On Tue, 16 May 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 May 2000, Michael A. Olson wrote:
> >
> > > Rather than replacing just the storage manager, you'd be replacing
> > > the access methods, buffer manager, transaction manager, and some
> > > of the shared memory plumbing with our stuff.
> >
> > So, basically, we rip out 3+ years or work on our backend and put an SQL
> > front-end over top of BerkleyDB?
>
> Now, no one is suggesting we do this. The issue is exploring what gains
> we could make in doing this.
Definitely ... I'm just reducing it down to simpler terms, that's all :)
