Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Hannu Krosing <hannu@krosing.net> writes:
> > I misinterpreted the fact that new VACUUM will skip locked pages
>
> Huh? There is no such "fact".
>
> regards, tom lane
Was it not the case that instead of locking whole tables the new
vacuum locks only one page at a time. If it can't lock that page it
just moves to next one instead of waiting for other backend to release
its lock. At least I remember that this was the (proposed?) behaviour
once.
---------------
Hannu
