Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 January 2002

• 01:08   Re: Latest datetime changes produce gcc complaints Thomas Lockhart
• 12:08   Happy new year Jean-Michel POURE
• 18:10   Duplicate-key-detection failure case found in btree Tom Lane
• 19:13   Re: Duplicate-key-detection failure case found in btree Bruce Momjian
• 21:14   Re: [PATCHES] system catalog relation of a table and a serial sequence Brent Verner
• 22:44   problems with new vacuum (??) Barry Lind
• 23:08   Re: problems with new vacuum (??) Tom Lane

2 January 2002

• 01:39   Re: [SQL] An easy question about creating a primary key Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 03:44   Re: problems with new vacuum (??) Barry Lind
• 06:44   Re: problems with new vacuum (??) Andrew McMillan
• 07:39   Feature proposal: generalizing deferred trigger events Holger Krug
• 09:11   Re: problems with new vacuum (??) Hannu Krosing
• 09:11   datetime error? Karel Zak
• 11:46   how to watch parse/plan trees Hannu Krosing
• 11:46   Re: Duplicate-key-detection failure case found in btree Jan Wieck
• 12:45   Re: how to watch parse/plan trees Holger Krug
• 12:59   Re: problems with new vacuum (??) Matthew T. O'Connor
• 14:10   Re: problems with new vacuum (??) Tom Lane
• 14:12   Re: Duplicate-key-detection failure case found in btree Tom Lane
• 14:40   Re: datetime error? Tom Lane
• 14:45   Re: how to watch parse/plan trees Tom Lane
• 14:45   Re: Feature proposal: generalizing deferred trigger events Tom Lane
• 15:15   Re: Feature proposal: generalizing deferred trigger events Holger Krug
• 15:30   Re: Feature proposal: generalizing deferred trigger events Tom Lane
• 15:59   Re: Feature proposal: generalizing deferred trigger events Holger Krug
• 16:15   Re: problems with new vacuum (??) Bruce Momjian
• 16:15   Re: problems with new vacuum (??) Bruce Momjian
• 16:39   Re: Feature proposal: generalizing deferred trigger events Holger Krug
• 16:39   Re: problems with new vacuum (??) Don Baccus
• 16:44   Re: problems with new vacuum (??) Tom Lane
• 19:11   Re: Bulkloading using COPY - ignore duplicates? Bruce Momjian
• 19:46   bug in join? Laurette Cisneros
• 19:50   software license question Barry Lind
• 20:11   Re: software license question Bruce Momjian
• 20:11   Re: software license question Tom Lane
• 20:11   Re: Bulkloading using COPY - ignore duplicates? Tom Lane
• 20:11   Re: bug in join? Tom Lane
• 20:14   Re: Bulkloading using COPY - ignore duplicates? Bruce Momjian
• 20:30   Re: bug in join? Laurette Cisneros
• 20:30   Re: Bulkloading using COPY - ignore duplicates? Tom Lane
• 20:30   Re: bug in join? Tom Lane
• 20:40   Re: bug in join? Laurette Cisneros
• 20:46   Re: bug in join? Tom Lane
• 20:46   Re: bug in join? Laurette Cisneros
• 21:30   Re: software license question Bruce Momjian
• 21:40   Re: bug in join? Laurette Cisneros
• 21:44   Re: Bulkloading using COPY - ignore duplicates? Bruce Momjian
• 22:11   Re: problems with new vacuum (??) Hannu Krosing
• 22:11   Re: bug in join? Tom Lane
• 22:15   Re: bug in join? Laurette Cisneros
• 22:15   Re: Bulkloading using COPY - ignore duplicates? Tom Lane
• 22:30   Re: software license question Ned Wolpert
• 23:20   Re: software license question Bruce Momjian
• 23:30   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Tatsuo Ishii

3 January 2002

• 01:30   Re: Bulkloading using COPY - ignore duplicates? Bruce Momjian
• 02:15   Re: bug in join? Tom Lane
• 03:45   Re: ADD PRIMARY KEY and ADD UNIQUE Bruce Momjian
• 04:10   Re: Possible bug in vacuum redo Bruce Momjian
• 04:14   Re: pgcryto failures on freebsd/alpha Bruce Momjian
• 04:15   Re: Status on RC1? Bruce Momjian
• 04:30   Re: contrib idea Bruce Momjian
• 04:40   Re: PGSQL - FAQ 4.1 Bruce Momjian
• 05:30   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Bruce Momjian
• 05:30   Re: pgcryto failures on freebsd/alpha Marko Kreen
• 05:44   Re: pgcryto failures on freebsd/alpha Bruce Momjian
• 05:46   Re: pgcryto failures on freebsd/alpha Marko Kreen
• 06:00   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Bruce Momjian
• 06:11   Re: contrib/dbase Bruce Momjian
• 06:11   Updated TODO item Bruce Momjian
• 07:16   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Tatsuo Ishii
• 07:41   Re: Updated TODO item Thomas Swan
• 09:41   Re: datetime error? Karel Zak
• 11:13   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 11:44   DDLs in Transactions...? james@unifiedmind.com (James Thornton)
• 11:44   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Jeffrey W. Baker
• 11:46   Re: Are we accepting cancel interrupts too often? Tom Lane
• 11:46   Re: Are we accepting cancel interrupts too often? Bruce Momjian
• 11:46   PL/(pg)J Laszlo Hornyak
• 11:46   Error: SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL must be called before any query Kevin Xiao
• 11:46   Re: Are we accepting cancel interrupts too often? Bruce Momjian
• 11:46   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Jeffrey W. Baker
• 11:46   Re: Are we accepting cancel interrupts too often? Tom Lane
• 11:46   SET DATESTYLE to time_t style for client libraries? Adam Haberlach
• 11:49   Re: [GENERAL] date/time formats in 7.2 wsheldah@lexmark.com
• 11:52   Re: psql misbehaves because of a simple typo Serguei Mokhov
• 11:56   ODBC connect string format differs between ODBC driver versions? Julian Mehnle, Linksystem Muenchen
• 12:17   setof (more than one column) Reinoud van Leeuwen
• 13:12   Re: SET DATESTYLE to time_t style for client libraries? Tom Lane
• 13:16   Re: PGSQL - FAQ 4.1 Thomas Lockhart
• 13:31   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Tom Lane
• 13:46   Re: SET DATESTYLE to time_t style for client libraries? Thomas Lockhart
• 14:01   Re: PGSQL - FAQ 4.1 Tom Lane
• 14:11   Re: datetime error? Thomas Lockhart
• 15:01   Re: [BUGS] Bug #549: select table privilege in postgres allows user to create index on the table Tom Lane
• 15:15   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Bruce Momjian
• 15:21   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Bruce Momjian
• 15:41   Re: [BUGS] Bug #549: select table privilege in postgres allows Bruce Momjian
• 15:41   Re: PGSQL - FAQ 4.1 Bruce Momjian
• 15:45   Re: [BUGS] Bug #549: select table privilege in postgres allows user to create index on the table Tom Lane
• 15:46   Re: [BUGS] Bug #549: select table privilege in postgres allows Bruce Momjian
• 15:47   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Tom Lane
• 15:48   Re: Updated TODO item Bruce Momjian
• 16:01   Re: Announcement: libpkixpq 0.1 released Ross J. Reedstrom
• 16:16   Re: Smb to get involved Ross J. Reedstrom
• 16:17   More problem with scripts Bruce Momjian
• 16:21   Re: Updated TODO item Thomas Swan
• 16:32   Re: Updated TODO item Bruce Momjian
• 16:46   Re: Bulkloading using COPY - ignore duplicates? Bruce Momjian
• 17:02   Re: More problem with scripts Brent Verner
• 17:13   Re: Smb to get involved Pavlo Baron
• 17:32   Re: More problem with scripts Bruce Momjian
• 17:32   Re: More problem with scripts Brent Verner
• 18:13   Re: More problem with scripts Brent Verner
• 18:17   Re: More problem with scripts Bruce Momjian
• 18:41   Re: Bulkloading using COPY - ignore duplicates? Tom Lane
• 18:45   Re: SET DATESTYLE to time_t style for client libraries? Adam Haberlach
• 18:46   Re: Bulkloading using COPY - ignore duplicates? Bruce Momjian
• 18:46   Re: DDLs in Transactions...? Mark Pritchard
• 19:01   Re: More problem with scripts Tom Lane
• 19:14   Re: Bulkloading using COPY - ignore duplicates? Mikheev, Vadim
• 19:15   Re: Bulkloading using COPY - ignore duplicates? Bruce Momjian
• 19:16   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Fredrik Estreen
• 19:50   postgresql.conf syntax Bruce Momjian
• 20:14   Re: SET DATESTYLE to time_t style for client libraries? Jason Earl
• 20:41   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Hannu Krosing
• 20:46   Re: More problem with scripts Peter Eisentraut
• 20:51   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Hannu Krosing
• 21:19   Re: More problem with scripts Thomas Lockhart
• 21:47   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Tom Lane
• 22:51   Re: More problem with scripts Brent Verner
• 23:13   Re: Updated TODO item Gavin Sherry
• 23:16   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Tom Lane
• 23:46   Re: Updated TODO item Gavin Sherry

