Re: Problems with the new Majordomo 2. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: Problems with the new Majordomo 2.
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.21.0005161306260.208-100000@thelab.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Problems with the new Majordomo 2.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 16 May 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> > PRS ... PostReleaseSyndrome ... ppl are rebuilding up their energy,
> > watching for bugs while waiting for development to start up again.
> 
> If he's only getting one or two messages a day, then something's surely
> broken!  According to my maillog there were 92 messages on the pghackers
> list yesterday, and another 20+ on interfaces.
> 
> However, I'm inclined to think that the breakage is on his end, since
> no one else is complaining ...

Regardless of which end is at fault, I am looking at this from our end
anyway ... I'm wondering if maybe there was a connection problem to his
system and the mail system itself just bounced it ...

> BTW, did I mention that I confirmed majordomo had lost my subscription
> to pgsql-patches?  I did a who on the list and found no entry.  
> Curious. Doesn't seem to have happened on any other list, but it
> explains why I've seen no patches for a good while.

I'm embarressed to say that the Mj2 guys took a look at our system logs
and, ummmm, it doesn't look like some ppl were subscribed to the
pgsql-patches list when we first moved it over :(  Looks like definitely
operator error on this one *sigh*




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: Berkeley DB license
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Berkeley DB license