> Hmm. In 7.0, COPY IN acquires an exclusive lock on the target table,
> which is something I put in in a fit of paranoia. It may not really
> be necessary --- probably a regular write lock would be good enough.
> (6.5's COPY code neglected to acquire any lock at all, which is surely
> *not* good enough, but maybe I overreacted.)
Oh, seems I forgot about COPY in 6.5... -:(
ROW EXCLUSIVE lock is required (just like for INSERT, DELETE, UPDATE)...
Vadim
