Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Could we remove lines 552-560 of pgbench.c? The behavior that guarded
> >> against is long gone, and forcing a checkpoint every few thousand tuples
> >> seems to be putting a huge crimp in the speed of pgbench -i ...
>
> > I don't see any need for it.
>
> Au contraire. I'm nearly done with pgbench -i -s 500 after about an
> hour. The unmodified code ran for several hours and was less than
> half done.
I meant I don't see any need for that checkpoint code.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
