Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hannu Krosing
Subject Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO)
Date
Msg-id 3928F01B.B0C6D563@tm.ee
Whole thread Raw
In response to Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO)  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Chris Bitmead wrote:
> 
> Hannu Krosing wrote:
> 
> > Chris, what is your position on having a single primary key for all
> > inherited columns ?
> 
> What is the significance of a primary key compared to any old unique
> key?

I don't know ;) Some theorists seem to think it important, and PG allows 
only one PK per table.

I just meant that primary key (as well as any other uniqe key) should be 
inherited from parent table

------------------
Hannu


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: Last call for comments: fmgr rewrite [LONG]
Next
From: Chris Bitmead
Date:
Subject: Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO)