Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? ) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? )
Date
Msg-id 23832.957452780@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? )  (Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>)
Responses Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? )  ("Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@wallace.ece.rice.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com> writes:
> So, what's the bottom line?  The numbers don't tell us much,
> though I still think Tom's right that the PG7.0 one is really
> slower.  You just can't say if how MUCH slower.

Actually I was a lot more concerned about disk performance than CPU
speed.  I notice no one's said anything about the relative speed
of Mitch's two different disk setups ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
Next
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?