Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem
Date
Msg-id 288.1010370759@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hannu Krosing <hannu@krosing.net> writes:
> I misinterpreted the fact that new VACUUM will skip locked pages

Huh?  There is no such "fact".
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Sean Chittenden
Date:
Subject: Re: pgcryto strangeness...
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Spinning verses sleeping in s_lock