> > Also, MD5 is not ideal for passwords. Seems the standard unix-style
> > password crypting is the standard, so it should be used to crypt our own
> > passwords in pg_shadow. I am sure someone would find some problem with
> > us using md5 for password storage.
>
> FreeBSD uses MD5 by default since at least ver 2.2, possibly earlier.
>
> > We already use the unix-style password crypt to send passwords over the
> > wire. Why not use it for storage too?
>
> Can ALL clients we support use it over the wire?
Yes, I think so. Java has its own, and the others use libpq do to it.
The beauty of my suggesting is that all we have to do is pass the
pg_shadow salt along with the random salt, and call the crypt code
twice, first with the pg_shadow salt, then with the random salt.
The server pass the pg_shadow version through the random salt crypt, and
compares.
Now, I we want to move all the stuff to use MD5 rather than the standard
unix password crypt, that is another option, though I am not sure what
value it would have.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
