Re: Cosmetic bug in 7.0 docs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: Cosmetic bug in 7.0 docs
Date
Msg-id 390D68E0.316741AF@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-hackers
>  I today a save time for reading in current docs  (it is under next URL?)
>         http://www.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/index.html
>  and I found some cosmetic bugs:
>  - the copyright is 1996-9, but not 2000 (is it right?)

Fixed that in my sources while generating hardcopy; will commit today.

>  - the pg_dump support long argv switches (like the other routines), but
>         in docs it is not.

Sorry, where exactly is that in the docs? I haven't looked yet, but
will poke at pg_dump.sgml...
                   - Thomas

-- 
Thomas Lockhart                lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: gmake[3]: *** No rule to make target page/SUBSYS.o ?????????????????
Next
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: CREATE TABLE AS standard?