Re: RC1 time? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: RC1 time?
Date
Msg-id 20020109161953.H15832-100000@earth.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RC1 time?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: RC1 time?  (Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>)
List pgsql-hackers
We're going from 512Meg -> 4GB ... most of the issues right now are swap
related ... that machine is just swapping like crazy ...

On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

> As long as we're talking about overloaded resources ...
>
> The mailing list servers seem to have been horribly overloaded for a
> long time.  In the past couple days it's been particularly bad (three-
> to four-hour turnaround for postings).  Will these planned upgrades
> help that situation at all?
>
>             regards, tom lane
>



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Doug Royer
Date:
Subject: Re: Does getopt() return "-1", or "EOF", at end?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump bug ... or not?