On Thu, 11 May 2000, Tim Perdue wrote:
> This seems like a hack to me personally. Can someone figure out why the
> vacuum runs forever and fix it? Probably a logic flaw somewhere?
I run on a >9million tuple database, and growing, in <10 minutes or so
... its the search engine for the archives, and I'm finding that if I do a
'vacuum verbose', I'm getting alot of deletes (updated records) ...
not quite the same number that you are reporting, mind you, but ...
what does a 'vacuum verbose' show for you? and youa ren't doing a 'vacuum
analyze', are you?
