Re: Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ross J. Reedstrom
Subject Re: Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER
Date
Msg-id 20000525180200.A28194@rice.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 04:49:21PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > 
> > > Yes, even I don't apply those, though they say I never met a patch I
> > > didn't like.  :-)
> > 
> > Bruce, your going to _make_ me grovel through the archives, and prove
> > that you were the first one to say that aren't you?
> 
> I believe it was a Thomas Lockhart line.

O.K., first one _I_ saw say that. 

Ross
P.S. you do all us occasional patchers a great service. Don't change a
thing ;-)


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew McMillan
Date:
Subject: Re: Any reason to use pg_dumpall on an idle database
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Any reason to use pg_dumpall on an idle database