. There are a whole slew of people who do nothing
> > except access programming and make very good money at it. Postgres is
> > a great candidate as a possible  back end database engine for access.
> > This is a big possible application for postgres. To be usable for this
> > purpose however it needs a few things.
> > 1) Longer object names (I guess this is possible via a DEFINE)
> 
> How long should they be ?
> 
> > 2) Case insensitive queries.
> 
> Probably only the Access subset ("like", "order by", maybe even "=" ?)

don't we have a 'lower()' function?

SELECT * FROM <table> WHERE field ~* 'this string' ORDER BY lower(field);?

or

SELECT * FROM <table> WHERE lower(field) = lower('StriNg');





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: SAKAIDA Masaaki
Date:
Subject: Re: psql \l error
Next
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: Corruption (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL?)