4 January 2002

• 00:02   shmctl portability problem Tom Lane
• 00:41   Transaction tests on SMP Linux Kenny H Klatt
• 01:15   Re: shmctl portability problem Haroldo Stenger
• 01:45   Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl? Palle Girgensohn
• 02:11   Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl? Tom Lane
• 02:15   Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl? Peter Eisentraut
• 02:41   Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl? Palle Girgensohn
• 02:45   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Bruce Momjian
• 02:45   Re: Updated TODO item Bruce Momjian
• 02:46   Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:51   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Bruce Momjian
• 03:01   Re: shmctl portability problem Bruce Momjian
• 03:11   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Tom Lane
• 03:14   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Bruce Momjian
• 03:41   Re: More problem with scripts Bruce Momjian
• 03:45   Re: PGSQL - FAQ 4.1 Bruce Momjian
• 03:51   Re: postgresql.conf syntax Bruce Momjian
• 04:02   Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 04:11   RC1 time? Bruce Momjian
• 04:12   Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl? Marc G. Fournier
• 04:31   Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl? Tom Lane
• 04:41   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Fredrik Estreen
• 04:44   Re: RC1 time? Bruce Momjian
• 04:46   Re: RC1 time? Tom Lane
• 04:51   freebsd/alpha probs Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 05:01   Re: RC1 time? Tom Lane
• 05:13   Re: freebsd/alpha probs Tom Lane
• 05:16   Re: RC1 time? Bruce Momjian
• 05:41   Re: Bulkloading using COPY - ignore duplicates? Daniel Kalchev
• 05:51   Re: RC1 time? Oleg Bartunov
• 06:02   Re: Bulkloading using COPY - ignore duplicates? Vadim Mikheev
• 06:16   Re: Bulkloading using COPY - ignore duplicates? Daniel Kalchev
• 08:42   Re: datetime error? Karel Zak
• 10:12   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Hannu Krosing
• 11:16   Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl? Palle Girgensohn
• 11:21   Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl? Palle Girgensohn
• 12:12   sig 11 in RC3 mlw
• 12:22   Syntax changes in 7.2 Dwayne Miller
• 13:16   Re: datetime error? Thomas Lockhart
• 14:01   Re: datetime error? Thomas Lockhart
• 14:13   Re: sig 11 in RC3 Tom Lane
• 14:43   ON ERROR triggers Holger Krug
• 14:46   Re: sig 11 in RC3 Holger Krug
• 15:12   Re: Updated TODO item Kaare Rasmussen
• 16:42   Re: Syntax changes in 7.2 Bruce Momjian
• 16:43   Re: Bulkloading using COPY - ignore duplicates? Bruce Momjian
• 16:46   Re: Updated TODO item Bruce Momjian
• 17:12   Re: Updated TODO item Bruce Momjian
• 17:12   Re: ON ERROR triggers Jan Wieck
• 17:16   Re: Updated TODO item Doug McNaught
• 17:46   Re: Syntax changes in 7.2 Dwayne Miller
• 17:52   Re: ON ERROR triggers Mikheev, Vadim
• 18:16   Re: Bulkloading using COPY - ignore duplicates? Mikheev, Vadim
• 19:12   O_DIRECT use Bruce Momjian
• 19:32   Re: O_DIRECT use Bruce Momjian
• 19:42   Re: O_DIRECT use Tom Lane
• 19:53   Re: O_DIRECT use Bruce Momjian
• 20:02   Re: O_DIRECT use Tom Lane
• 20:14   Re: More problem with scripts Brent Verner
• 20:16   Re: O_DIRECT use Brent Verner
• 20:16   Re: O_DIRECT use Tom Lane
• 21:16   Re: O_DIRECT use Bruce Momjian
• 21:16   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Tom Lane
• 21:16   Re: O_DIRECT use Bruce Momjian
• 21:16   Re: O_DIRECT use Bruce Momjian
• 22:32   Re: O_DIRECT use Matthew Kirkwood
• 22:46   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Bruce Momjian
• 23:41   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:46   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Tom Lane

5 January 2002

• 02:11   Some interesting results from tweaking spinlocks Tom Lane
• 02:46   Re: Some interesting results from tweaking spinlocks Bruce Momjian
• 03:02   Re: Some interesting results from tweaking spinlocks Tom Lane
• 03:16   Re: Some interesting results from tweaking spinlocks Bruce Momjian
• 03:16   Re: Some interesting results from tweaking spinlocks Bruce Momjian
• 03:16   Re: Some interesting results from tweaking spinlocks Tom Lane
• 03:42   Re: Some interesting results from tweaking spinlocks Tom Lane
• 03:42   Re: Some interesting results from tweaking spinlocks Bruce Momjian
• 03:45   Re: Some interesting results from tweaking spinlocks Bruce Momjian
• 04:12   Re: Some interesting results from tweaking spinlocks Bruce Momjian
• 04:12   Re: Some interesting results from tweaking spinlocks Tom Lane
• 06:02   Re: Some interesting results from tweaking spinlocks Brent Verner
• 06:52   pgcryto strangeness... Sean Chittenden
• 11:16   Re: Some interesting results from tweaking spinlocks mlw
• 13:16   Re: Some interesting results from tweaking spinlocks mlw
• 15:02   Re: RC1 time? Marc G. Fournier
• 15:12   Re: RC1 time? Marc G. Fournier
• 15:46   Re: Some interesting results from tweaking spinlocks Tom Lane
• 16:16   Re: RC1 time? Oleg Bartunov
• 17:02   Re: Some interesting results from tweaking spinlocks Tom Lane
• 17:16   Re: pgcryto strangeness... Sean Chittenden
• 17:16   Re: RC1 time? Marc G. Fournier
• 18:12   Re: pgcryto strangeness... Joe Conway
• 18:14   Re: pgcryto strangeness... Sean Chittenden
• 18:46   testing 123 Vince Vielhaber
• 19:02   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Hannu Krosing
• 19:15   Re: Some interesting results from tweaking spinlocks Hannu Krosing
• 19:16   Re: pgcryto strangeness... Joe Conway
• 19:42   Re: pgcryto strangeness... Tom Lane
• 19:42   Re: Some interesting results from tweaking spinlocks Brent Verner
• 20:02   Re: pgcryto strangeness... Sean Chittenden
• 20:12   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Tom Lane
• 20:15   Re: Some interesting results from tweaking spinlocks Tom Lane

6 January 2002

• 00:02   Re: Some interesting results from tweaking spinlocks Brent Verner
• 00:17   Re: Some interesting results from tweaking spinlocks Bruce Momjian
• 00:42   Re: Some interesting results from tweaking spinlocks Tom Lane
• 01:12   Re: Some interesting results from tweaking spinlocks Tom Lane
• 02:45   pgbench, consistency? mlw
• 03:42   pgbench -i spends all its time doing CHECKPOINT Tom Lane
• 04:42   Re: pgbench -i spends all its time doing CHECKPOINT Tom Lane
• 04:45   Re: pgbench -i spends all its time doing CHECKPOINT Bruce Momjian
• 04:45   Re: pgbench -i spends all its time doing CHECKPOINT Bruce Momjian
• 04:52   Re: pgbench -i spends all its time doing CHECKPOINT Tom Lane
• 06:16   Re: pgbench -i spends all its time doing CHECKPOINT Tatsuo Ishii
• 07:16   anoncvs Gavin Sherry
• 08:46   Re: anoncvs Oleg Bartunov
• 10:12   fork() while connected Michael Meskes
• 10:16   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Ashley Cambrell
• 12:32   Re: fork() while connected Doug McNaught
• 16:02   Re: pgbench -i spends all its time doing CHECKPOINT Bruce Momjian
• 16:42   Spinning verses sleeping in s_lock mlw
• 16:42   Re: pgbench -i spends all its time doing CHECKPOINT Tom Lane
• 17:16   Re: anoncvs Tom Lane
• 17:42   Re: anoncvs Marc G. Fournier
• 17:45   Re: Spinning verses sleeping in s_lock Tom Lane
• 18:02   Re: pgbench -i spends all its time doing CHECKPOINT Bruce Momjian
• 18:32   Re: Spinning verses sleeping in s_lock mlw
• 23:16   Effects of pgbench "scale factor" Tom Lane
• 23:42   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Tom Lane

7 January 2002

• 00:02   Re: Effects of pgbench "scale factor" Bruce Momjian
• 00:12   Re: pgcryto strangeness... Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 00:14   Re: pgcryto strangeness... Sean Chittenden
• 00:47   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Tom Lane
• 01:12   Re: Spinning verses sleeping in s_lock Tom Lane
• 02:22   Further info on LWLock behavior Tom Lane
• 03:42   ecpg compile error on AIX Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:42   Re: pgcryto strangeness... Marko Kreen
• 14:04   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Hannu Krosing
• 14:24   Re: Syntax changes in 7.2 Holger Krug
• 14:24   Re: fork() while connected Michael Meskes
• 14:44   Re: ON ERROR triggers Holger Krug
• 14:44   Re: ecpg compile error on AIX Michael Meskes
• 14:54   Re: ON ERROR triggers Holger Krug
• 14:54   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Tom Lane
• 15:04   Why MemoryContextSwitch in ExecRelCheck ? Holger Krug
• 15:34   Re: Why MemoryContextSwitch in ExecRelCheck ? Tom Lane
• 15:55   Re: ecpg compile error on AIX Tom Lane
• 16:24   Re: bug in join? Laurette Cisneros
• 16:34   Re: Why MemoryContextSwitch in ExecRelCheck ? Holger Krug
• 16:44   Re: Why MemoryContextSwitch in ExecRelCheck ? Tom Lane
• 16:54   again on index usage Daniel Kalchev
• 17:14   Re: pgcryto strangeness... Tom Lane
• 17:24   Re: ON ERROR triggers Mikheev, Vadim
• 17:44   Re: again on index usage Tom Lane
• 17:54   Re: ON ERROR triggers Don Baccus
• 19:14   Re: ecpg compile error on AIX Tom Lane
• 20:44   Re: RC1 time? Thomas Lockhart
• 20:54   Default permissions of system catalogs Peter Eisentraut
• 21:44   Re: ecpg compile error on AIX Bruce Momjian
• 21:54   Re: RC1 time? Oleg Bartunov
• 22:24   Re: ecpg compile error on AIX Tom Lane
• 22:24   Re: ecpg compile error on AIX Peter Eisentraut
• 22:24   Re: ecpg compile error on AIX Bruce Momjian
• 22:44   Re: ecpg compile error on AIX Peter Eisentraut
• 23:04   Re: ecpg compile error on AIX Tom Lane
• 23:24   Re: ecpg compile error on AIX Tom Lane
• 23:54   Re: again on index usage Sean Chittenden

8 January 2002

• 01:54   Re: ecpg compile error on AIX Bruce Momjian
• 03:14   Re: RC1 time? Jan Wieck
• 06:04   Re: ON ERROR triggers Holger Krug
• 06:55   Re: Default permissions of system catalogs Dave Page
• 07:14   Re: ON ERROR triggers Stephan Szabo
• 07:24   Re: again on index usage Daniel Kalchev
• 07:24   Re: ON ERROR triggers Holger Krug
• 08:04   GETTIMEOFDAY_1ARG change Ulrich Neumann
• 08:24   (void *) with shmat Ulrich Neumann
• 10:24   Re: (void *) with shmat mlw
• 12:04   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Hannu Krosing
• 12:04   Time keyword Dwayne Miller
• 12:04   Time as keyword Dwayne Miller
• 12:04   preannouncement: libpkixpq 0.3 will have crypto Bear Giles
• 12:14   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Hannu Krosing
• 12:14   postgresql 7.2b4 bug guard
• 12:14   Re: Some interesting results from tweaking spinlocks Rod Taylor
• 12:14   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Jeffrey W. Baker
• 12:14   Re: Updated TODO item Kaare Rasmussen
• 12:24   Re: ecpg compile error on AIX Michael Meskes
• 12:24   Re: ecpg compile error on AIX Michael Meskes
• 12:24   Antw: Re: (void *) with shmat Ulrich Neumann
• 12:24   Re: pgcryto strangeness... Bear Giles
• 12:24   JDBC: why is PGobject class instead of interface? Bear Giles
• 12:24   Announcement: libpkixpq 0.3 - with limited OpenPGP support Bear Giles
• 12:45   Re: (void *) with shmat Tom Lane
• 12:55   Re: RC1 time? mlw
• 12:55   Re: again on index usage Tom Lane
• 13:05   Re: Time as keyword Tom Lane
• 13:05   Re: GETTIMEOFDAY_1ARG change Thomas Lockhart
• 13:14   Re: Time as keyword Holger Krug
• 13:25   Re: JDBC: why is PGobject class instead of interface? Holger Krug
• 13:34   Finally ready to go for RC1? Tom Lane
• 14:24   Re: Default permissions of system catalogs Bruno Wolff III
• 14:24   Re: RC1 time? Marc G. Fournier
• 14:24   Re: Default permissions of system catalogs Peter Eisentraut
• 14:24   Re: RC1 time? Marc G. Fournier
• 15:14   Re: postgresql 7.2b4 bug Tom Lane
• 15:24   Re: GETTIMEOFDAY_1ARG change Tom Lane
• 15:24   Re: Time as keyword Thomas Lockhart
• 16:54   Antw: Re: (void *) with shmat Ulrich Neumann
• 16:54   Antw: Re: GETTIMEOFDAY_1ARG change Ulrich Neumann
• 17:05   Re: Default permissions of system catalogs Bruce Momjian
• 17:05   Re: JDBC: why is PGobject class instead of interface? Barry Lind
• 17:14   Strange results with date/interval arithmetic Bruce Momjian
• 17:15   WAL FILES Gershon M. Wolfe
• 17:24   VPATH builds fail Tom Lane
• 17:57   Re: VPATH builds fail Tom Lane
• 18:36   Re: VPATH builds fail Tom Lane
• 18:36   Re: VPATH builds fail Tom Lane
• 18:37   Re: VPATH builds fail Peter Eisentraut
• 20:25   Feature Request: DROP ALL FROM DATABASE database_name Thomas Swan
• 20:35   Re: Strange results with date/interval arithmetic Tom Lane
• 20:44   Re: Strange results with date/interval arithmetic Bruce Momjian
• 20:55   Re: Strange results with date/interval arithmetic Tom Lane
• 20:55   Re: Strange results with date/interval arithmetic Bruce Momjian
• 21:04   Re: VPATH builds fail Peter Eisentraut
• 21:24   Re: WAL FILES Peter Eisentraut
• 21:26   ECPG warning Peter Eisentraut
• 21:45   Re: Feature Request: DROP ALL FROM DATABASE database_name Bruce Momjian
• 21:55   Re: Feature Request: DROP ALL FROM DATABASE database_name Tom Lane
• 22:14   Re: Feature Request: DROP ALL FROM DATABASE database_name Thomas Swan
• 22:34   Re: ECPG warning Tom Lane
• 23:44   7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L Tatsuo Ishii

9 January 2002

• 03:24   Re: Feature Request: DROP ALL FROM DATABASE database_name Marc G. Fournier
• 03:44   postmaster vs. postgres Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 04:14   Re: Feature Request: DROP ALL FROM DATABASE database_name Thomas Swan
• 04:14   Re: postmaster vs. postgres Bruce Momjian
• 04:24   Re: postmaster vs. postgres Tom Lane
• 04:24   Re: postmaster vs. postgres Gavin Sherry
• 04:54   Re: Feature Request: DROP ALL FROM DATABASE database_name carl garland
• 04:54   Converting oracle data in to postgresql erigeneni srinivasulu
• 05:24   Re: Converting oracle data in to postgresql Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 05:44   ECPG: include sqlca Michael Meskes
• 05:54   Re: again on index usage Daniel Kalchev
• 06:55   Re: Time as keyword Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 07:24   Re: ECPG: include sqlca Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 07:55   Re: again on index usage Hiroshi Inoue
• 08:05   Re: 7.2 is slow? Hannu Krosing
• 08:25   Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L Hannu Krosing
• 08:55   Re: RC1 time? Oleg Bartunov
• 09:54   Some architectures need "signed char" declarations Oliver Elphick
• 10:04   Re: RC1 time? Gavin Sherry
• 10:15   --with-tcl build on AIX (and others) fails Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 10:44   Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L Tatsuo Ishii
• 10:54   Re: RC1 time? (Server time) mlw
• 11:54   Re: Some architectures need "signed char" declarations Doug McNaught
• 11:54   Re: RC1 time? (Server time) Oleg Bartunov
• 13:28   Re: again on index usage Tom Lane
• 13:36   Re: Some architectures need "signed char" declarations Tom Lane
• 13:36   Re: Time as keyword Tom Lane
• 13:55   Re: ECPG: include sqlca Bruce Momjian
• 14:14   pg_upgrade Bruce Momjian
• 14:14   Re: --with-tcl build on AIX (and others) fails Tom Lane
• 14:45   Re: Time as keyword Thomas Lockhart
• 14:55   Re: again on index usage Daniel Kalchev
• 15:15   Re: --with-tcl build on AIX (and others) fails Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 15:25   Re: Time as keyword Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 15:25   Re: --with-tcl build on AIX (and others) fails Bruce Momjian
• 15:25   Re: --with-tcl build on AIX (and others) fails Tom Lane
• 15:45   Re: Some architectures need "signed char" declarations Doug Royer
• 16:14   Does getopt() return "-1", or "EOF", at end? Tom Lane
• 17:24   Re: Some architectures need "signed char" declarations Tom Lane
• 17:54   Re: again on index usage Tom Lane
• 17:54   Re: RC1 time? Marc G. Fournier
• 18:15   Re: again on index usage Daniel Kalchev
• 18:15   Re: Some architectures need "signed char" declarations Doug McNaught
• 18:25   Re: RC1 time? Tom Lane
• 18:25   Re: again on index usage Tom Lane
• 18:35   Re: Some architectures need "signed char" declarations Tom Lane
• 18:55   pg_dump bug ... or not? Marc G. Fournier
• 18:55   Re: Does getopt() return "-1", or "EOF", at end? Doug McNaught
• 18:55   Re: Does getopt() return "-1", or "EOF", at end? Dominic J. Eidson
• 19:15   Re: Does getopt() return "-1", or "EOF", at end? Peter Eisentraut
• 19:15   Re: Does getopt() return "-1", or "EOF", at end? Bruce Momjian
• 19:45   Re: Does getopt() return "-1", or "EOF", at end? Tom Lane
• 19:45   Re: Does getopt() return "-1", or "EOF", at end? David Terrell
• 19:45   Re: Does getopt() return "-1", or "EOF", at end? Doug Royer
• 20:25   Bzip2 postgres tarballs Greg Sabino Mullane
• 20:25   Re: RC1 time? Vince Vielhaber
• 21:05   Re: Does getopt() return "-1", or "EOF", at end? Doug Royer
• 21:15   Re: RC1 time? Marc G. Fournier
• 21:15   Re: pg_dump bug ... or not? Tom Lane
• 21:24   Re: Does getopt() return "-1", or "EOF", at end? Tom Lane
• 21:54   Re: Potential bug in pg_dump ... Brent Verner
• 22:14   Re: Potential bug in pg_dump ... Tom Lane
• 22:25   Re: Potential bug in pg_dump ... Brent Verner

10 January 2002

• 01:05   Increasing checkpoint distance helps 7.2 noticeably Tom Lane
• 01:44   Re: DOSSIER Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:44   Re: Increasing checkpoint distance helps 7.2 noticeably Don Baccus
• 01:54   DOSSIER postgresql stuff Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 04:54   Re: RC1 time? Oleg Bartunov
• 07:25   Re: Increasing checkpoint distance helps 7.2 noticeably Justin Clift
• 07:45   Re: again on index usage Daniel Kalchev
• 08:45   Re: ECPG: include sqlca Michael Meskes
• 09:05   Re: again on index usage Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 09:24   seq scan startup cost Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 09:54   Re: again on index usage Daniel Kalchev
• 10:05   Re: again on index usage Daniel Kalchev
• 10:35   Re: Does getopt() return "-1", or "EOF", at end? Richard Kuhns
• 12:55   Re: again on index usage Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 12:55   Re: Usenet service (was: RC1 time?) Alessio Bragadini
• 13:15   Re: again on index usage Tom Lane
• 13:15   Re: again on index usage Tom Lane
• 13:45   Re: seq scan startup cost Tom Lane
• 14:06   Re: again on index usage Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 14:26   Re: again on index usage Daniel Kalchev
• 14:55   Re: again on index usage Daniel Kalchev
• 15:25   Re: again on index usage Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 15:57   Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L Tom Lane
• 17:55   Re: again on index usage Bruce Momjian
• 18:25   Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L Bruce Momjian
• 19:25   Sequence rows need to have FrozenTransactionId Tom Lane

11 January 2002

• 00:25   Re: pg_upgrade Bruce Momjian
• 00:55   Re: pg_upgrade Joe Conway
• 01:15   Re: Potential bug in pg_dump ... Brent Verner
• 02:25   Postgres in bash-mode Alexander Pucher
• 02:25   Re: again on index usage Daniel Kalchev
• 02:35   Re: Postgres in bash-mode Rod Taylor
• 02:55   Re: Postgres in bash-mode Peter Eisentraut
• 03:25   Re: pg_upgrade Peter Eisentraut
• 03:25   Re: pg_upgrade Bruce Momjian
• 03:45   Re: pg_upgrade Daniel Kalchev
• 03:45   Re: again on index usage Daniel Kalchev
• 03:55   Re: pg_upgrade Bruce Momjian
• 04:05   Re: pg_upgrade Tom Lane
• 04:25   Re: pg_upgrade Bruce Momjian
• 05:45   Home Location Registry (HLR) and VLR databases Jean-Michel POURE
• 06:19   Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 06:45   Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L Tatsuo Ishii
• 08:55   Problems with simple_heap_update and Form_pg_relcheck Holger Krug
• 09:05   Re: Problems with simple_heap_update and Form_pg_relcheck Holger Krug
• 09:55   Re: again on index usage Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 13:55   why? Vince Vielhaber
• 14:45   Re: again on index usage Bruce Momjian
• 14:45   Re: why? Tom Lane
• 14:55   Re: again on index usage Tom Lane
• 14:55   Re: again on index usage Don Baccus
• 15:05   Re: again on index usage Don Baccus
• 15:15   Re: Problems with simple_heap_update and Form_pg_relcheck Tom Lane
• 15:16   Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L Tom Lane
• 15:16   Re: again on index usage Daniel Kalchev
• 15:25   Re: again on index usage Ross J. Reedstrom
• 15:45   Re: again on index usage Tom Lane
• 15:45   Re: Problems with simple_heap_update and Form_pg_relcheck Holger Krug
• 16:25   Re: again on index usage Don Baccus
• 16:26   Re: again on index usage Bruce Momjian
• 16:26   Commercial: New Book!! PostgreSQL book is released into the market computertechnology
• 16:26   Re: Time as keyword Dwayne Miller
• 16:55   Re: Bad interval external representation jeff.brickley@motorola.com (Jeff)
• 16:55   postgresql-7.2b3-betterquote.patch Elliot Lee
• 16:55   Re: again on index usage Bruce Momjian
• 16:55   Bad interval external representation jeff.brickley@motorola.com (Jeff)
• 17:16   Re: again on index usage mlw
• 17:25   Re: again on index usage Tom Lane
• 17:35   Re: again on index usage Don Baccus
• 17:55   Re: again on index usage Don Baccus
• 21:35   Re: Potential bug in pg_dump ... Tom Lane

12 January 2002

• 00:26   Re: Potential bug in pg_dump ... Brent Verner
• 01:55   checkpoint hang in 7.2b4 mlw
• 02:25   Re: checkpoint hang in 7.2b4 Tom Lane
• 02:45   Re: checkpoint hang in 7.2b4 mlw
• 05:25   timestamptz + interval fixed Thomas Lockhart
• 06:45   Re: Postgres in bash-mode David Terrell
• 09:55   Re: again on index usage Daniel Kalchev
• 12:15   Re: Postgres in bash-mode Karl DeBisschop
• 12:56   Re: checkpoint hang in 7.2b4 Hannu Krosing
• 13:15   Re: again on index usage Hannu Krosing
• 13:45   Re: again on index usage Don Baccus
• 14:25   Re: checkpoint hang in 7.2b4 Tom Lane
• 17:25   benchmarking journalling file systems, fsync, and buffers. mlw
• 18:55   Theory about XLogFlush startup failures Tom Lane
• 21:25   Re: benchmarking journalling file systems, fsync, and buffers. Tom Lane
• 21:55   Re: benchmarking journalling file systems, fsync, and buffers. mlw
• 23:25   initdb, pg_upgrade Bruce Momjian

13 January 2002

• 01:25   Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:55   Re: timestamptz + interval fixed Bruce Momjian
• 02:25   Problem reloading regression database Bruce Momjian
• 02:25   Re: Problem reloading regression database Bruce Momjian
• 02:55   Re: Problem reloading regression database Tom Lane
• 02:55   Re: Problem reloading regression database Bruce Momjian
• 03:55   pg_upgrade ready for testing Bruce Momjian
• 04:25   Re: Postgres in bash-mode Maarten.Boekhold@reuters.com
• 04:25   About pg_upgrade Peter Eisentraut
• 04:25   Re: pg_upgrade Peter Eisentraut
• 06:56   mysql-pgsql comparison Michael Meskes
• 09:55   Re: Postgres in bash-mode Karl DeBisschop
• 09:55   Re: Postgres in bash-mode David Terrell
• 09:55   Re: Postgres in bash-mode Karl DeBisschop
• 11:25   Re: mysql-pgsql comparison Jean-Michel POURE
• 13:05   Re: mysql-pgsql comparison mlw
• 13:16   Re: About pg_upgrade Bruce Momjian
• 13:35   Re: Problem reloading regression database Brent Verner
• 14:55   Re: Problem reloading regression database Tom Lane
• 14:55   Re: mysql-pgsql comparison Peter Eisentraut
• 15:16   Re: mysql-pgsql comparison Tom Lane
• 15:46   Re: Problem reloading regression database Brent Verner
• 15:55   Re: About pg_upgrade Bruce Momjian
• 15:55   Re: mysql-pgsql comparison Oleg Bartunov
• 16:16   Commercial: New Book!! PostgreSQL book is released into the market Al Dev
• 17:56   Re: mysql-pgsql comparison Tom Lane
• 17:56   Re: Problem reloading regression database Brent Verner
• 18:26   Re: Problem reloading regression database Tom Lane
• 19:16   Re: mysql-pgsql comparison Matthew Kirkwood
• 19:55   Re: Problem reloading regression database Brent Verner
• 20:25   Re: mysql-pgsql comparison Justin Clift
• 20:26   Re: mysql-pgsql comparison Justin Clift
• 20:26   Re: mysql-pgsql comparison Justin Clift
• 23:36   Re: mysql-pgsql comparison Peter Eisentraut
• 23:46   Release time Peter Eisentraut

14 January 2002

• 00:56   Re: Problem reloading regression database Brent Verner
• 01:25   Re: Release time Tom Lane
• 01:55   Re: Problem reloading regression database Tom Lane
• 01:55   Re: Problem reloading regression database Brent Verner
• 02:36   Re: Release time Tom Lane
• 02:36   Re: Release time Marc G. Fournier
• 02:46   Re: Problem reloading regression database Brent Verner
• 03:25   Re: Release time Marc G. Fournier
• 03:26   Re: Problem reloading regression database Tom Lane
• 03:46   Re: Problem reloading regression database Brent Verner
• 03:55   Re: Problem reloading regression database Tom Lane
• 04:16   Tablespace and clustering Andy Samuel
• 07:26   Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 09:26   Re: again on index usage Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 10:46   Re: mysql-pgsql comparison Michael Meskes
• 10:46   Re: mysql-pgsql comparison Michael Meskes
• 11:16   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Luis Amigo
• 11:36   Re: mysql-pgsql comparison Jean-Michel POURE
• 11:55   articles [was: mysql-pgsql comparison] Bear Giles
• 11:56   Re: checkpoint hang in 7.2b4 Hannu Krosing
• 11:56   bug in permission handling? Martin Renters
• 11:57   Announcement: libpkixpq 0.4 (pkix + strong crypto for db) Bear Giles
• 12:06   Re: Release time Marc G. Fournier
• 14:26   Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L Tom Lane
• 14:27   Re: bug in permission handling? Tom Lane
• 14:29   Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 14:36   Re: articles [was: mysql-pgsql comparison] Roderick A. Anderson
• 14:47   Re: articles [was: mysql-pgsql comparison] Bruce Momjian
• 15:01   Re: bug in permission handling? Tom Lane
• 15:49   Re: bug in permission handling? Martin Renters
• 15:49   unicode words guard
• 17:15   Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L Alex Avriette
• 18:29   Re: Release time Tom Lane
• 18:59   Re: bug in permission handling? Matthew T. O'Connor
• 19:09   Re: [ANNOUNCE] Commercial: New Book!! PostgreSQL book is released into Jan Wieck
• 21:49   Re: bug in permission handling? Peter Eisentraut
• 23:29   Re: unicode words Tatsuo Ishii

15 January 2002

• 00:29   Re: Theory about XLogFlush startup failures Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:49   Re: Problem reloading regression database Brent Verner
• 00:49   Re: bug in permission handling? Lincoln Yeoh
• 01:09   Re: Problem reloading regression database Tom Lane
• 01:09   Re: Theory about XLogFlush startup failures Tom Lane
• 01:29   Re: Problem reloading regression database Brent Verner
• 01:59   Re: Theory about XLogFlush startup failures Tom Lane
• 01:59   Re: bug in permission handling? Gavin Sherry
• 01:59   Re: bug in permission handling? Gavin Sherry
• 02:19   Re: Theory about XLogFlush startup failures Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:39   Re: Theory about XLogFlush startup failures Tom Lane
• 02:49   Re: Theory about XLogFlush startup failures Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:49   Re: About pg_upgrade Bruce Momjian
• 02:59   Re: Theory about XLogFlush startup failures Tom Lane
• 03:09   Re: Theory about XLogFlush startup failures Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:19   pg_upgrade activated? Bruce Momjian
• 03:39   Re: About pg_upgrade Bruce Momjian
• 03:49   Re: Problem reloading regression database Brent Verner
• 03:49   Re: About pg_upgrade Peter Eisentraut
• 04:09   Re: Problem reloading regression database Tom Lane
• 04:19   Re: Problem reloading regression database Brent Verner
• 04:19   Re: About pg_upgrade Bruce Momjian
• 04:29   Re: Problem reloading regression database Brent Verner
• 04:39   problem with notify/listen Barry Lind
• 05:19   Re: Problem reloading regression database Brent Verner
• 07:19   FATAL 1: Relation 'pg_shadow' does not exist Gavin Sherry
• 07:59   Re: FATAL 1: Relation 'pg_shadow' does not exist Hiroshi Inoue
• 07:59   Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 08:22   Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 08:39   Re: FATAL 1: Relation 'pg_shadow' does not exist Gavin Sherry
• 09:49   Psql in cluster-machines Luis Amigo
• 11:29   Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L Tatsuo Ishii
• 12:19   Re: again on index usage Hiroshi Inoue
• 12:59   PostgreSQL v7.2b5 Released Marc G. Fournier
• 13:19   Re: Psql in cluster-machines Alex Avriette
• 13:29   Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L Tom Lane
• 13:39   Re: problem with notify/listen Tom Lane
• 14:01   Re: FATAL 1: Relation 'pg_shadow' does not exist Tom Lane
• 14:59   Re: PostgreSQL v7.2b5 Released teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 14:59   Re: Theory about XLogFlush startup failures Tom Lane
• 15:29   Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 15:49   Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L Tom Lane
• 18:59   Re: Theory about XLogFlush startup failures Hiroshi Inoue
• 19:09   Re: again on index usage Hiroshi Inoue
• 19:42   Re: FATAL 1: Relation 'pg_shadow' does not exist Jan Wieck
• 19:59   Re: FATAL 1: Relation 'pg_shadow' does not exist Tom Lane
• 20:29   Re: FATAL 1: Relation 'pg_shadow' does not exist Jan Wieck
• 20:39   Re: Theory about XLogFlush startup failures Tom Lane
• 20:39   RServ replication mlw
• 21:49   tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Tom Lane
• 22:19   Re: Theory about XLogFlush startup failures Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:09   Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L Tatsuo Ishii

16 January 2002

• 00:29   Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L Bruce Momjian
• 01:09   Procedural language permissions and consequences Peter Eisentraut
• 01:49   Re: Procedural language permissions and consequences Doug McNaught
• 03:29   Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L Bruce Momjian
• 03:39   Re: Procedural language permissions and consequences Tom Lane
• 03:49   Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L Tom Lane
• 05:49   Oracle to Postgres comparision erigeneni srinivasulu
• 06:09   Re: Psql in cluster-machines Luis Amigo
• 10:39   Re: Oracle to Postgres comparision mlw
• 12:19   backend/po, make update-po works strange Kovacs Zoltan
• 13:49   Re: RServ replication Turbo Fredriksson
• 14:49   Re: Procedural language permissions and consequences Peter Eisentraut
• 14:49   Re: Procedural language permissions and consequences Peter Eisentraut
• 14:59   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Command Prompt, Inc.
• 15:19   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Tom Lane
• 15:31   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 15:39   Re: backend/po, make update-po works strange Peter Eisentraut
• 15:50   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 16:03   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Tom Lane
• 16:20   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Tom Lane
• 16:32   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Jan Wieck
• 16:41   Re: RServ replication Justin Clift
• 16:41   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Tom Lane
• 17:29   Error in 7.2 rbt@barchord.com
• 18:10   Re: backend/po, make update-po works strange Kovacs Zoltan
• 18:19   Re: again on index usage Hiroshi Inoue
• 18:40   Re: backend/po, make update-po works strange Tom Lane
• 18:49   Re: Error in 7.2 Tom Lane
• 19:00   Re: [ANNOUNCE] Commercial: New Book!! PostgreSQL book is Doug Royer
• 19:20   Re: RServ replication mlw
• 19:20   Re: backend/po, make update-po works strange Peter Eisentraut
• 19:29   Re: Error in 7.2 Rod Taylor
• 19:50   Re: backend/po, make update-po works strange Tom Lane
• 20:49   question with beta5 Matthew T. O'Connor
• 21:19   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Bruce Momjian
• 21:29   Re: question with beta5 Tom Lane

17 January 2002

• 04:19   RC1 date? Bruce Momjian
• 07:10   CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW / TRIGGER Jean-Michel POURE
• 10:50   Performance Turbo Fredriksson
• 11:10   Re: RC1 date? Marc G. Fournier
• 11:19   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 11:30   Re: RC1 date? Daniel Kalchev
• 12:20   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Tom Lane
• 12:30   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 12:30   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Tom Lane
• 12:40   can't shrink relation Gavin Sherry
• 13:30   Re: can't shrink relation Tom Lane
• 13:30   Re: CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW / TRIGGER Jan Wieck
• 14:00   Re: [ADMIN] CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW / TRIGGER Tom Lane
• 15:50   Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Bruce Momjian
• 16:20   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Jan Wieck
• 16:40   Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Brent Verner
• 17:00   Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Bruce Momjian
• 19:50   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Tom Lane
• 20:30   Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Tom Lane
• 20:40   Re: [PATCHES] guc Peter Eisentraut
• 21:10   Re: [PATCHES] guc Tom Lane
• 21:20   Re: [PATCHES] guc Bruce Momjian
• 21:50   Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Bruce Momjian
• 22:30   Re: [ANNOUNCE] Commercial: New Book!! PostgreSQL book is Doug Royer
• 22:40   Re: [ANNOUNCE] Commercial: New Book!! PostgreSQL book is Justin Clift

18 January 2002

• 00:20   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Tom Lane
• 00:20   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:30   Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Tom Lane
• 00:30   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:40   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Tom Lane
• 01:50   Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Philip Warner
• 02:10   Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Tom Lane
• 02:10   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Jan Wieck
• 02:10   Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Philip Warner
• 02:10   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:20   Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Bruce Momjian
• 02:20   Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Bruce Momjian
• 02:20   Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Philip Warner
• 02:20   Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Bruce Momjian
• 02:40   Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Tom Lane
• 02:40   Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Tom Lane
• 02:40   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Bruce Momjian
• 02:49   Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Bruce Momjian
• 02:50   Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Bruce Momjian
• 02:50   Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Tom Lane
• 03:00   pg_upgrade Bruce Momjian
• 03:00   age() function? Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:19   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Bruce Momjian
• 03:30   Re: [PATCHES] guc Tom Lane
• 03:30   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:30   Re: [PATCHES] guc Peter Eisentraut
• 03:40   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Bruce Momjian
• 03:40   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Tom Lane
• 03:40   Re: age() function? Tom Lane
• 03:49   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:50   Re: age() function? Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:50   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Jan Wieck
• 04:00   Re: [PATCHES] guc Peter Eisentraut
• 04:00   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Bruce Momjian
• 04:10   Re: age() function? Bruce Momjian
• 04:20   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Joe Conway
• 04:20   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Jan Wieck
• 04:40   Geometric types (was Re: [PATCHES] guc) Tom Lane
• 04:40   Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Bruce Momjian
• 04:50   Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Philip Warner
• 04:50   Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Philip Warner
• 04:50   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Joe Conway
• 05:50   Re: age() function? Thomas Lockhart
• 06:00   Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny Hiroshi Inoue
• 12:31   contrib: int_array_aggregator() int_array_enum() mlw
• 14:01   [Robert.Hufsky@ser.at: autocommit in ecpg] Michael Meskes
• 14:30   Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Tom Lane
• 14:40   7.2b5 notes Dwayne Miller
• 15:11   Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Bruce Momjian
• 15:22   Re: [PATCHES] guc Liam Stewart
• 15:22   Re: [PATCHES] guc Tom Lane
• 15:41   Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Tom Lane
• 16:30   Re: 7.2b5 notes Peter Eisentraut
• 17:20   Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o Bruce Momjian
• 17:20   Confusing terminology Peter Eisentraut
• 17:40   Re: Procedural language permissions and consequences Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
• 17:40   Recovering a database Peter Bayley
• 17:40   Re: Recovering a database Steve Spencer
• 17:40   postgresql-7.2b5.tar.gz Joe Conway (wwc)
• 17:40   help regarding Postgresql? D'laila Pereira
• 17:40   Recover old version database files. Steve Spencer
• 17:50   Re: Ignore this one ... Yasuo Ohgaki
• 17:50   Re: Confusing terminology Tom Lane
• 17:50   user types API wish list Bear Giles
• 17:50   Ignorance time: when is 7.2 due ? Peter Galbavy
• 17:51   Re: Recovering a database Doug McNaught
• 18:00   jdbc:postgresql problem Vardan Gyurjyan
• 18:00   Re: help regarding Postgresql? steve boyle
• 18:02   Re: Recover old version database files. Doug McNaught
• 18:10   Text Column limits Chris Bowlby
• 18:10   Re: postgresql-7.2b5.tar.gz Tom Lane
• 18:10   Re: Ignorance time: when is 7.2 due ? Bruce Momjian
• 18:10   Re: postgresql-7.2b5.tar.gz Vince Vielhaber
• 18:20   Re: Recovering a database Matthew T. O'Connor
• 18:30   Re: user types API wish list Tom Lane
• 18:30   Re: Confusing terminology Bruce Momjian
• 18:40   Re: Text Column limits Doug McNaught
• 19:00   Re: [Robert.Hufsky@ser.at: autocommit in ecpg] Bruce Momjian
• 19:10   Re: Text Column limits Chris Bowlby
• 19:10   Re: Text Column limits Doug McNaught
• 19:10   Re: More problem with scripts Bruce Momjian
• 19:20   Re: Confusing terminology Peter Eisentraut
• 19:40   Re: Confusing terminology Bruce Momjian
• 19:50   Re: Confusing terminology Mike Mascari
• 20:10   Re: postgresql-7.2b5.tar.gz Joe Conway (wwc)
• 20:40   Re: postgresql-7.2b5.tar.gz Jason Earl
• 21:00   Re: postgresql-7.2b5.tar.gz Vince Vielhaber
• 21:50   Re: Confusing terminology Roderick A. Anderson
• 22:10   Re: Confusing terminology Arguile
• 22:30   pg_dump question Laurette Cisneros
• 22:40   Schemas vs. PostQUEL: resolving qualified identifiers Tom Lane
• 23:00   Re: pg_dump question Bruce Momjian
• 23:10   Re: pg_dump question Laurette Cisneros
• 23:40   Re: [NOVICE] Functions in C with Ornate Data Structures Tom Lane

19 January 2002

• 01:30   Re: [NOVICE] Functions in C with Ornate Data Structures Tom Lane
• 02:20   Re: Confusing terminology carl garland
• 03:40   Re: Ready for RC1? Marc G. Fournier
• 03:50   Ready for RC1? Tom Lane
• 12:10   Re: [NOVICE] Functions in C with Ornate Data Structures mlw
• 15:40   Re: Confusing terminology Roderick A. Anderson
• 16:20   Re: Confusing terminology Arguile
• 16:50   Re: Confusing terminology Mike Mascari

20 January 2002

• 04:00   PostgreSQL 8.0 and cross-platform capabilities Justin Clift
• 05:20   Re: PostgreSQL 8.0 and cross-platform capabilities Marc G. Fournier
• 10:10   Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Brent Verner
• 10:50   Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Brent Verner
• 16:01   Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Tom Lane
• 16:41   RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) Tom Lane
• 17:20   AOL buying RedHat? Vince Vielhaber
• 17:21   Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Tom Lane
• 17:41   Re: RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) Bruce Momjian
• 19:11   PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL alavoor
• 19:11   Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Tom Lane
• 19:21   Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Peter Eisentraut
• 19:31   Re: RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu Peter Eisentraut
• 19:50   Re: RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) Tom Lane
• 19:51   Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Tom Lane
• 20:11   Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL mlw
• 20:21   Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Peter Eisentraut
• 20:21   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Marc G. Fournier
• 20:41   Re: Confusing terminology Peter Eisentraut
• 21:01   Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Tom Lane
• 21:11   Re: --with-tcl build on AIX (and others) fails Tom Lane
• 22:11   Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Brent Verner
• 22:31   Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Tom Lane
• 22:41   Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Brent Verner

21 January 2002

• 01:11   Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Tom Lane
• 01:41   Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Peter Eisentraut
• 01:41   Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Tom Lane
• 02:01   Re: Text Column limits Chris Bowlby
• 02:11   Re: Text Column limits Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:50   Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL mlw
• 02:52   Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Bruce Momjian
• 03:11   Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Bruce Momjian
• 03:41   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Tom Lane
• 04:01   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Brent Verner
• 04:41   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Tom Lane
• 04:50   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Bruce Momjian
• 05:11   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Tom Lane
• 05:21   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Thomas Lockhart
• 05:41   Re: Ready for RC1? Brent Verner
• 05:41   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Brent Verner
• 05:51   Re: jdbc:postgresql problem Holger Krug
• 06:16   Re: RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) David Terrell
• 06:21   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL David Terrell
• 06:51   Re: RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 08:43   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Justin Clift
• 08:43   how to force planner to do nestloops instead of merge joins Luis Amigo
• 08:51   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Matthew Kirkwood
• 09:41   adding regression tests for PLs Brent Verner
• 11:21   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Bruce Momjian
• 11:31   Re: RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) Bruce Momjian
• 11:42   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Bruce Momjian
• 12:11   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Marc G. Fournier
• 12:21   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Justin Clift
• 12:21   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Marc G. Fournier
• 12:21   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Marc G. Fournier
• 12:31   Re: Ready for RC1? Marc G. Fournier
• 12:31   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Bruce Momjian
• 12:31   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Marc G. Fournier
• 12:31   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Marc G. Fournier
• 12:51   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Michael Tiemann
• 12:51   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Matthew Kirkwood
• 12:51   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Justin Clift
• 13:03   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Vince Vielhaber
• 13:23   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Bruce Momjian
• 13:33   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Ben Adida
• 13:35   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Bruce Momjian
• 13:35   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Marc G. Fournier
• 17:42   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Dominic J. Eidson
• 17:52   Re: RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) Bruce Momjian
• 17:52   Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 17:52   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Bruce Momjian
• 17:52   Re: Ready for RC1? Marc G. Fournier
• 17:52   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Marc G. Fournier
• 17:53   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Bruce Momjian
• 17:53   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Bruce Momjian
• 17:53   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Bruce Momjian
• 17:53   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Marc G. Fournier
• 17:54   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Bruce Momjian
• 17:54   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Bruce Momjian
• 18:03   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Keith G. Murphy
• 18:04   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Bruce Momjian
• 18:04   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Marc G. Fournier
• 18:12   Re: adding regression tests for PLs Peter Eisentraut
• 18:12   Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Tom Lane
• 18:12   Re: Ready for RC1? Tom Lane
• 18:12   Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 18:12   Re: Ready for RC1? Peter Eisentraut
• 18:12   Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 18:12   Re: RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) Patrick Welche
• 18:13   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Tom Lane
• 18:13   Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Tom Lane
• 18:15   Re: RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) Tom Lane
• 18:15   Re: RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu Peter Eisentraut
• 18:15   Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 18:15   Re: Ready for RC1? Tom Lane
• 18:17   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Bruce Momjian
• 18:17   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Jason Earl
• 18:18   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Jason Earl
• 18:18   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Peter Eisentraut
• 18:19   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Bruce Momjian
• 18:19   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Tom Lane
• 18:32   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Jan Wieck
• 18:42   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Jan Wieck
• 18:44   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL mlw
• 18:44   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Ned Wolpert
• 18:44   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL mlw
• 18:44   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL mlw
• 18:45   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL mlw
• 18:52   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Ned Wolpert
• 18:52   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Mitch Vincent
• 18:52   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Ned Wolpert
• 19:02   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Vince Vielhaber
• 19:03   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Vince Vielhaber
• 19:03   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Bruce Momjian
• 19:12   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Vince Vielhaber
• 19:12   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Mitch Vincent
• 19:12   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Peter Eisentraut
• 19:42   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Vince Vielhaber
• 19:42   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Vince Vielhaber
• 19:42   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Vince Vielhaber
• 19:42   Re: adding regression tests for PLs Tom Lane
• 19:42   RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Tom Lane
• 19:43   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Bruce Momjian
• 19:52   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Vince Vielhaber
• 19:52   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Vince Vielhaber
• 20:24   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Haroldo Stenger
• 21:22   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Ross J. Reedstrom
• 21:42   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Don Baccus
• 22:12   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Doug Royer
• 22:12   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Mike Mascari
• 22:12   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Peter Eisentraut
• 22:12   PostgreSQL License reina@nsi.edu (Tony Reina)
• 22:22   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Ned Wolpert
• 23:13   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Tom Lane
• 23:42   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Peter Harvey
• 23:52   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Thomas Lockhart

22 January 2002

• 00:12   Cross posting Greg Sabino Mullane
• 00:12   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Vince Vielhaber
• 00:32   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Don Baccus
• 00:42   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Don Baccus
• 00:42   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Don Baccus
• 01:02   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Thomas Lockhart
• 01:22   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Lamar Owen
• 02:42   TOra has postgres support Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:42   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Gavin Sherry
• 02:52   Re: Cross posting Tom Lane
• 03:02   Re: TOra has postgres support Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 03:02   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Don Baccus
• 04:12   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Bruce Momjian
• 04:42   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Thomas Lockhart
• 05:12   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Gavin Sherry
• 06:07   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Don Baccus
• 06:32   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Tom Lane
• 06:52   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Tom Lane
• 08:12   Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Lincoln Yeoh
• 08:43   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Vince Vielhaber
• 09:02   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Vince Vielhaber
• 10:33   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL (Can't take anymore! Make it mlw
• 11:42   Messages appending darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 12:12   Re: Messages appending Holger Krug
• 12:43   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Vince Vielhaber
• 12:43   Read-only access Michael Meskes
• 12:43   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Thomas Lockhart
• 13:02   Re: Messages appending Tom Lane
• 13:12   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Vince Vielhaber
• 13:12   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Thomas Lockhart
• 13:12   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL (Can't take anymore! Make it Tom Lane
• 13:43   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL (Can't take anymore! Hannu Krosing
• 13:43   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Tom Lane
• 13:43   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Bruce Momjian
• 13:52   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Fernando Nasser
• 14:03   How to avoid redundant Sort operations? (pgsql 7.1.2) Aris Tsois
• 14:03   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Ned Wolpert
• 14:03   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Don Baccus
• 14:12   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Justin Clift
• 14:12   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 14:13   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Ned Wolpert
• 14:14   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Thomas Lockhart
• 14:25   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Vince Vielhaber
• 14:25   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Tom Lane
• 14:33   Re: How to avoid redundant Sort operations? (pgsql 7.1.2) Tom Lane
• 14:43   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Thomas Lockhart
• 15:03   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Tom Lane
• 15:03   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Fernando Nasser
• 15:32   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Keith G. Murphy
• 16:42   RC1 finally wrapped ... Marc G. Fournier
• 18:02   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL mlw
• 18:32   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Fernando Nasser
• 18:32   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Bruce Momjian
• 18:43   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Tom Lane
• 18:43   Re: Spinning verses sleeping in s_lock Bruce Momjian
• 19:02   TODO question and claim Chris Humphries
• 19:13   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Fernando Nasser
• 19:23   Re: TODO question and claim Tom Lane
• 19:23   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Tom Lane
• 19:42   TODO item question Chris Humphries
• 19:42   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Tom Lane
• 19:42   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Fernando Nasser
• 20:02   Re: TODO item question Bruce Momjian
• 20:02   Re: TODO question and claim Chris Humphries
• 20:12   Re: Cross posting Greg Sabino Mullane
• 20:12   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Fernando Nasser
• 21:33   Re: Cross posting Tom Lane
• 21:33   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Peter Eisentraut
• 21:42   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Peter Eisentraut
• 21:42   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Tom Lane
• 21:42   Re: Cross posting Greg Sabino Mullane
• 22:12   Re: Cross posting Tom Lane
• 22:12   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Tom Lane
• 22:32   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Ross J. Reedstrom
• 22:43   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL Justin Clift
• 23:02   Re: Cross posting Ross J. Reedstrom
• 23:22   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Mike Mascari
• 23:32   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Bill Studenmund
• 23:52   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Peter Eisentraut

23 January 2002

• 00:42   Re: TODO item question Bruce Momjian
• 02:02   Re: TODO item question Peter Eisentraut
• 03:12   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Tom Lane
• 04:12   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Peter Eisentraut
• 07:12   pltcl build problem on FreeBSD (was: Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) Vsevolod Lobko
• 07:12   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 07:33   Re: Schemas vs. PostQUEL: resolving qualified identifiers Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 08:02   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 08:22   Auditing and Postgres 7.3 Gavin Sherry
• 09:12   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Henshall, Stuart - WCP
• 09:12   Re: Auditing and Postgres 7.3 Justin Clift
• 10:52   Red Hat 7.2 Regression failures (Re: pltcl build problem on FreeBSD (was: Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems)) Lamar Owen
• 10:52   Re: Auditing and Postgres 7.3 Gavin Sherry
• 11:02   Re: Auditing and Postgres 7.3 Murray Prior Hobbs
• 11:12   Re: Auditing and Postgres 7.3 Gavin Sherry
• 11:12   Re: Auditing and Postgres 7.3 Dave Page
• 11:12   Re: Auditing and Postgres 7.3 Lamar Owen
• 12:05   Add OR REPLACE clauses to non-FUNCTION object creation in PostgreSQL 7.3 Jean-Michel POURE
• 12:15   Re: Add OR REPLACE clauses to non-FUNCTION object creation in PostgreSQL 7.3 Kaare Rasmussen
• 12:23   Re: Add OR REPLACE clauses to non-FUNCTION object creation Gavin Sherry
• 12:24   Re: Add OR REPLACE clauses to non-FUNCTION object creation Gavin Sherry
• 12:24   Re: Add OR REPLACE clauses to non-FUNCTION object creat Dave Page
• 13:03   Re: pltcl build problem on FreeBSD (was: Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) Tom Lane
• 13:03   Re: Add OR REPLACE clauses to non-FUNCTION object creation in PostgreSQL 7.3 Holger Krug
• 13:13   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Tom Lane
• 13:13   Re: Schemas vs. PostQUEL: resolving qualified identifiers Tom Lane
• 13:33   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Tom Lane
• 13:43   Re: Auditing and Postgres 7.3 Ned Wolpert
• 14:10   Re: Auditing and Postgres 7.3 Matthew T. O'Connor
• 14:14   Re: Add OR REPLACE clauses to non-FUNCTION object creation in PostgreSQL 7.3 Tom Lane
• 14:14   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Tom Lane
• 14:23   Re: pltcl build problem on FreeBSD (was: Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) Tom Lane
• 14:26   postgresql.conf WAL options Bruce Momjian
• 14:44   TODO items and their related files? Chris Humphries
• 14:45   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Stephan Szabo
• 14:55   Re: pltcl build problem on FreeBSD (was: Re: pltlc and Peter Eisentraut
• 14:57   C++ problems with RC1 teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 15:03   Re: TODO items and their related files? Bruce Momjian
• 15:12   Re: pltcl build problem on FreeBSD (was: Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) Brent Verner
• 15:12   Re: pltcl build problem on FreeBSD (was: Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) Tom Lane
• 15:13   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Joe Conway (wwc)
• 15:13   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Tom Lane
• 15:13   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Tom Lane
• 15:13   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Stephan Szabo
• 15:13   Re: pltcl build problem on FreeBSD (was: Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) Tom Lane
• 15:42   Re: pltcl build problem on FreeBSD (was: Re: pltlc and pltlcu Bruce Momjian
• 15:44   Re: pltcl build problem on FreeBSD (was: Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) Brent Verner
• 16:05   Re: pltcl build problem on FreeBSD (was: Re: pltlc and Peter Eisentraut
• 16:05   Re: pltcl build problem on FreeBSD (was: Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) Bernhard Herzog
• 16:17   Re: pltcl build problem on FreeBSD (was: Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) Tom Lane
• 16:17   Re: pltcl build problem on FreeBSD (was: Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) Tom Lane
• 16:17   autoconf + newer gcc barfs teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 16:18   Re: pltcl build problem on FreeBSD (was: Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) Brent Verner
• 16:35   Re: Schemas vs. PostQUEL: resolving qualified identifiers Fernando Nasser
• 16:38   Savepoints Bruce Momjian
• 17:13   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Bruce Momjian
• 17:13   Re: Schemas vs. PostQUEL: resolving qualified identifiers Tom Lane
• 17:24   Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem Tom Lane
• 17:42   Re: pltcl build problem on FreeBSD (was: Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) Vsevolod Lobko
• 17:42   Re: Savepoints Haroldo Stenger
• 17:43   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Bill Studenmund
• 18:13   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Tom Lane
• 18:42   Re: Add OR REPLACE clauses to non-FUNCTION object creation in PostgreSQL 7.3 Jean-Michel POURE
• 19:03   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Bill Studenmund
• 19:03   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Tom Lane
• 19:13   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Bill Studenmund
• 19:13   Re: Add OR REPLACE clauses to non-FUNCTION object creation Jan Wieck
• 19:23   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Thomas Swan
• 19:33   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Bill Studenmund
• 19:43   perl problems in RC1 teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 19:43   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Tom Lane
• 20:04   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Tom Lane
• 20:12   Re: perl problems in RC1 Tom Lane
• 20:13   Re: Schemas vs. PostQUEL: resolving qualified identifiers Fernando Nasser
• 20:42   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Bill Studenmund
• 21:12   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Bill Studenmund
• 21:12   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Bill Studenmund
• 21:12   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Bill Studenmund
• 21:22   Checking for undefined in Perl interface code? Tom Lane
• 21:32   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Stephan Szabo
• 21:42   Re: Theory about XLogFlush startup failures Mikheev, Vadim
• 21:42   Re: Savepoints Mikheev, Vadim
• 22:03   PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Justin Clift
• 22:03   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Bill Studenmund
• 22:13   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Stephan Szabo
• 22:24   Re: Add OR REPLACE clauses to non-FUNCTION object creation Gavin Sherry
• 22:32   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Stephan Szabo
• 22:32   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Bill Studenmund
• 22:42   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Stephan Szabo
• 23:05   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Bill Studenmund
• 23:14   Re: Savepoints Bruce Momjian
• 23:25   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Stephan Szabo
• 23:25   Re: Savepoints Bruce Momjian
• 23:42   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Jan Wieck

24 January 2002

• 00:03   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Don Baccus
• 00:13   Re: Savepoints Mikheev, Vadim
• 00:13   Re: Savepoints Don Baccus
• 00:33   Bad Docs example Rod Taylor
• 01:12   Re: Red Hat 7.2 Regression failures (Re: pltcl build problem on FreeBSD (was: Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems)) Murray Prior Hobbs
• 01:12   Query taking a long time... Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 03:02   Re: Query taking a long time... Philip Warner
• 03:12   Re: Query taking a long time... Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 03:42   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Peter Eisentraut
• 07:43   Re: Checking for undefined in Perl interface code? Teodor Sigaev
• 08:13   7.1.4 Justin Clift
• 11:23   Re: 7.1.4 Marc G. Fournier
• 12:13   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Michael Devogelaere
• 12:33   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Michael Devogelaere
• 13:03   Re: 7.1.4 Justin Clift
• 13:03   Re: 7.1.4 Tom Lane
• 14:03   Re: 7.1.4 Justin Clift
• 14:03   Re: 7.1.4 Tom Lane
• 14:13   Re: Add OR REPLACE clauses to non-FUNCTION object creation in PostgreSQL 7.3 Jean-Michel POURE
• 14:23   Re: Add OR REPLACE clauses to non-FUNCTION object creat Dave Page
• 14:33   Re: Add OR REPLACE clauses to non-FUNCTION object creation in PostgreSQL 7.3 Jean-Michel POURE
• 14:42   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Don Baccus
• 14:42   Re: Savepoints Hiroshi Inoue
• 14:42   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Jan Wieck
• 14:53   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Justin Clift
• 15:03   Re: Checking for undefined in Perl interface code? Tom Lane
• 15:13   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Michael Devogelaere
• 15:13   Re: Add OR REPLACE clauses to non-FUNCTION object creation in PostgreSQL 7.3 Ross J. Reedstrom
• 15:33   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Mitch Vincent
• 16:13   Re: Add OR REPLACE clauses to non-FUNCTION object creation in PostgreSQL 7.3 Jean-Michel POURE
• 16:13   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Tom Lane
• 16:33   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Michael Devogelaere
• 16:43   Re: 7.1.4 Denis Perchine
• 16:53   Re: 7.1.4 Marc G. Fournier
• 17:03   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Tom Lane
• 17:13   Re: 7.1.4 Tom Lane
• 17:13   Re: Savepoints Mikheev, Vadim
• 17:23   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Jan Wieck
• 17:23   Re: Savepoints Bruce Momjian
• 17:43   Re: C++ problems with RC1 Tom Lane
• 17:53   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Bill Studenmund
• 18:03   Re: C++ problems with RC1 Trond Eivind Glomsrød
• 18:03   Re: C++ problems with RC1 Trond Eivind Glomsrød
• 18:03   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Bill Studenmund
• 18:03   Re: autoconf + newer gcc barfs Tom Lane
• 18:13   Re: C++ problems with RC1 Tom Lane
• 18:23   Ready for RC2 I guess... Tom Lane
• 19:03   Re: Ready for RC2 I guess... teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 19:14   Re: Ready for RC2 I guess... Tom Lane
• 19:43   Re: [Chip Turner ] Re: perl problems in RC1 Tom Lane
• 20:33   Re: Ready for RC2 I guess... Tom Lane
• 20:43   Re: Ready for RC2 I guess... Peter Eisentraut
• 21:03   Re: Ready for RC2 I guess... Peter Eisentraut
• 21:13   Re: Ready for RC2 I guess... Tom Lane
• 21:13   Re: postgresql-7.2b3-betterquote.patch Bruce Momjian
• 21:43   Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L Bruce Momjian
• 22:43   Re: Savepoints Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:43   Re: Ready for RC2 I guess... Marc G. Fournier
• 22:43   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Justin Clift
• 23:03   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Tom Lane
• 23:13   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Tom Lane
• 23:13   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Bruce Momjian
• 23:33   Re: Problem reloading regression database Bruce Momjian
• 23:33   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Tom Lane
• 23:43   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Bruce Momjian
• 23:43   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Peter Eisentraut
• 23:43   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Michael Devogelaere

25 January 2002

• 00:03   Re: problem with notify/listen Bruce Momjian
• 00:03   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Tom Lane
• 00:13   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Justin Clift
• 00:33   Re: contrib: int_array_aggregator() int_array_enum() Bruce Momjian
• 00:42   Re: Ready for RC2 I guess... Marc G. Fournier
• 00:43   Re: Bad Docs example Bruce Momjian
• 01:14   Re: Ready for RC2 I guess... Tom Lane
• 01:45   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Bruce Momjian
• 01:45   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Bruce Momjian
• 02:03   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Peter Eisentraut
• 02:33   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Gavin Sherry
• 02:42   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Tom Lane
• 02:43   Re: Backend shutdown time? Tom Lane
• 02:43   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Jan Wieck
• 02:43   Backend shutdown time? Tom Lane
• 02:43   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Bruce Momjian
• 03:33   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Peter Eisentraut
• 03:43   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Tom Lane
• 03:43   Database access right Lau NH
• 04:13   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Bruce Momjian
• 04:43   Re: problem with notify/listen Barry Lind
• 07:14   RTREE Index on primary key generated by a sequence Jean-Paul ARGUDO
• 07:15   Re: [ADMIN] Database access right Lau NH
• 07:26   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Michael Devogelaere
• 08:34   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Holger Krug
• 09:43   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 09:53   typo in contrib/oid2name Oleg Bartunov
• 10:45   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Lincoln Yeoh
• 12:03   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Holger Krug
• 12:13   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Jan Wieck
• 12:13   new module contrib/tree for 7.2 ? Oleg Bartunov
• 12:13   Re: RTREE Index on primary key generated by a sequence Bruno Wolff III
• 12:23   Re: Savepoints Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 13:33   Re: RTREE Index on primary key generated by a sequence Tom Lane
• 13:33   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Michael Devogelaere
• 13:33   New system OIDS inside include/catalog/pg_proc.h Greg Sabino Mullane
• 13:33   Re: new module contrib/tree for 7.2 ? Tom Lane
• 13:43   Re: typo in contrib/oid2name Tom Lane
• 14:13   Re: RTREE Index on primary key generated by a sequence Daniel Kalchev
• 14:13   Re: RTREE Index on primary key generated by a sequence Jean-Paul ARGUDO
• 14:13   Re: new module contrib/tree for 7.2 ? Hannu Krosing
• 14:13   Fwd: Re: RTREE Index on primary key generated by a sequence Jean-Paul ARGUDO
• 14:13   Re: New system OIDS inside include/catalog/pg_proc.h Peter Eisentraut
• 14:13   Re: New system OIDS inside include/catalog/pg_proc.h Tom Lane
• 14:43   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Jan Wieck
• 14:43   Re: RTREE Index on primary key generated by a sequence Tom Lane
• 14:53   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Stephan Szabo
• 15:03   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Tom Lane
• 15:13   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Tom Lane
• 15:13   Re: new module contrib/tree for 7.2 ? Bruce Momjian
• 15:13   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Bruce Momjian
• 15:13   Re: RTREE Index on primary key generated by a sequence Jean-Paul ARGUDO
• 15:13   Re: new module contrib/tree for 7.2 ? Don Baccus
• 15:43   Re: RTREE Index on primary key generated by a sequence Hannu Krosing
• 15:43   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Tom Lane
• 16:13   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Vince Vielhaber
• 17:03   Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL Bruno Wolff III
• 17:23   contrib/tree Oleg Bartunov
• 18:33   sequence indexes Vince Vielhaber
• 18:43   Re: sequence indexes Tom Lane
• 18:53   Re: sequence indexes Vince Vielhaber
• 19:03   Re: sequence indexes Vince Vielhaber
• 19:03   Re: sequence indexes Tom Lane
• 19:03   Re: sequence indexes Tom Lane
• 19:13   Re: sequence indexes Vince Vielhaber
• 19:13   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Bill Studenmund
• 19:13   Re: Savepoints Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 19:43   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 19:53   Re: Savepoints Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 20:13   Re: sequence indexes Tom Lane
• 20:13   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Bill Studenmund
• 20:13   Re: sequence indexes Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 20:43   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Tom Lane
• 21:53   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Bill Studenmund
• 22:13   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Tom Lane
• 22:13   Re: Savepoints Bruce Momjian
• 22:33   Re: contrib/tree Don Baccus
• 23:43   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Bill Studenmund

26 January 2002

• 01:13   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Thomas Lockhart
• 03:43   Re: bug in permission handling? Gavin Sherry
• 04:33   Re: bug in permission handling? Tom Lane
• 06:13   Re: bug in permission handling? Gavin Sherry
• 06:13   Re: sequence indexes Justin Clift
• 16:03   Re: Theory about XLogFlush startup failures Tom Lane
• 17:13   Re: contrib/tree Peter Eisentraut
• 17:43   Re: contrib/tree Don Baccus
• 23:13   Re: contrib/tree Don Baccus
• 23:33   Re: Theory about XLogFlush startup failures Thomas Lockhart

27 January 2002

• 02:04   Re: Theory about XLogFlush startup failures Tom Lane
• 03:53   PostgreSQL v7.2rc2 Released Marc G. Fournier
• 05:13   Re: PostgreSQL v7.2rc2 Released Don Baccus
• 05:33   Re: PostgreSQL v7.2rc2 Released Marc G. Fournier
• 13:43   Re: contrib/tree Don Baccus
• 14:13   Re: pltcl build problem on FreeBSD (was: Re: pltlc and Peter Eisentraut
• 23:43   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Hiroshi Inoue

28 January 2002

• 03:14   Re: PostgreSQL v7.2rc2 Released Lamar Owen
• 06:04   FAQ errata Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 08:45   Re: FAQ errata Vince Vielhaber
• 10:14   Re: FAQ errata Bruce Momjian
• 12:06   Locks, more complicated than I orginally thought Chris Humphries
• 15:04   Re: Locks, more complicated than I orginally thought Tom Lane
• 18:34   Improving backend launch time by preloading relcache Tom Lane
• 18:34   Re: sequence indexes mlw
• 19:44   Per-database and per-user GUC settings Peter Eisentraut
• 20:04   Rules for accessing tuple data in backend code Peter Eisentraut
• 21:05   Re: Rules for accessing tuple data in backend code John Gray
• 21:14   Re: PostgreSQL v7.2rc2 Released teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 22:34   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Bill Studenmund
• 23:14   Re: Per-database and per-user GUC settings Tom Lane
• 23:36   Re: Rules for accessing tuple data in backend code Tom Lane

29 January 2002

• 01:04   Backup database through web and php Lau NH
• 02:44   Re: Improving backend launch time by preloading relcache Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:14   Re: Improving backend launch time by preloading relcache Tom Lane
• 03:44   Re: Improving backend launch time by preloading relcache Hiroshi Inoue
• 04:04   Re: Improving backend launch time by preloading relcache Tom Lane
• 04:14   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Hiroshi Inoue
• 05:34   Re: Improving backend launch time by preloading relcache Hiroshi Inoue
• 05:44   Re: sequence indexes Hannu Krosing
• 05:44   timing queries Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 08:16   Re: timing queries Gavin Sherry
• 09:05   inline is not ANSI C Luis Amigo
• 09:05   Re: Improving backend launch time by preloading relcache Oleg Bartunov
• 10:44   Re: timing queries Hannu Krosing
• 11:05   Re: sequence indexes mlw
• 11:24   Re: sequence indexes Hannu Krosing
• 13:14   Re: Improving backend launch time by preloading relcache Tom Lane
• 13:45   Re: inline is not ANSI C Tom Lane
• 13:45   Re: inline is not ANSI C teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 14:50   Re: sequence indexes Ross J. Reedstrom
• 15:16   Re: PostgreSQL 7.1.3 on OpenServer 5 Larry Rosenman
• 15:54   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Bill Studenmund
• 22:04   Re: Improving backend launch time by preloading relcache Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:25   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:34   A simpler way to configure the source code? Peter Eisentraut
• 22:34   Syscaches should store negative entries, too Tom Lane
• 22:44   Re: Per-database and per-user GUC settings Peter Eisentraut
• 22:44   Re: A simpler way to configure the source code? Don Baccus
• 22:54   Re: A simpler way to configure the source code? Tom Lane
• 23:44   Re: A simpler way to configure the source code? Mitch Vincent

30 January 2002

• 00:44   Re: A simpler way to configure the source code? Haroldo Stenger
• 00:44   Re: Syscaches should store negative entries, too Thomas Lockhart
• 02:04   Re: Syscaches should store negative entries, too Peter Eisentraut
• 04:05   Re: Syscaches should store negative entries, too Tom Lane
• 04:44   Re: Improving backend launch time by preloading relcache Tom Lane
• 06:05   Re: Improving backend launch time by preloading relcache Hiroshi Inoue
• 06:44   Re: Per-database and per-user GUC settings Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 07:05   Re: inline is not ANSI C Luis Amigo
• 07:14   Re: inline is not ANSI C Luis Amigo
• 08:45   Re: Syscaches should store negative entries, too Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 08:46   Re: Improving backend launch time by preloading relcache Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
• 11:44   Re: inline is not ANSI C Trond Eivind Glomsrød
• 12:14   Re: inline is not ANSI C Thomas Lockhart
• 12:35   Re: A simpler way to configure the source code? Justin Clift
• 13:15   Re: A simpler way to configure the source code? Dave Page
• 13:44   Re: inline is not ANSI C Tom Lane
• 13:44   Re: Per-database and per-user GUC settings Tom Lane
• 14:06   Re: Syscaches should store negative entries, too Tom Lane
• 14:06   Re: A simpler way to configure the source code? teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 15:53   postgresql under Windows is slow Oleg Bartunov
• 16:05   Re: [ADMIN] postgresql under Windows is slow Tom Lane
• 16:45   Re: [ADMIN] postgresql under Windows is slow Matthew T. O'Connor
• 17:14   Re: Syscaches should store negative entries, too Tom Lane
• 17:48   PostgreSQL Final Release ... Monday? Marc G. Fournier
• 17:55   Re: PostgreSQL Final Release ... Monday? Vince Vielhaber
• 17:55   Re: A simpler way to configure the source code? Kaare Rasmussen
• 18:05   Re: PostgreSQL Final Release ... Monday? Vince Vielhaber
• 18:14   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Bill Studenmund
• 18:14   Re: PostgreSQL Final Release ... Monday? Marc G. Fournier
• 18:14   Re: A simpler way to configure the source code? Don Baccus
• 18:15   Re: [ADMIN] postgresql under Windows is slow Dave Page
• 19:14   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Tom Lane
• 19:25   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Bill Studenmund
• 19:44   Re: PostgreSQL Final Release ... Monday? mlw
• 20:06   Re: PostgreSQL Final Release ... Monday? Bruce Momjian
• 21:15   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Tom Lane
• 21:55   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Bill Studenmund
• 22:05   Re: Array aggregation. Was: PostgreSQL Final Release ... Monday? mlw
• 22:14   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:55   Re: PostgreSQL Final Release ... Monday? Peter Eisentraut
• 23:35   Re: A simpler way to configure the source code? Christopher Kings-Lynne

31 January 2002

• 00:14   Re: Improving backend launch time by preloading relcache Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:14   Re: Per-database and per-user GUC settings Peter Eisentraut
• 00:14   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:35   Re: A simpler way to configure the source code? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 00:35   Re: A simpler way to configure the source code? Justin Clift
• 00:45   Re: Improving backend launch time by preloading relcache Tom Lane
• 00:45   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Tom Lane
• 00:55   Re: Improving backend launch time by preloading relcache Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:15   Re: Improving backend launch time by preloading relcache Tom Lane
• 01:44   freebsd postgres port Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:44   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:55   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Tom Lane
• 01:55   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Tom Lane
• 02:14   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:35   more info in permission errors Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:44   Kerberos and fe-auth... Sean Chittenden
• 03:14   Re: Kerberos and fe-auth... Peter Eisentraut
• 03:14   Re: proper ordering of a UNICODE / Hebrew postgres database cluster Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:35   Re: Kerberos and fe-auth... Sean Chittenden
• 06:35   Re: A simpler way to configure the source code? Dave Page
• 07:47   Re: inline is not ANSI C Luis Amigo
• 08:45   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Hiroshi Inoue
• 09:15   Re: [ADMIN] postgresql under Windows is slow Oleg Bartunov
• 09:45   Re: [ADMIN] postgresql under Windows is slow Dave Page
• 10:16   Re: [ADMIN] postgresql under Windows is slow Oleg Bartunov
• 13:26   Re: [ADMIN] postgresql under Windows is slow Tom Lane
• 14:09   Re: Per-database and per-user GUC settings Tom Lane
• 14:52   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Bill Studenmund
• 14:53   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Bill Studenmund
• 14:53   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Bill Studenmund
• 14:53   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Bill Studenmund
• 15:45   Re: [ADMIN] postgresql under Windows is slow Oleg Bartunov
• 17:35   Re: [ADMIN] postgresql under Windows is slow Adrian Phillips
• 23:05   Re: Per-database and per-user GUC settings Peter Eisentraut
• 23:14   Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects Hiroshi Inoue