Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
Date
Msg-id 200005050516.BAA12456@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> >> Would a pg_upgrade fix this, or do I have to do a whole dump/reload?  
> 
> > pg_upgrade *should* work, but if I were you I'd make a backup dump
> > first, just in case.  I don't trust pg_upgrade very much...
> 
> Oh, btw: pg_upgrade will *not* work to save and reload your group
> definitions, because neither it nor pg_dumpall do anything at all with
> pg_group!  For that matter, a full dumpall/reload won't preserve
> groups either!
> 
> I griped about that a week or so ago, but no one seems to have picked up
> on it.  Do you want to consider that a "must fix" problem as well?
> I think it's a pretty minor fix, but considering how late we are in the
> cycle...

Please give me something to add to the TODO.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?